Context: I am an avid backpacker with experience in Northern Minnesota winters and Southern Arizona summers including the Grand Canyon. I’ve studied a similar book “Death in Grand Canyon”, and have spent a week hiking in Glacier.
“Death and Survival in Glacier National Park” is encyclopedic in it’s scope. It covers all types of mishaps in the park, each chapter on a different hazard category. At the end, it includes a complete list of all deaths and their causes since the inception of the park.
One of the best parts about this book is that everything is told through stories - it’s not a dry compendium of facts and figures, but tries to get us to empathize with the victims by giving us their background history, how they got into trouble, and what is known about their struggle to survive. In addition the book is filled with photos (black & white) of the people and places in the stories.
I have mixed feelings about the book’s Introduction story about a Grizzly attack, when only 10 of the 246 deaths in the park are from bears. Yes, people should be concerned about them, and they make for a great story, but OTOH it deflects attention from falls and drowning which account for 110 deaths. The story engaged me emotionally, I get why it is the lead story, but I just wonder whether it is best to frighten people with bear stories. But maybe that’s why some people read this book, to be frightened a bit, and they won’t be disappointed! In fact, some of the bear attack stories later in the book are incredibly graphic - they scared the heck out of me!
I would have liked to see more analysis of what people did wrong in the chapters on falls and drowning and weather-caused deaths. Obviously, people who get too close to a river bank should not have done so, but I kept waiting for a bit more analysis as to the mistakes the people made, and what they should have done differently. The Exposure chapter has a good example at the end of a pair of hikers who survived. Their tale has some good lessons for everyone, but I would have liked more info about the equipment that they had (it mentioned in the story that the gear was a factor in their survival - what was it?)
The book is succinct and readable in a reasonable amount of time, but some of the stories lacked enough context to draw out my interest. The Grand Canyon book went into a lot more depth, but told fewer stories, for good or ill. Chapter 6 on homicides and suicides goes into quite a bit of depth, but ends with a one-paragraph suicide story. The latter omits details easily available on the web, such as the victim’s 20 years of service in the Navy.
A nice touch: the Lovely Last Walk was a brief but sweet description of the death of a 92 year-old woman of natural causes. I would have liked to know more about her!
Overall, I can highly recommend this book to people who are interested in the risks of going into wild and dangerous places, and those that are specifically getting ready for a trip to Glacier. When you get done reading this book you will know more about the things to worry about (and not worry about!) than the vast majority of the folks who visit the park. I am very glad I had the opportunity to read the book (it was supplied by the publisher), and I look forward to my next trip to Glacier National Park!