A mildly amusing but largely infuriating read. Not only is the author and narrator insufferable, her thoughts and conclusions throughout the novel are juvenile and self-congratulatory. Toward the beginning of this book, I had to check a couple times to make sure that this was actually nonfiction, because I could not believe that the author would willingly portray herself in the way she does. A bonafide 2000s period piece.
The author, multiple times throughout the book, touts herself as a feminist. She even provides this as justification for why she is initially against porn, as she believes it is misogynist in nature. Despite this, she is consistently dedicated to putting other women down, with no sign that she recognizes that this is wrong. She is a proud Harvard grad, and whether she knows it or not, is deeply condescending toward any women who aren't sufficiently intellectual for her tastes. She only begins to respect working in the porn industry as a choice for women when she learns that these women are using it as a pathway to more conventionally "respectable" industries, entirely ignoring the idea that this may be someone's chosen career for life. She excuses her partner Sam for cheating on a woman (Holly) with her because she dislikes Holly and because they both agree that Holly is stupid. She incessantly includes unnecessary dialogue with her mother simply so she can point out her mother's Chinese accent, something that is clearly meant to be funny but instead comes off as deeply pathetic.
In addition to her Chinese heritage, she also makes the incredibly irrelevant point of disparaging her Mexican ancestry by describing a city in Mexico (when it adds nothing to the narrative) as disgusting and filled with beggars who need to be fended off. Who is this for? I can't imagine it being worth it to mock my own mother, who worked hard to learn a language vastly different from her own, for the sake of a couple laughs from uncaring strangers. I don't see the benefit of giggling about the poverty in Ensenada on the off chance a reader might smile at the image of a homeless amputee.
She clearly has body image issues, which I would be sympathetic to, if not for the fact that she projects those issues onto the women around her and relays that back to us. Wendy, the salesperson for her sex toy party, is insulted dozens of times for being overweight. Carrillo-Gailey insists that she is not being mean, simply observing, but the fact is she is using this woman's weight as a way to further illustrate her dislike for Wendy. If she hadn't meant the "observation" to be negative, why is it couched in other criticisms of this woman? Her deep disgust for the female body is further shown by her juvenile reaction to the live taping of Dr. Block's sex show, where she, out loud, says "ewwwwww" (I believe she used more Ws than I did, but you get the point) to the sight of the inside of a woman's vagina. For the entirety of the scene, she goes into great detail about how awful she finds the show, that this other woman's body is just so gross and icky. After they leave the show, she and her partner say "good for her" when Dr. Block achieves her goal for the show, seemingly trying to show that actually she is very respectful and accepting of her work, despite the fact that she just spent the last dozen pages waxing on about how she wanted to throw up at the sight of the performers' bodies.
Going back to her partner, I am genuinely baffled that we are meant to like this man. We have reason to believe he cheats/attempts to cheat on two women (Sabine and Holly) in the time it takes for Carrillo-Gailey to officially get with him. Even if you agreed with the author's logic that Holly is vapid and mean (The reason she thinks this is because Holly insults another girl's weight. Ostensibly, it is bad when Holly does it, but Carrillo-Gailey is actually being very smart when she fatshames people, so it is fine), what about Sabine? Carrillo-Gailey even refers to her as "Super Sabine" because of her intelligence and accomplishments, so why is it that she excuses Sam's attempted infidelity in that case?
Her overarching conclusion is that women are drawn to softcore porn where men are drawn to hardcore. Ignoring the fact that this is essentially a repainted, adult version of "girls are better at emotional stuff and boys are better at physical stuff", she makes no effort to factor in her own personal biases when generalizing all women. She does not consider that her evident hatred for the naked human form might inform the distaste she has for seeing the full acts of sex.
I have many other issues with this book: why was she cool with her friend praying on barely legal boys? Why was she so awful to her ex-boyfriend when he acted more femininely that she personally liked? Why does she constantly feel the need to remark that women she meets are less hot than she was expecting? But I think my feelings can be summed up by describing the scene in this book that pissed me off the most.
Toward the beginning of the book, her knitting club is choosing a charitable cause to send their knitting to. Someone remarks that there is something bad happening in Somalia now, and they agree to send their wool sweaters and socks and whatever else there. The author then provides a retrospective about how, at the time, it was nearly a hundred degrees in Somalia, and how the suffering people there would likely be very surprised to be sent clothing that was so unfit for their climate. To me, this read like the kind of scene that would be used to illustrate in a novel how a character is wildly out-of-touch and uncaring about the suffering they claim to be trying to combat. her knitting club claim to send their work to people in need, but they don't actually care enough about the people in need to know what they are in need of.
This is a good analogy for this entire book, in my opinion. Carrillo-Gailey convinced herself she went on a mystical journey to open her mind to the world of pornography, but in actuality, she accepted the surface-level positives of the industry that appealed to her, and disrespected not only the people within that industry, but the people around her, both her friends and the people she dislikes. I hope to god she is embarrassed to look back on her work and realize what a horrible impression she left on anyone reading this with any kind of discernment.