The 'Good Nazi' who was, in fact, a calculating and unscrupulous man, fully aware and responsible for the Nazi regime's crimes
A cheerful man in Nazi uniform walks with a group of women. One of the women pushes a stroller, from which a child looks at the man admiringly. This is a photo of Albert Speer, the Nazi architect and later Minister of Armaments, responsible for the "armament miracle" that enabled Germany to achieve impressive armaments figures in the last years of World War II.
Albert Speer was tried at the Nuremberg trials, where he expressed regret as one of the few Nazi leaders. This earned him his reputation as a "good Nazi", which he carefully cultivated after his release. For example, he would have personally ensured that Hitler's "Nero decree", with which Hitler wanted to destroy Germany's economic capacity forever, was not carried out. He knew nothing of the horrors of the Holocaust and the working conditions of the slave laborers in the arms factories for which he was responsible. As a simple architect, he was more interested in technology than politics.
Magnus Brechtken leaves no stone unturned in exposing the so-called "good Nazi" reputation of Albert Speer as a liar and fantasist. He was an ambitious and unscrupulous figure who had already discovered in the early 1930s how he could use his "Führernähe" (friendship with Hitler) to achieve his ambitions. His so-called armament miracle was not due to him, but the groundwork had been laid by his predecessors.
Brechtken is also not kind to the Allies, such as the lawyers of the Nuremberg trials and the Western media after the war, who gladly gave Speer all (uncritical) space. The interrogators were taken in by Speer during the Nuremberg tribunal hearings. Perhaps it was the morbid interest in Hitler that made them listen to Speer so eagerly. After all, he was one of the few who had remained in Hitler's favor throughout the war. In addition, they could give Speer all the space without ideological objections, because he had not been one of the "good Nazis". The Germans themselves also liked his carefully cultivated image as a "good Nazi". After all, Speer's willingness to serve as a penitent also absolved the "ordinary" Germans of the horrors of war. This myth was therefore not often subjected to critical scrutiny, let alone supported by documents from that time.
Brechtken convincingly shows, supported by documents and eyewitness accounts, that Speer was a calculating, unscrupulous man who worked diligently and creatively on his own career, power, and well-being with the sole goal of fame for himself. His so-called atonement was nothing more than an attempt to disguise the fact that he had built up, consolidated, and maintained the Nazi system as a co-organizer of it for years.
I recommend that anyone who has read Speer's memoirs and has gotten the impression that Speer was a "good Nazi" also read this book.
Read in Dutch