50% DNF. I really can't believe how many good reviews this book has on Goodreads. It's like I was reading a different book than most of the other people on here. I have read Calling Dr. Laura and really like the drawing style of Georges, but after this book I don't think I'll be picking up anymore. To start, she decides to buy a dog for her boyfriend after getting a lukewarm ok from his mom. When the boyfriend's parents then say to the dog, Georges guilts her parents into letting her keep the dog. Georges names the dog Beija and proceeds to do NOTHING right with the her, such as training, socializing, or leash practice.
Eventually Georges and her boyfriend decide to get an apartment together and go with an apartment that does NOT allow pets. As a pet owner myself, I would NEVER even look at a place that did not allow pets as you are risking losing your pet! Once they are (inevitably) caught (because the dog was not trained in any fashion, she barks throughout the day while alone in the apartment). The couple then decides to tie up Beija ALL DAY behind a warehouse with some crusty punk kids in it, who don't harm the dog but also don't do anything to help her. Finally, Georges once again appeals to her parent's sympathy to take Beija back into their home. When Georges and her boyfriend begin the search for a new apartment the AGAIN SELFISHLY chose a no-pets-allowed place (*insert eyeroll, teeth grinding here*)
The story then takes the reader back to Georges childhood, where you somehow come to hate her as a person even MORE. She frequently captured lizards and other amphibians only to put them in peanut butter jars and let them DIE. She does this REPEATEDLY, even after seeing the animals are dying. She also owns a gerbil and turtle. Her older sister asks if Georges has given her gerbil fresh water lately, and her reply is a completely nonchalant "it's fine." At this point in the story, Georges attempts to push all the blame of her behavior onto her parents, as they are divorced. However, she also mentions her responsible older sister who constantly DOES try to help her-to no avail. I could not understand what made Georges feel justified in both blaming her parents AND continually forcing them into helping her.
Back in present day, Georges and her boyfriend move again-this time to a house where she can bring Beija (wow finally). She then gushes about their 'punk' lifestyle, allowing people in and out of the house to crash there. Beija has still not gone through any training and Georges constantly tells people (and the reader) that she is letting Beija just 'be herself' by lunging/growling/biting people. People constantly move out of the house in order to get away from this dog, but Georges once again deflects any blame onto herself. This is actually where I stopped reading the book in complete disgust. If a person is unable to care for their animals (eg. renting an apartment that doesn't allow pets, not taking the time to train/socialize them, or even just change their water dish) then they have a DUTY to find that pet an owner who CAN provide those things. I refuse to believe that Beija (or any other dog) is just 'bad' and should be left at that. With proper time and training, I'm sure she could have at least stopped lunging at people (even children!). Disgusted throughout my read.