Wow this was disappointing. I should say that I am disappointed. I just read 5K/Hr and LOVED it. Here are the things that I loved about that one and hated about this one. 5K, finally a writing book that wasn't filled with shameless self-promotion! Wow, a book where the cross-purpose of marketing their other books wasn't a constant interruption to what I actually wanted to read. This book, so much about the author's other books. So much.
Look at me, I wrote a bunch of books and I'm writing a bunch more and I'll give you ten minutes of actually helpful information although the whole book is so short you won't mind dropping four bucks on it. I do. I mind. I understand that he wants to use his own books for analytical purposes and I suppose it's better than another writing book that breaks down Star Wars as though that is the only story any how-to writing author has ever read, but he could have stuck with other books and not gone on about his own. It's what I hated about Write. Publish. Repeat.
This book had a completely different tone from 5K, much more similar to Write. Publish. Repeat. I also didn't like his language. 5K felt respectful to readers and writers and showed it in language and editing. Man, the editing was not so good in this one. Two missing words in one sentence on the chapter about not needing an editor. And I'm not the kind of writer who hangs onto the sanctity of using pro editors for every step. But two words. He could have listened to his computer read it aloud to him and caught those. The cursing I could do without. Maybe it's coming out from his sci-fi space thing he's writing. Yeah. We get to know all about that.
I was really looking forward to this book, to liking everything this guy wrote because it would all be as lovely, useful, and readable as 5K, but it's not. As far as I can tell, this writer has officially broached the 'How to make a million, write a book about how to make a million,' only this is, 'How to write a best-seller? Write a book about how to write a best-seller.'
I'm sure the information is good. I actually have some things I could say to validate his findings. My first series did not make it. Amazon promoted it a ton and it was incredibly awesome. Everyone who read it and made it through the whole thing said so. But it wasn't written to genre. I still can't nail whether it's paranormal, urban fantasy, horror, or literary. Yeah. Try designing a cover to communicate that. I am right now because I'm finally wrapping that monster of a series up and it has about a dozen readers. I love those readers. They are absolutely the best. But it's not making money. My other book, a little less convoluted, YA chick lit fantasy romance actually sells without the freakish amount of effort my other series required. I've realized that simplifying genre helps to be able to market clearly what your book is about, and it's easier to write. People like it more. I don't know if that means better, but I only ask whether my writing is good if I'm not doing it. I wrote 7,700 words yesterday so I have no doubts. Today I haven't counted. Man, this is a rambling review. Now I have to give a glowing five star to 5K.