I read this for a very specific reason due to curiosity about the people who lived in my host family's houses that had social roles with no analogue to anything I’ve experienced in the states. I never could figure out what/who exactly they were and tbh after finishing this I’m still not clear on some things.
This book focuses mostly on Delhi, and many of the interviewees seem to be part of Lahiri’s extended social network. The book is extremely anecdotal. It’s not that she didn’t do any research, obviously she did, but it’s very much about a super specific milieu. Many wealthy families in Delhi get girls from Jharkhand or Orissa to come work for them. There are a ton of issues with labor trafficking, underaged workers, workers not being paid, inability to return home, and physical/emotional/sexual abuse of maids.
The situations are never so simple. Lahiri tags along on several rescue missions done by nonprofits. Sometimes the maids do not want to return home, even if they aren’t getting paid and are essentially enslaved, because life in rural villages has its own challenges. Sometimes an employer may not give their help wages or a day off, but will pay for their children’s schooling and weddings. That arrangement seems ripe for abuse but is difficult to regulate. Sometimes nonprofits are actually labor trafficking outfits in disguise. Sometimes legit rescue operations get accused of being the traffickers. Of course, slow moving bureaucracy typically proves inadequate for solving these situations. It’s even more difficult when you live in an extremely remote village, do not speak Hindi or English, and have no money to find your child who went to the city to work 6 years ago and hasn’t called since.
Many of the employers had a sense of victimization due to the increasing demands and perceived laziness of maids who want pesky things such as “a day off” “not get beaten” “a tea break” “to get paid at all”. “We [the employers] should unite & fight against them [the maids]” (79). Typical “no one wants to work anymore!” style of complaining just because people don’t want to work for FREE. No one has LOYALTY because they’ll just go to someone who pays more! This seemed laughable to me, and totally insane, but I had to remind myself that every other week we have people on twitter making complaints that their instacart servants aren’t good at their jobs.
There was one anecdote about a “minimalist” couple who had a total of 10 servants. In theory they had so much free time because they never had to cook, clean, care for children, drive, or whatever else it was that the servants did. But the husband said he was so stressed out because he spent all his time managing the 10 servants! What is the point!!
I’m not the audience for this book. Maids are definitely not the audience for this book. The book is aimed at other members of Lahiri’s cohort, namely wealthy Indians who have servants but are also left leaning and consider themselves progressive. Lahiri interviews a woman who states that “class warfare needs to take place between members of the same class. People like us won’t change their behaviour unless they’re likely to lose face in front of another member of their own social class”. I get where she’s coming from, but the problem with a shame based model is that by nature the sites of these abuses take place in private, in the home. This atomisation within homes and lack of regulation/oversight also means it would be difficult for maids to form some kind of trade union to advocate for their rights. Lahiri isn’t really offering solutions here beyond trying to get her fellow elites to feel guilty enough to treat their servants better. She isn’t asking them to stop employing them, because that’s one of few viable paths for an impoverished rural family to get a foothold into the middle class. At one point Lahiri tries to give her maid a raise, and the maid rejects it because she’s afraid people back home will be suspicious that she’s doing sex work.
I’ve never been to Delhi aside from the airport. I lived in Jharkhand, and the majority of places I’ve been to in India are the “supply” states in the northeast like West Bengal, Orissa, Bihar etc. I would have liked to know more about places other than Delhi, because the stories here generally fit a standard rural→ big city supply chain of labor trafficking. Of course one book can’t address the entire history of domestic labor in all of India. And many of the anecdotes provided did provide insight into hierarchy, intricate unspoken rules such as spatial politics of seating arrangements, and of course all the glaring problems with the domestic labor situation in India. I did learn some things that I was not able to make sense of as a 16 year old coming from a country where this is not the norm. The book itself is structured somewhat randomly, and it was difficult to remember who was who. I wish it had had a stronger thru-line, maybe focusing on only one or two narratives instead of so many stories about both employers, maids, people she knows, her own life, and crime stories from the news. I read Maid by Stephanie Land earlier this year, but the circumstances of a maid in India and a maid in the US are so vastly different that it’s barely even worth comparing.