What do you think?
Rate this book
Art and Its Significance: An Anthology of Aesthetic Theory
This anthology has been significantly expanded for this edition to include a wider range of contemporary issues. The most important addition is a new section on multicultural theory, including important and controversial selections ranging from discussions of art in other cultures to discussions of the appropriation of nonWestern art in Western cultures.
The material from Kant's Critique of Judgment has been expanded to include his writing on aesthetical ideas and the sublime. The selections from Derrida have been updated and considerably expanded for this edition, primarily from The Truth in Painting. One of Derrida's most interesting provocations has also been added, his letter to Peter Eisenman on architecture. In addition, the section on feminist theory now includes a chapter from Irigaray's Speculum of the Other Woman.
The anthology includes the most important writings on the theory of art in the Western tradition, including selections from Plato, Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Hegel, and Nietzsche; the most important philosophical writings of the last hundred years on the theory of art, including selections from Collingwood, Langer, Goodman, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty; contemporary Continental writings on art and interpretation, including selections from Gadamer, Ricoeur, Derrida, Lyotard, and Foucault; also writings on the psychology of art by Freud and Jung, from the Frankfurt School by Benjamin, Adorno, and Marcuse, in feminist theory, multiculturalism, and postmodernism. The anthology also includes twentieth-century writings by artists including discussions of futurism, suprematism, and conceptual art.
Stephen David Ross is Professor of Philosophy and Comparative Literature, State University of New York at Binghamton.
The material from Kant's Critique of Judgment has been expanded to include his writing on aesthetical ideas and the sublime. The selections from Derrida have been updated and considerably expanded for this edition, primarily from The Truth in Painting. One of Derrida's most interesting provocations has also been added, his letter to Peter Eisenman on architecture. In addition, the section on feminist theory now includes a chapter from Irigaray's Speculum of the Other Woman.
The anthology includes the most important writings on the theory of art in the Western tradition, including selections from Plato, Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Hegel, and Nietzsche; the most important philosophical writings of the last hundred years on the theory of art, including selections from Collingwood, Langer, Goodman, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty; contemporary Continental writings on art and interpretation, including selections from Gadamer, Ricoeur, Derrida, Lyotard, and Foucault; also writings on the psychology of art by Freud and Jung, from the Frankfurt School by Benjamin, Adorno, and Marcuse, in feminist theory, multiculturalism, and postmodernism. The anthology also includes twentieth-century writings by artists including discussions of futurism, suprematism, and conceptual art.
Stephen David Ross is Professor of Philosophy and Comparative Literature, State University of New York at Binghamton.
706 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1984
22 people are currently reading
283 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
November 20, 2010
I teach university-level aesthetics, and I find myself switching between this text and Hofstadter's "Philosophies of Art and Beauty." Neither does everything I'd like, but they represent the best of the rest.
I like the latter (Hofstadter) because of the depth of its selections and because it's not the least bit trendy (it boasts comprehensive selections from Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Augustine, Ficino, Shaftesbury, Kant, Schelling, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Croce, Dewey, and Heidegger--in other words, aside from Hume it includes the seminal texts from virtually every historically essential figure up to 1930 except Tolstoy.) But Hofstadter's book has no contemporary theory at all after Heidegger (and it lacks some critical sections from Kant).
Ross' anthology by contrast includes the really important material from Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche and Heidegger (which most other aesthetics anthologies do not), plus it has selections from Hume and Tolstoy and many contemporary figures of import like Bell, Collingwood, Dewey, Langer, Merleau-Ponty, Pepper, Hirsch, Gadamer, Ricoeur, Foucault, Bullough, Danto, Bakhtin, Freud, Jung, Benjamin, Adorno, Marcuse, Lyotard, Irigaray, and others (including some theoretically important artists like Kandinsky and Mandrian). But the early historical selections are much less comprehensive, and Ross includes no medieval or Renaissance writers at all. In short, the Hofstadter has better depth and the Ross has better breadth.
The third edition of "Art and Its Significance" is greatly improved over the second edition, mostly because it expanded the Kant section to include essential parts of Kant's third Critique that were puzzlingly absent from the earlier editions (though a few critical sections are still missing), and because it has enlarged the Derrida section to include more critical writings. That has certainly helped address the depth weakness, and perhaps pushes it to the top of the list. But in aiming for breadth in an apparent attempt to please everyone, Ross has included some selections that aren't nearly as important, influential or finely argued as texts by figures he chose to leave out (like Croce and Schopenhauer). To my mind, he would have done better to include some Bonaventure and Dante, for instance, and a little more material from Plato, Aristotle and Kant--who even now, are more widely read and more cogent than some of the additional writers Ross did include. In addition, too many of the excerpted selections are so oddly edited or include so little of the original text that the theory ends up being incomprehensible to someone who hasn't already read the excerpted text in its entirety.
In sum, if you want an anthology that comes close to sampling all the essential writers on the subject (past and present) and doing it fairly well, "Art and Its Significance" is one of your best choices, despite its nod to trendiness. And it's still one of the most reasonably priced philosophy of art anthologies available. But the cost of including so much material is that the material the text does include is too often abridged to the point of incomprehensibility.
I like the latter (Hofstadter) because of the depth of its selections and because it's not the least bit trendy (it boasts comprehensive selections from Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Augustine, Ficino, Shaftesbury, Kant, Schelling, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Croce, Dewey, and Heidegger--in other words, aside from Hume it includes the seminal texts from virtually every historically essential figure up to 1930 except Tolstoy.) But Hofstadter's book has no contemporary theory at all after Heidegger (and it lacks some critical sections from Kant).
Ross' anthology by contrast includes the really important material from Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche and Heidegger (which most other aesthetics anthologies do not), plus it has selections from Hume and Tolstoy and many contemporary figures of import like Bell, Collingwood, Dewey, Langer, Merleau-Ponty, Pepper, Hirsch, Gadamer, Ricoeur, Foucault, Bullough, Danto, Bakhtin, Freud, Jung, Benjamin, Adorno, Marcuse, Lyotard, Irigaray, and others (including some theoretically important artists like Kandinsky and Mandrian). But the early historical selections are much less comprehensive, and Ross includes no medieval or Renaissance writers at all. In short, the Hofstadter has better depth and the Ross has better breadth.
The third edition of "Art and Its Significance" is greatly improved over the second edition, mostly because it expanded the Kant section to include essential parts of Kant's third Critique that were puzzlingly absent from the earlier editions (though a few critical sections are still missing), and because it has enlarged the Derrida section to include more critical writings. That has certainly helped address the depth weakness, and perhaps pushes it to the top of the list. But in aiming for breadth in an apparent attempt to please everyone, Ross has included some selections that aren't nearly as important, influential or finely argued as texts by figures he chose to leave out (like Croce and Schopenhauer). To my mind, he would have done better to include some Bonaventure and Dante, for instance, and a little more material from Plato, Aristotle and Kant--who even now, are more widely read and more cogent than some of the additional writers Ross did include. In addition, too many of the excerpted selections are so oddly edited or include so little of the original text that the theory ends up being incomprehensible to someone who hasn't already read the excerpted text in its entirety.
In sum, if you want an anthology that comes close to sampling all the essential writers on the subject (past and present) and doing it fairly well, "Art and Its Significance" is one of your best choices, despite its nod to trendiness. And it's still one of the most reasonably priced philosophy of art anthologies available. But the cost of including so much material is that the material the text does include is too often abridged to the point of incomprehensibility.
June 9, 2020
Ross does a fantastic job of including a variety of ancient to modern thinkers. A very robust overview that includes the history and development of aesthetic theories. I return to this book again and again. Highly recommend.
Read
July 12, 2024*for school, not every single text included.
April 10, 2011
This is a very nice collection of exerpts from important philosophers from Plato up through Adorno. Stephen Ross is a brilliant professor of Philosophy, and this is a particularly fruitful text for those wanting a good survey of Philosohpy and Art.
November 26, 2010
Theres no way i will ever read this cover to cover. But we read many passages in my Aesthetics class, and its just readings from Aristotle and stuff. Not the easiest to understand, but interesting.
January 30, 2022
Probably one of the most comprehensive readers on a given subject I’ve ever come across.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews