This is a comprehensive book on how and why socialism will work, despite your friends saying it has and always will be a failure.Please note this book only contains two words and is entirely satire.
Starts out with a strong message and continues that theme throughout the book. At no point was I confused in what the author was trying to convey. Also, very quick read, was able to finish in one sitting. Looking forward to other books from the author in the future, such as “why Dictatorship works” and “why flat earth is correct.”
Lievesley brings an unique and historically accurate view to the argument regarding the feasibility of a socialist economic system.
He takes the complex history of the economics of states in which the masses controlled the means of production and craftily articulates their successes in compelling, yet easy-to-read, concepts.
It is an incredibly well researched book, to the point that I could not find a single inaccuracy on any of it's 160 pages.
As someone always opposed to socialism, was looking for a book proving that it can work. Here it is! This is the best book written on socialism, beating even the greatest works of von Mises and Rothbard.
I would also recommend the other book of the author - "Does Communism work?".
Interesting comprehensive insight on Socialism, its approaches and how it achieves its goal. Recommended reading for those who want to understand socialism better, engage in it and/or criticize it.
I can't believe I ever thought otherwise. Every point was fleshed out and made so clear, my capitalist mind simply shattered. Guess I should join the Communist party or something.
It embodies Karl Marks and Frederich Engels all together in, what I call, a true masterpiece. Their ideologies have never been transcribed to our modern society to such degree of dexterity and clarity. Every line of this book is worth your eye-time.
A real page repeater. Perfect for fans of minimalism… and Marximalism. Could’ve been an email. Or a tweet. Or a Post-it. Deeply consistent. Much like government bureaucracy. It says what it means, and means what it says. Again. And again.