Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Proportion and Style in Ancient Egyptian Art

Rate this book
The painted and relief-cut walls of ancient Egyptian tombs and temples record an amazing continuity of customs and beliefs over nearly 3,000 years. Even the artistic style of the scenes seems unchanging, but this appearance is deceptive. In this work, Gay Robins offers convincing evidence, based on a study of Egyptian usage of grid systems and proportions, that innovation and stylistic variation played a significant role in ancient Egyptian art. Robins thoroughly explores the squared grid systems used by the ancient artists to proportion standing, sitting, and kneeling human figures. This investigation yields the first chronological account of proportional variations in male and female figures from the Early Dynastic to the Ptolemaic periods. Robins discusses in detail the proportional changes underlying the revolutionary style instituted during the Amarna Period. She also considers how the grid system influenced the composition of scenes as a whole. Numerous line drawings with superimposed grids illustrate the text.

283 pages, Hardcover

First published November 30, 1993

6 people are currently reading
43 people want to read

About the author

Gay Robins

15 books10 followers
An art historian, her work focuses on ancient Egyptian art, composition, gender and sexuality.

Professor Gay Robins studied Egyptology as an undergraduate at the University of Durham, and then obtained a D.Phil. from Oxford University in 1981 under the supervision of Professor John Baines. In 1988 obtained her promotion to Professor. She retired in 2018 as Professor Emerita of Art History.
Over the course of her career, she has published numerous articles and books on the topics of Ancient Egyptian art, the decoration of eighteenth dynasty non-royal Theban tombs, and women and gender issues in Ancient Egypt.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (37%)
4 stars
3 (37%)
3 stars
2 (25%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Ed Smiley.
243 reviews43 followers
January 28, 2011
This book will have different appeal depending.

I think this is of a lot of interest to anybody, who is

* interested in alternate artistic canons of the human body
* an Egyptologist
* Egyptian art

Dry, scholarly, be warned, but fascinating. I am not a researcher in the field so I tended to skim the book.

If anything, this increased my respect for ancient Egyptian art.

They had a complete system for encoding three dimensional objects in two dimensions without perspective in order to enhance the two dimensional decorative patterns. They portrayed the most typical view of each part, combining them in a seamless way, which reminds one of Cubism.

If a god (or king etc.) normally held a scepter in the right hand, they would portray the god that way if the god was facing right. They identified right with forward.

Sometimes, they would put a figure facing "backwards", to the left, to add rhythm.

If the same god were facing left, the god would be effectively mirror imaged, yet the scepter would still be in the right hand but it would be attached to the left arm.

So the spatial logic of the scene, and the way that right/forward left/back was encoded in Egyptian art would trump the side of the hand that had the thumb in real life. And I am sure that most artists were aware of this, and it bothered them no more than blueprint of a building bothers us.

In temples the work was usually completed. But in tombs the heirs usually stopped work when uncle Anentahiptohop dropped dead, since they needed to use the tomb, and they wanted to have something left of the estate.

Anyway, because the work is incomplete, they can see the way that the work is laid out in tombs.

There is a grid system for organizing and relating the major figures. It's sort of like the heads system in western life drawing--they just don't try to cover every possible situation at any possible angle like we do, anyway that would defeat the purpose of harmonizing everything in the plane.

This mostly applies to the major figures. Minor figures were almost invariably drawn freehand. Also, they relaxed almost all of the canon in depicting battles, since these were supposed to portray conflict.

Profile Image for David Waldron.
58 reviews33 followers
April 26, 2020
In the initial stage of scene composition, ancient Egyptian draftsmen often applied vertical and horizontal lines forming a grid on the surface to be decorated. The grid was used to ensure that the scene’s major figures were proportioned correctly. This books explores this technique and the way in which it evolved over pharaonic history. The author's prose is clear and concise and she writes authoritatively. The topic is quite specialized and may not be of interest to the general reader. However, the author provides an introduction to the principles and conventions of Egyptian art that I found extraordinarily lucid and useful.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.