How does one review a sports autobiography?
By the quality of the great life anecdotes that only a famous person could have experienced?
As a literary work: the way in which the prose flows, and the quality of the writing?
By reference (in McEnroe's case) to the very visible, and audible, public figure on our screens and radios almost every day?
But Seriously is billed as An Autobiography by John McEnroe. No mention is made of any 'collaboration with..'; and I can believe that much of this is McEnroe's own work. The book jumps all over the place. It's very disjointed. McEnroe's own playing career is spliced with talk about today's great players; his tennis commentating merges into other broadcasting interests; this happens mid paragraph, even mid sentence.
Few readers, though, buy this sort of book for literary merit.
I bought his latest book (in a ridiculously over populated field of sports biographies), so despite my big reservations about so many aspects on the book, I'm conscious that I'm the mug for bringing on what turns out to be so predictable.
I do admire McEnroe for expanding his career after his halcyon playing days, and achieving fame outside of, and beyond, his own considerable tennis playing accomplishments. He has undeniably established a bona fide second career based around verbal communication. In matters of tennis, his opinion is well informed, and worth listening to.
However, But Seriously is little more than an opportunity for McEnroe to drop names (Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney among others are thanked by McEnroe in his end of book acknowledgements!!), luxuriate in his enduring fame, and generally boast about his life achievements. So much of what he says is so hypocritical as to be embarrassing.
Few people born before 1990 will forget McEnroe's consistently appalling on court behaviour, the intent of which was to gain advantage by disrupting his opponents. Pretty well cheating. Yet McEnroe can blandly criticise todays gamesmanship, and then pseudo laugh about his own behaviour.
McEnroe: "The question of gamesmanship arises; the whole thing has become a total joke; people calling trainers, taking medical timeouts, taking bathroom breaks, faking injuries, all the usual stuff. Any loophole in the rules is fully taken advantage of. I should know- I made an art of bending the rules I my day"
Either you are poacher turned gamekeeper, and remorseful, or you continue to advocate winning by any means. You can't have it both ways.
One of the great joys of actually being present at a tennis match, at Wimbledon, anywhere, is that you don't have to endure the accompanying TV commentary. You still have the sound of the crowd, and the ball on racquet.
It would appear that such a view is a dissenting one, and John McEnroe more than any other commentator is the voice that viewers tune in to hear, to listen to his particular take on the contest.
When John McEnroe occupies the commentary booth there are two events taking place. There's the match of the day, and then there's the verbose McEnroe and his personal performance. If a match goes the distance it's not only the players showing fatigue. At the end of a McEnroe commentated match I'm also exhausted after the continuous verbal outpouring.
He never shuts up.
This is the one time I yearn for commercial breaks to afford some small respite.
It's not helped by the slavish sycophancy of whoever is sharing his commentary booth. The support act is there to set up the great man.
How would you have fared against today's players, Mac?
What would you do to shake up British tennis/ American tennis/Australian tennis, Mac (select according to the hosting country)?
How would you have handled today's Hawkeye technology, Mac?
And so on.
Those days of (radio) commentary, of Richie Benaud and John Arlott, painting their subtle and carefully considered pictures, are a million miles away from Mr. McEnroe.
Yet McEnroe describes Brad Gilbert, a contemporary, with whom he has had well-documented disagreements, thus:
: " he's (Gilbert) known as a world class talker. And coming from me, that's saying something. If there's a silence he'll fill in and then never stop. : "
(The only tennis player of similar vintage who really seems to get under McEnroe's skin is Ivan Lendl. I look forward to his biography, one day)!
McEnroe has already written one autobiography, when he finished playing the main events. You would think that he didn’t need to tell us again what a great player he is/was.
It's no coincidence that he's manufactured some media interest in this newly launched (during Wimbledon) book, by talking up the disparity in playing standards between men and women. McEnroe is always talking about him vs Serena Williams as a match up. Donald Trump, no less, likes this sort of confrontational hypothesis. So McEnroe puts it out there again, to sell some books? Or to reinforce how amazing he is, at fifty eight, to be talked about by reference to Serena?
Self-selected examples of McEnroe's greatness dominate the book, but a particularly odious one is on Page 205:
McEnroe on Andy Murray and GB Davis Cup success in 2015 " which he(Murray) won virtually single- handed, taking eleven matches out of twelve, just one less than my (McEnroe) clean sweep in 1982- one record that can only ever be equalled, not broken"
John McEnroe is one of the most famous people to have emerged, in any field, over the last fifty years. He gives a lot of joy, and he does great charitable work through tennis.
The doyenne of British sports anchoring, Sue Barker, has been a constant and familiar presence at multiple sports events and BBC TV shows over thirty years. She was an exceptional professional tennis player herself.
But despite the wide range of her sporting and broadcasting experience, the one question she is always asked is "What is it like to work with John McEnroe"??!!
Look hard enough, though, and there's another untold story concerning John McEnroe.
"I must admit that as the years have gone, I and my sons in particular, have struggled to settle in a direction in life" (101)
I imagine that I will read any third part of JP McEnroe's life story, and just maybe a greater degree of humility and respect for others, and the realities of family life, will emerge then.