Reading biographies are tricky endeavours since you never know whether what you read will reinforce your opinion of the author or extinguish all faith in their abilities.
I had always known that Austen came from marginal wealth and fell into relative poverty, I knew Austen lived through the time of the American Revolutionary War and the French Revolution but none of this really mattered when reading her novels before: but now they do. The fact that Austen chooses to not mention the political and social upheavals she personally or marginally experiences, for example, points to what matters (or doesn't) to her. This is disheartening for an Austen advocate. Now, her choice in focusing on marriages and matchmaking take a darker, more avoidant turn.
Honan's biography also has its problems, as so many reviewers have pointed out, most notably his inability to cull immediately relevant information for this biography but instead, vomits as much information from wayside characters that sometimes do (but often don't) have any impact on Austen's personal life. I understand the reason for this: he is presenting her life in full magnificence but he is also a bore in his meticulousness. What does end up happening is that we as readers see the characters she would eventually shape into her own novels as they are, devoid of authorial flourish. And this is what I'm getting at: her life was filled with people of little consequence, including Jane herself, who is presented as quite a snob, moody, and judgmental.
Unfortunately, after reading Jane Austen: Her Life, I find it hard to separate the woman from the art. The problem is, Art owes a lot of its privileges to their audience: it is within the audience to imbue what meaning we choose, to see nuance where a suggestion is made, to project our own personalities and experiences in the spaces in between and therefore, we afford artists, sometimes rightly but mostly wrongly, as our representatives. Biographies strip that romance and, in the hands of a good biographer, we see them with less bias.
So Honan achieves his objective: to present Austen's life as thoroughly and accurately as possible, lifting the veil and exhibiting Austen's life through painstaking and oftentimes tedious detail, but it doesn't mean I have to like it.
Two stars then: for onerous material cited but mostly from my own disappointment.