As a 19-year-old Orthodox Christian and aspiring writer, I was initially thrilled to see that Georgia Briggs set out to write an explicitly Orthodox fiction book for young adults. I hope that this is a sign that there is an audience for this genre, and judging by the high praise on this site, I think there is.
I am not trying to be mean by giving this a one star rating. I am not trying to trash talk Georgia Briggs as a writer. There were parts of this book that I genuinely liked. The imagery toward the end with the sign of the cross leaving an imprint on peoples' bodies was truly beautiful, and it was very exciting to see the lives and inner dialogues of modern-day Orthodox characters in small ways (like how the protagonist, Euphrosyne, fantasizes about leaving out her shoes on St. Nicholas's day.) The saints showing up in the trailer during Liturgy... an icon saving Euphrosyne's life... these are all things I would love to see more of, but in a different context.
Why in a different context? Because while far from the worst offender out there, I feel that this book has significant pitfalls when it comes to characterization and world building that are not only never addressed, but grow as the book goes on. None of the characters felt genuine to me, and I couldn't help but feel that they were there more to support a conservative political worldview than to function as people the readers could love and care about. Please be warned, there are SPOILERS TO FOLLOW.
First off, I had an issue with Icon's premise. It asks me to assume a lot of things that I find very difficult to believe would happen in the USA, at least in the manner depicted. In the novel, professing Christianity is punishable by death, and Euphrosyne's entire family is killed because of this. Her name is changed to Hillary in an attempt to force her to integrate into a secular society. Now, I have no problem with this premise as a whole. Christians have faced persecution in the past and continue to do so today. I don't, however, believe that the way the government goes about eradicating Christianity in the novel makes much sense at all. They send officials to burn churches and execute people before they ban books such as A Wrinkle in Time and The Chronicles of Narnia from the children's section of the local libraries.
Maybe it's just me, but I feel like I'd make a better tyrant than the atheist government in this book. I would try to censor thought first by banning books and changing names before I skipped straight to burning down churches. I feel like that's how you get rebellions, not a shift in power. America is still around 70% Christian, at least nominally, according to Pew Research Center. I know from interviews with Georgia Briggs that she wasn't trying to predict the future of America and was more interested in exploring an alternate universe, which I respect, but I cannot get behind an AU which I think makes no logical sense. How did a 70% Christian population go down so incredibly quickly?
And why is Orthodoxy, in particular, represented as the biggest threat to the secular society throughout the novel? Dr. Snead is a character who works for the government and is a huge, anti-Christ type proponent of the persecution of Christians. He acts as a "counselor" to Euphrosyne and tries to get her to renounce her faith in Christ. He also often acts like Orthodoxy is the worst form of Christianity because it is the "least tolerant." But why is the government so afraid of Orthodox influence in America? Sad as it makes me, we make up about .5% of the population. That's less than the Mormon church. If the government suddenly decided the Orthodox church was a huge threat, they might actually do our numbers some good. I've lived in the Bible Belt since I was 10 years old, and many of my Protestant friends didn't even know what Orthodox Christianity was until they met me. Even then, some of them thought I must be Greek to be Orthodox. Some persecution might actually draw attention to what we are and boost our numbers. People might think of our cause as worthy if they started witnessing people unjustly dying for the Faith.
I promise, I'm not trying to be funny here. I know what I'm saying might sound ridiculous but I really feel that if Orthodox Christians started being martyred in America, people would take notice and would come to our aid, even if they were outside the faith, the same way that people flocked to Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr..
Back to my point about the Bible Belt and the obscurity of the Orthodox Faith in America - this is not a story set in Massachusetts, where there are many beautiful churches of various ethnicities located in Boston alone. It is set in Alabama, where Evangelical Christianity has a much stronger hold. For some reason, however, nearly everyone Euphrosyne runs into seems to have some prior connection to Orthodoxy for unexplained reasons. Mimi, her local librarian, is the most egregious example. Euphrosyne only discovers that she is secretly Orthodox because she wears her wedding ring on a different finger than most people. This strikes me as an unintelligent move on Mimi's part, as it could give her away very easily, but that aside, it's incredible that Euphrosyne just ran into her. I have a hard enough time finding people who are Orthodox when I walk around with my Hellenic College t-shirt in broad daylight. In a plot twist at the end of the novel, it even turns out that Dr. Snead was once a part of the Orthodox Church.
While I'm wondering since when so many people in Alabama were secretly Orthodox, I'm also left wondering where all other religions have disappeared to. Dr. Snead makes allusions to Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism in the book, but we never meet anyone from any of those faiths. Yet we are never told that any religion other than Christianity has suffered persecution. So where did the other religious people go? Surely there must be a Muslim or a Jew somewhere who objects to the persecution of Christians and is helping harbor some in safety? And why isn't the government concerned with the so-called "intolerance" of these other religions? They all have restrictions on how one should live, moral codes one should follow, etc. If the government supposedly hates these so much, then why are Christians the only ones getting persecuted?
Here, we come to the crux of my issues with the book. I know I'm writing long, and I don't mean to complain just for the sake of hearing my own voice, but I would never recommend this book to any young adult I know. Why? Because I feel that it feeds off fear to create a piece of propaganda aimed at young Orthodox Christians such as myself, and I, as a reader, don't want to accept that just because it is propaganda that happens to promote my own religious beliefs.
I know propaganda is a harsh term, but I can't think of a better way to put this. The characters are very black and white in this novel, with few exceptions. All non-Orthodox characters in this book support or at least stay silent while the government massacres Christians. This includes Euphrosyne's own grandfather, who acts as though the literal murder of his son isn't anything much to worry about. Dr. Snead is a terrible, bitter man, and the implication is that he became such when he questioned the Church's teachings. All Orthodox characters are good and forgiving, to the point that they feel more like philosophies than people. They do not have any input as to how to change their situation, and no plans are ever made to try to rebel against the government, or befriend agnostics/Jews/Muslims etc. to try to gain support (which, again, would be difficult, as we never see any evidence that characters of other faiths exist in this world). Euphrosyne is a passive protagonist, and the few times she makes decisions, it is mostly to follow what other characters have told her to do. She also feels more like a romanticized version of a twelve-year-old than how twelve-year-olds actually act. She isn't even comfortable thinking the word "sex" inside her own mind when she's read Speak, a very good YA book about rape, and doesn't know what Dr. Snead means by "free will" even though she's read Lois Lowry's The Giver and Madeleine L'Engel's A Wrinkle in Time, both excellent books that explore free will carefully as part of their central themes.
I feel that the overall message this book is trying to get across is a harmful one. It acts as though everyone who is not Orthodox is out to get Orthodox Christians, that Orthodox Christians cannot rely on anyone but people within our own religious group, and that only Orthodox Christians would be able to stand up to the government if persecution on this scale were to happen in America. In the one scene where we see other Christian kids of different denominations at the end of the novel, none of them are able to stand up to Dr. Snead except Euphrosyne. The implication (at least, as I read it) is that because Euphrosyne is Orthodox, she is stronger than the rest.
As I read this book, I saw many opportunities that I thought were missed. Perhaps it could have focused on Dr. Snead rather than on Euphrosyne. It would be interesting to see the story of a man who lost his faith and began persecuting Christians, a sort of "Paul in reverse," if you will. Or to tell the story of Mimi, who lost her husband and has to deal with temptations of revenge.
Right now, I see a book riddled with persecution complexes. I wouldn't want any future child of mine to read this book. I don't want them to grow up thinking that they will not find supportive, empathetic people outside of the Orthodox Faith, because they will. Some of my best friends are not Orthodox, and I know for a fact that if anything like this were ever to occur, they would fight tooth and nail for my right to practice my faith in peace. And yes, these are people on the political left, which this book seems to demonize.
If the image of Christ is in all mankind, then I do not want to support a book that seems to say the opposite. It disappoints me that this book is getting high reviews from other Orthodox writers I respect when I think that there should be a higher standard for Orthodox fiction. I am also disappointed that Ancient Faith felt that this work was fleshed out enough for publication.
If you are looking for a great book that explores similar themes without dehumanizing non-Christians, please consider reading That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis. And if you're a young adult looking for great Christian themes in literature, I would recommend other books that Georgia Briggs references in Icon (and spoils the endings of, sometimes, by the way). A Wrinkle in Time (and its sequels), The Giver, Harry Potter, the Hobbit, Narnia, and many other books have shaped my world, and I am glad that Briggs points to them as inspirations.
And to Georgia Briggs, if you ever read this, please know that I am not trying to be a troll. I feel like we would get along if we ever met - I love to write and we seem to have the same taste in books, not to mention that I also love to bake cookies and sing along with recordings of Russian men's choirs, as the back of your book stated you love to do. I hope you continue to write and that the rest of your Pascha season is blessed. Please correct me if I have made any errors concerning your work. Christ is Risen!