This was my second time to read the book. I first read it maybe 25 years ago and hardly remembered it at all. Though Basil's commentary on the 6 Days of Creation was widely praised in the Patristic era, it is probably more important now as a historical example of Cappadocian exegesis. Basil knows the science/philosophy of his day - he engages it both critically and also accepting its truths. We can speculate how he might have related to modern science, but he does not raise modern scientific questions in approaching the Genesis text. Half the book is sermons on the Psalms and again are mostly of interest in that they show how he read the text. He uses methods of exegesis common to others of his day and as found in Jewish tradition. He often treats each line of the Psalms as almost a proverb which can be interpreted isolated from the context of the Psalm. He often uses a "word list" to interpret a text - he takes one word from a Psalm verse, finds another biblical text which has that same word and then uses that text to interpret the text at hand. Thus texts we would consider completely and logically unrelated, he brings together and then finds surprising meaning in the text. One downside is any verse and any word can be taken out of context and then used to uphold some doctrine. He shows an amazing familiarity with the texts and finds meaning in texts that otherwise seem obscure or unimportant. For him it is all the Word of God, so every word is important whether in context or not.