What do you think?
Rate this book
Protijed: Štěstí pro ty, kteří nemohou vystát pozitivní myšlení
Dá se žít spokojeně i ve světě, který vůbec nemáme pod kontrolou? Protijed přináší originální přístup k osobnímu rozvoji - konečně pochopíte, že koncept štěstí je fatální omyl. Co to je štěstí? Oliveru Burkemanovi došlo, po letech strávených rozhovory s psychology, filozofy i buddhisty, že se všichni shodují v jednom: POŘÁD SE HONÍME ZA ŠTĚSTÍM, A PRÁVĚ KVŮLI TOMU SE CÍTÍME TAK MIZERNĚ. Abychom byli opravdu šťastní, možná musíme být ochotní prožívat více negativních emocí nebo před nimi aspoň neutíkat.
Paperback
First published November 13, 2012
1777 people are currently reading
34113 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,656 reviews
Read
November 4, 2022This might be the only (so-called) self-help book that includes a quote from The Wire at the beginning of a chapter -- and surely that's a good sign.
I would have been content if this book had been what I expected: an acerbic expose of self-help hokum. Instead, it proved to be much more: a cogent synthesis of a number of philosophical and psychological notions and approaches that offer a healthier, more realistic, way of living a happier life. Drawing from Stoicism (the real thing, not the straw man version most of us hear about), Buddhism, and psychological studies that are critical of so-called positive thinking, what I found most striking about The Antidote was how often it seemed to articulate and complete my own half-formed ideas. Forcing yourself to "think positive" often makes failure that much more devastating; setting long-terms goals often means scuttling your well-being in the drive to achieve (and doubling down at the very moment it might make sense to abandon a bad idea); trying to feel motivated can create an extra thing to be frustrated and depressed about; there is comfort and relief to be found in contemplating worst-case-scenarios and even death itself rather than trying to emphasize the positive at all costs . . . and on and on.
To be clear: the approaches (note the plural) outlined in this book are not meant to help you achieve happiness in some defined, end-of-the-line, concrete sense. Instead it is a toolkit, a series of ways to approach life more realistically and genuinely. Somehow the positive-thought advocates have created the sense that their approach is about embracing life when, in fact, the opposite is true: their approach involves ignoring and denying much of what makes life what it is. What this book tries to do is offer some ways of finding happiness (rather than Being Happy) by taking in the totality of our lives rather than filtering out whatever we perceive as an obstacle to our goals.
I would have been content if this book had been what I expected: an acerbic expose of self-help hokum. Instead, it proved to be much more: a cogent synthesis of a number of philosophical and psychological notions and approaches that offer a healthier, more realistic, way of living a happier life. Drawing from Stoicism (the real thing, not the straw man version most of us hear about), Buddhism, and psychological studies that are critical of so-called positive thinking, what I found most striking about The Antidote was how often it seemed to articulate and complete my own half-formed ideas. Forcing yourself to "think positive" often makes failure that much more devastating; setting long-terms goals often means scuttling your well-being in the drive to achieve (and doubling down at the very moment it might make sense to abandon a bad idea); trying to feel motivated can create an extra thing to be frustrated and depressed about; there is comfort and relief to be found in contemplating worst-case-scenarios and even death itself rather than trying to emphasize the positive at all costs . . . and on and on.
To be clear: the approaches (note the plural) outlined in this book are not meant to help you achieve happiness in some defined, end-of-the-line, concrete sense. Instead it is a toolkit, a series of ways to approach life more realistically and genuinely. Somehow the positive-thought advocates have created the sense that their approach is about embracing life when, in fact, the opposite is true: their approach involves ignoring and denying much of what makes life what it is. What this book tries to do is offer some ways of finding happiness (rather than Being Happy) by taking in the totality of our lives rather than filtering out whatever we perceive as an obstacle to our goals.
September 21, 2015
Curmudgeonly Brit that I am, I enjoyed this book a lot. I read it at a gallop. I found it wonderfully provocative. I could have filled its margins with comments, heavily pressed into the paper, and accompanied by lots of exclamation marks.
The general drift of the book is that the roaring ra-ra-ra of positive thinking does not work. Day by day, in every way, we are NOT getting better and better. The author, Oliver Burkeman, a Guardian journalist covering psychology, says that instead we need to cultivate an attitude of reasonable pessimism. We need to distance ourselves from the ructions of our emotions and embrace the essence of the human condition - uncertainty and death. Surprisingly, he feels, therein lies the path to happiness - or at least the path to detachment, acceptance and contentment.
He discusses the Stoics, Buddhist philosophies and practices, and societies which embrace uncertainty rather than avoiding it. He talks of the merits of meditation, and of our current (misplaced) obsession with setting ourselves goals.
He also interestingly talks a lot about how most self-help books try and change our mindset. If we procrastinate...self help books will give us exercises to try and get us in the mood for doing what we have to do. That is the essence of how they work. Burkeman on the other hand supports the Buddhist approach of accepting one's moods as they are, and doing what one has to do in spite of how one is feeling. He cites Anthony Trollope, who unfailingly used to write for 3 hours each morning, before going off to his day job. He wrote 47 novels during his lifetime. He also quotes the artist Chuck Close: "Inspiration is for amateurs. The rest of us just show up and get to work."
But - but, but, but... I think this approach to life is only feasible if you are naturally a disciplined person. My father was. He was a Trollope through and through. I on the other hand am a jelly person. I need gentle encouragement and lots of treats in order to do anything. Strangely though this doesn't stop me aligning myself with the rather Spartan ideas put forward in the book.
I also find meditation awfully difficult. I have tried it on and off for about 40 years, and always get fed up with it after just a short time.
Finally, far from being the detached and philosophical being glowingly described by the author, I'm an old drama queen, who bangs the table about injustices, and get very upset when things go wrong.
For me that is the missing chapter in this book. Whilst I greatly admire a lot of what the author said, his ideas and suggestions are very much geared up to a certain sort of personality - and I am not that personality. The book was very interesting indeed,but it isn't going to alter the lifestyle or perspectives of an emotional jellied wimp like myself.
The general drift of the book is that the roaring ra-ra-ra of positive thinking does not work. Day by day, in every way, we are NOT getting better and better. The author, Oliver Burkeman, a Guardian journalist covering psychology, says that instead we need to cultivate an attitude of reasonable pessimism. We need to distance ourselves from the ructions of our emotions and embrace the essence of the human condition - uncertainty and death. Surprisingly, he feels, therein lies the path to happiness - or at least the path to detachment, acceptance and contentment.
He discusses the Stoics, Buddhist philosophies and practices, and societies which embrace uncertainty rather than avoiding it. He talks of the merits of meditation, and of our current (misplaced) obsession with setting ourselves goals.
He also interestingly talks a lot about how most self-help books try and change our mindset. If we procrastinate...self help books will give us exercises to try and get us in the mood for doing what we have to do. That is the essence of how they work. Burkeman on the other hand supports the Buddhist approach of accepting one's moods as they are, and doing what one has to do in spite of how one is feeling. He cites Anthony Trollope, who unfailingly used to write for 3 hours each morning, before going off to his day job. He wrote 47 novels during his lifetime. He also quotes the artist Chuck Close: "Inspiration is for amateurs. The rest of us just show up and get to work."
But - but, but, but... I think this approach to life is only feasible if you are naturally a disciplined person. My father was. He was a Trollope through and through. I on the other hand am a jelly person. I need gentle encouragement and lots of treats in order to do anything. Strangely though this doesn't stop me aligning myself with the rather Spartan ideas put forward in the book.
I also find meditation awfully difficult. I have tried it on and off for about 40 years, and always get fed up with it after just a short time.
Finally, far from being the detached and philosophical being glowingly described by the author, I'm an old drama queen, who bangs the table about injustices, and get very upset when things go wrong.
For me that is the missing chapter in this book. Whilst I greatly admire a lot of what the author said, his ideas and suggestions are very much geared up to a certain sort of personality - and I am not that personality. The book was very interesting indeed,but it isn't going to alter the lifestyle or perspectives of an emotional jellied wimp like myself.
September 8, 2024
Murphy's Law symbolize the error-prone nature of people and processes. This book shows how possibly the culture of positive thinking and cult of optimism can go wrong and how Murphy's law is applicable to it. Anything that can go wrong, will.
The book remains true to its title. It is really meant for the people who can't stand 'positive thinking', 'cult of optimism' kind of approaches to happiness. What this book does is that it shows a new and counter-intuitive approach to happiness- NEGATIVE PATH to HAPPINESS. The negative path to happiness involves embracing failures, insecurity and uncertainty in one's life.
The best thing I liked about the book is that the way in which author has shown the limits, disadvantages and futility of these popular cult of positive thinking and optimism kind of approaches (without being sarcastic :p ).
To quote an example from book:
"It is not certitude, comfort or any desired mental state (such as, calm) as we normally think of them, but rather the ' strange, excited comfort of being presented with, and grappling with, the tremendous mysteries life offers'."
Ultimately, what defines the cult of optimism and positive thinking (even in most mystically new age reforms) is that it abhors a mystery. It seeks to make things certain, to make happiness permanent and final. And it is precisely this that hurts and makes people prone to suffering.
One line from Murphy's law sums this up: Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes it worse. Read the book to find it how.
Its highly recommended for those who really can't stand positive thinking and want something more worthwhile and satisfying.
The book remains true to its title. It is really meant for the people who can't stand 'positive thinking', 'cult of optimism' kind of approaches to happiness. What this book does is that it shows a new and counter-intuitive approach to happiness- NEGATIVE PATH to HAPPINESS. The negative path to happiness involves embracing failures, insecurity and uncertainty in one's life.
The best thing I liked about the book is that the way in which author has shown the limits, disadvantages and futility of these popular cult of positive thinking and optimism kind of approaches (without being sarcastic :p ).
To quote an example from book:
"It is not certitude, comfort or any desired mental state (such as, calm) as we normally think of them, but rather the ' strange, excited comfort of being presented with, and grappling with, the tremendous mysteries life offers'."
Ultimately, what defines the cult of optimism and positive thinking (even in most mystically new age reforms) is that it abhors a mystery. It seeks to make things certain, to make happiness permanent and final. And it is precisely this that hurts and makes people prone to suffering.
One line from Murphy's law sums this up: Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes it worse. Read the book to find it how.
Its highly recommended for those who really can't stand positive thinking and want something more worthwhile and satisfying.
January 8, 2013
This might be my favorite self-help book of all time. In a nutshell, rather than trying to force ourselves to be cheerful when we don't feel cheerful by thinking positively, it suggests we think of the worst thing that can happen and realize that whatever that worst thing is, it isn't likely to be the end of the world. On procrastination, it suggests we stop trying to feel motivated and just do what we have to do--moods and actions don't have to be related. On goals, it explores whether goal striving brings happiness or might actually be counter productive. As someone who has spent the last 30 years reading self help books with optimism of making meaningful changes that will transform me into the person I wish to be, this is a welcome change of pace. Over the past few weeks, I've been just accepting whatever mood I'm in and getting on with what I have to do in my day, and I feel happier already. An added bonus is that when I ask myself what the what is the worst thing that will happen if I don't do something like flossing my teeth, I find that while it isn't the end of the world, I really prefer not to have them all rot and fall out, so I am, ironically, finding the motivation after all. There is much, much more, but I find it interesting that the one book that basically tells us to quit trying is impacting me.
November 15, 2015
What a clever and amusing and interesting and thoughtful book! I need more adjectives to describe how much I enjoyed this look at happiness in the modern world.
Oliver Burkeman is a journalist who was skeptical of the "cult of optimism," and he digs into the research on positive thinking and talks to various experts in the field. The first thing he learns is that you can't suppress negative thoughts — suppression doesn't work. Whatever idea you are trying to squash down will only continue to pop up.
One of my favorite chapters was about goal setting, and how becoming obsessed with achieving goals can sometimes have damaging consequences, such as a financial crisis, or in the case of some Mount Everest climbers, even death. Another interesting chapter was on stoicism, and on recognizing that things could always be worse. There were also good sections on overcoming fear of failure and embarrassment.
There were so many fascinating parts of this book that I think I'll have to reread it. I listened to this on audio, and I enjoyed Burkeman's narration. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in popular psychology research.
Favorite Quote
"The point here is not that negative capability is always superior to the positive kind. Optimism is wonderful; goals can sometimes be useful; even positive thinking and positive visualization have their benefits. The problem is that we have developed the habit of chronically overvaluing positivity and the skills of 'doing' in how we think about happiness, and that we chronically undervalue negativity and the 'not-doing' skills, such as resting in uncertainty or getting friendly towards failure. To use an old cliche of therapy-speak, we spend too much of our lives seeking 'closure.' Even those of us who mock such cliches are often motivated by a craving to put an end to uncertainty and anxiety, whether by convincing ourselves that the future is bright, or by resigning ourselves despondently to the expectation that it won't be. What we need more of, instead, is what the psychologist Paul Pearsall called 'openture.' Yes, this is an awkward neologism. But its very awkwardness is a reminder of the spirit that it expresses, which includes embracing imperfection and easing up on the search for neat solutions."
Oliver Burkeman is a journalist who was skeptical of the "cult of optimism," and he digs into the research on positive thinking and talks to various experts in the field. The first thing he learns is that you can't suppress negative thoughts — suppression doesn't work. Whatever idea you are trying to squash down will only continue to pop up.
One of my favorite chapters was about goal setting, and how becoming obsessed with achieving goals can sometimes have damaging consequences, such as a financial crisis, or in the case of some Mount Everest climbers, even death. Another interesting chapter was on stoicism, and on recognizing that things could always be worse. There were also good sections on overcoming fear of failure and embarrassment.
There were so many fascinating parts of this book that I think I'll have to reread it. I listened to this on audio, and I enjoyed Burkeman's narration. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in popular psychology research.
Favorite Quote
"The point here is not that negative capability is always superior to the positive kind. Optimism is wonderful; goals can sometimes be useful; even positive thinking and positive visualization have their benefits. The problem is that we have developed the habit of chronically overvaluing positivity and the skills of 'doing' in how we think about happiness, and that we chronically undervalue negativity and the 'not-doing' skills, such as resting in uncertainty or getting friendly towards failure. To use an old cliche of therapy-speak, we spend too much of our lives seeking 'closure.' Even those of us who mock such cliches are often motivated by a craving to put an end to uncertainty and anxiety, whether by convincing ourselves that the future is bright, or by resigning ourselves despondently to the expectation that it won't be. What we need more of, instead, is what the psychologist Paul Pearsall called 'openture.' Yes, this is an awkward neologism. But its very awkwardness is a reminder of the spirit that it expresses, which includes embracing imperfection and easing up on the search for neat solutions."
December 29, 2014
I used to do the lab. work for a local group of oncologists, and one evening I heard someone crying in the waiting room. The rest of the staff had left and the doctors were doing rounds, so I went to see what was going on. I found a patient sitting there, crying quietly. She had been in remission twice, but had recently relapsed. She said she needed to talk to one of the doctors because she didn't know what she was doing wrong. When we talked further, she said she had been using some visualization tapes, where you are directed to imagine that lasers or your vigilante white cells are killing your tumor. She had also been using some “positive thinking for cancer patients” tapes where you are told to repeat, “I am healthy” and “I am cancer-free.” She was incredibly upset, not so much by the cancer, but because she felt that her inability to cure herself with positive thinking meant that she was doing something wrong and it was her fault. For me, that moment confirmed that positive thinking, used in the wrong circumstances and for the wrong reasons, can do more harm than good. The Antidote explores that interesting idea.
Oliver Burkeman is not out to bash positive thinking, but rather to explore “the negative path”, the idea that the more we search for happiness and security, the less we achieve them. This is done through chapters on Stoicism, the ways goals can be counterproductive or destructive, insecurity, the non-attachment of Zen Buddhism, failure, and our fear of death. He presents ideas about what might make our lives less unhappy, but this isn't in the typical self-help form of strict rules or a program to be blindly followed.
The conclusions Burkeman seems to come to are to embrace insecurity, and stop searching for happiness and quick fixes. Rather than thinking about everything in a positive way, it is much better to see things realistically, accurately, and truthfully. That is a philosophy I wholeheartedly agree with.
Oliver Burkeman is not out to bash positive thinking, but rather to explore “the negative path”, the idea that the more we search for happiness and security, the less we achieve them. This is done through chapters on Stoicism, the ways goals can be counterproductive or destructive, insecurity, the non-attachment of Zen Buddhism, failure, and our fear of death. He presents ideas about what might make our lives less unhappy, but this isn't in the typical self-help form of strict rules or a program to be blindly followed.
The conclusions Burkeman seems to come to are to embrace insecurity, and stop searching for happiness and quick fixes. Rather than thinking about everything in a positive way, it is much better to see things realistically, accurately, and truthfully. That is a philosophy I wholeheartedly agree with.
April 15, 2022
The Antidote is, in many ways, a reverse self-help book. Where most self-help or motivational books preach messages like "think positively" or "set goals and relentlessly pursue them", The Antidote makes a compelling and well-constructed argument that these habits can actually be bad for you, and that doing the exact opposite may lead you to a happier and more authentic life.
The book is composed of eight chapters, covering a variety of subjects in this vein, and an epilogue at the end. Topics covered include Stoicism, Buddhist "non-attachment", goal-setting, the self, insecurity, failure, and death. Each chapter covers these topics in a reverse way to how you would normally think about them: how you should embrace insecurity instead of seeking security, how you should not excessively set and focus on goals, how you should embrace your failures instead of hiding or ignoring them, and how you should think more about death and your own mortality as a way of facing it, instead of thinking you are immortal and will live forever.
It's an incredibly refreshing and enlightening take on these topics, and I found it to be very insightful and eye-opening. I definitely came away from this book with some new things I can incorporate into my daily life to try to look at things a bit differently and maybe live a fuller and more satisfying life. Burkeman is also a very good storyteller. The book isn't just filled with statistics and information, though there is some of that; instead, it's told in a narrative fashion, incorporating parts of interviews Burkeman did with various individuals as well as interesting stories from the real world.
Though it was mostly a positive experience, there were a few minor things I didn't like about this book. At one point, the author is talking about meditation, and describes a meditation retreat he went on for a week. I thought he was rambling in this section, and thought it was way too long. It came across as somewhat self-absorbed to me, and I didn't feel like it really added anything meaningful to the book.
I also personally believe he mentioned some questionable sources and materials in some places in the book. The most notable of these is Dr. Christopher Kayes. Burkeman mentions Kayes throughout the book, and focuses heavily on his book about the 1996 Mount Everest disaster in one of the chapters. The problem I see with this is that when you look Kayes up on Goodreads or Amazon, his books appear to be incredibly fringe, and largely unreviewed. On Goodreads, Kayes is listed as having published seven books. These books have a combined total of sixteen ratings and just one review. Worse yet, his cumulative star rating is only a meager 3.25 stars, and some of his books have a one-star rating. And the Everest book Burkeman heavily mentions only has seven ratings, and not a single review.
It's not much better on Amazon either. On the U.S. Amazon site, his Everest book only has one review. This might just be me, but when a book that otherwise seems mostly grounded in sound psychology and that presents well-reasoned arguments based on data chooses to focus a lot on a poorly and almost entirely unreviewed author and his work, that bothers me. It's not that people just don't read books about the 1996 Mount Everest disaster either; the most famous book on this topic, Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer, has over four hundred thousand reviews on Goodreads alone, and averages 4.21 stars. So Burkeman's choice of source here is a bit unsettling to me. I understand why he chose to focus on Kayes' book instead--Kayes' theory for the cause of the disaster fits more closely with the narrative of Burkeman's book--but for me it's still bothersome.
Other reviewers have mentioned this, but Burkeman also goes on at length about how this is not a self-help book. I found his reasoning to be flimsy, and personally do think this is a form of self-help book. At the end of the day, Burkeman, in a way, admits in his epilogue that the purpose of this book is to show you a different way of thinking so you can possibly live a happier and more authentic life. As the information in this book will undoubtedly be used for this purpose, and Burkeman admits he has even used some of its information to improve his own life, this is fundamentally a self-help book, whether he likes it or not, and so I found his attempts to argue otherwise to be silly and illogical.
I also was quite lukewarm toward this book until about the 30% mark, after the Everest chapter. After that the book becomes progressively better and more interesting, but before that point I could have easily DNF'd it, and probably would have, except for the fact that, like most self-help books (get over it, Burkeman!), it was incredibly expensive, and so I felt I needed to read it to its conclusion to get my money's worth. It's great that it eventually got a lot better, I just wish the first 30% of the book held my interest more.
Not without its flaws, The Antidote is otherwise brilliant, refreshing, and genuinely enlightening. It is a must-read for those who have not had much luck with traditional self-help books in the past, but is worth checking out in general.
Highly recommended!
4.5 stars
The book is composed of eight chapters, covering a variety of subjects in this vein, and an epilogue at the end. Topics covered include Stoicism, Buddhist "non-attachment", goal-setting, the self, insecurity, failure, and death. Each chapter covers these topics in a reverse way to how you would normally think about them: how you should embrace insecurity instead of seeking security, how you should not excessively set and focus on goals, how you should embrace your failures instead of hiding or ignoring them, and how you should think more about death and your own mortality as a way of facing it, instead of thinking you are immortal and will live forever.
It's an incredibly refreshing and enlightening take on these topics, and I found it to be very insightful and eye-opening. I definitely came away from this book with some new things I can incorporate into my daily life to try to look at things a bit differently and maybe live a fuller and more satisfying life. Burkeman is also a very good storyteller. The book isn't just filled with statistics and information, though there is some of that; instead, it's told in a narrative fashion, incorporating parts of interviews Burkeman did with various individuals as well as interesting stories from the real world.
Though it was mostly a positive experience, there were a few minor things I didn't like about this book. At one point, the author is talking about meditation, and describes a meditation retreat he went on for a week. I thought he was rambling in this section, and thought it was way too long. It came across as somewhat self-absorbed to me, and I didn't feel like it really added anything meaningful to the book.
I also personally believe he mentioned some questionable sources and materials in some places in the book. The most notable of these is Dr. Christopher Kayes. Burkeman mentions Kayes throughout the book, and focuses heavily on his book about the 1996 Mount Everest disaster in one of the chapters. The problem I see with this is that when you look Kayes up on Goodreads or Amazon, his books appear to be incredibly fringe, and largely unreviewed. On Goodreads, Kayes is listed as having published seven books. These books have a combined total of sixteen ratings and just one review. Worse yet, his cumulative star rating is only a meager 3.25 stars, and some of his books have a one-star rating. And the Everest book Burkeman heavily mentions only has seven ratings, and not a single review.
It's not much better on Amazon either. On the U.S. Amazon site, his Everest book only has one review. This might just be me, but when a book that otherwise seems mostly grounded in sound psychology and that presents well-reasoned arguments based on data chooses to focus a lot on a poorly and almost entirely unreviewed author and his work, that bothers me. It's not that people just don't read books about the 1996 Mount Everest disaster either; the most famous book on this topic, Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer, has over four hundred thousand reviews on Goodreads alone, and averages 4.21 stars. So Burkeman's choice of source here is a bit unsettling to me. I understand why he chose to focus on Kayes' book instead--Kayes' theory for the cause of the disaster fits more closely with the narrative of Burkeman's book--but for me it's still bothersome.
Other reviewers have mentioned this, but Burkeman also goes on at length about how this is not a self-help book. I found his reasoning to be flimsy, and personally do think this is a form of self-help book. At the end of the day, Burkeman, in a way, admits in his epilogue that the purpose of this book is to show you a different way of thinking so you can possibly live a happier and more authentic life. As the information in this book will undoubtedly be used for this purpose, and Burkeman admits he has even used some of its information to improve his own life, this is fundamentally a self-help book, whether he likes it or not, and so I found his attempts to argue otherwise to be silly and illogical.
I also was quite lukewarm toward this book until about the 30% mark, after the Everest chapter. After that the book becomes progressively better and more interesting, but before that point I could have easily DNF'd it, and probably would have, except for the fact that, like most self-help books (get over it, Burkeman!), it was incredibly expensive, and so I felt I needed to read it to its conclusion to get my money's worth. It's great that it eventually got a lot better, I just wish the first 30% of the book held my interest more.
Not without its flaws, The Antidote is otherwise brilliant, refreshing, and genuinely enlightening. It is a must-read for those who have not had much luck with traditional self-help books in the past, but is worth checking out in general.
Highly recommended!
4.5 stars
December 18, 2012
It's such a turnoff with self-help books that start out with ridiculing self-helps books only to try to paint themselves in a different light. Turnoff and common, that is. This book is no different. It becomes especially obnoxious when the author denounces other authors lack of rigor only to himself use ancient Greek philosophy and Alan Watts as backbones to his arguments. Now, stoicism and Buddhist metaphysics are favorite subjects of mine. My problem with the book is not lack of rigor but the inconsistency between what the author argues one should expect from others and what he does himself.
I'd imagine that this book can serve as an overview and an introduction to another way to view life. Once one is somewhat familiar with the subject, I'd instead recommend to read primary sources and more focused commentary on them, for example Seneca, A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy, Les sagesses antiques, and of course Alan Watts.
I'd imagine that this book can serve as an overview and an introduction to another way to view life. Once one is somewhat familiar with the subject, I'd instead recommend to read primary sources and more focused commentary on them, for example Seneca, A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy, Les sagesses antiques, and of course Alan Watts.
April 15, 2022
Originally published as The Antidote: Happiness for People Who Can't Stand Positive Thinking
I have always had a sort of love-hate relationship with positive thinking.
On the one hand, telling myself that things'll work out somehow, helped silence my panic-stricken rants. Though truth be told, these rants where mostly caused by reckless lack of studying for some of the most difficult exams in my life.
On the other hand, everyone's luck runs out EVENTUALLY, and no amount of believing in oneself would magically fill one's mind with heretofore unknown Computer Networking theory.
I was recommended this book, at a time when I had just left a job due to severe burn-out, so I was expecting at least a LITTLE BIT of help from a book (sub)titled Happiness for people who can't stand positive thinking. So it came as a complete shock, when the first chapter pushed me into an even deeper depression. All it took, was reading a few small anecdotes about some well-known (to people OTHER than me) motivational speakers, who sooner or later ended up going bankrupt.
So now I was depressed, scared witless, and also on the brink of starting a new job I wasn't entirely sure I had chosen wisely. My reaction was to run of course, i.e. spending the following month attempting to glarethe book into submission. This had about the same effect, as John Oliver and Rachel Dratch cursing Lupus into submission, pictured here below for your convenience.
In the end, the looming 1-month deadline I had set myself, was nearly upon me, so I sucked it up and finished the book in under half a day. And strangely enough, I hadnever rarely felt better.
It had opened my eyes to what it meant to be a stoic: by no means one of those Hindu enlightened person to walk on hot coals. And most definitely not a saint who will suffer abuse till the end of time. Accepting that things are bad, doesn't stop you from removing yourself from being under their influence.
Then there was the absolutely perfect chapter on meditation. I could literally relate to every single piece of frustration, acceptance, and calmness of the author. It was no wonder, seeing as my first (and only) attempt at meditation had gone something like: "breathe iiiiii- IWantToBuyALamp -in, hold your breath, breathe ooooouu- StopPicturingLampShadesDammit -uut...".
To be fair, this wasn't one of those books that I could just... get. Aside from the fearful first chapter, there was this chapter on getting over oneself. Literally. In a nutshell: I am me, but not really, but me and my environment, but also not really either, but yes, but no, but... so on and so forth. I (yes I, ME along with MYSELF) gave up at that point, and continued reading the rest of the chapter, while simultaneously tuning it all out.
Score: 4/5 stars
By the end of it I actually felt good about stuff: the book, myself, the world in general, etc. So I didn't know if things would work out. I still wasn't sure about my new job, or even... anything really. However I also wasn't feeling the need to ruminate over the fact that (some) of my randomly set goals were nowhere near complete.
I have always had a sort of love-hate relationship with positive thinking.
On the one hand, telling myself that things'll work out somehow, helped silence my panic-stricken rants. Though truth be told, these rants where mostly caused by reckless lack of studying for some of the most difficult exams in my life.
On the other hand, everyone's luck runs out EVENTUALLY, and no amount of believing in oneself would magically fill one's mind with heretofore unknown Computer Networking theory.
I was recommended this book, at a time when I had just left a job due to severe burn-out, so I was expecting at least a LITTLE BIT of help from a book (sub)titled Happiness for people who can't stand positive thinking. So it came as a complete shock, when the first chapter pushed me into an even deeper depression. All it took, was reading a few small anecdotes about some well-known (to people OTHER than me) motivational speakers, who sooner or later ended up going bankrupt.
So now I was depressed, scared witless, and also on the brink of starting a new job I wasn't entirely sure I had chosen wisely. My reaction was to run of course, i.e. spending the following month attempting to glare
In the end, the looming 1-month deadline I had set myself, was nearly upon me, so I sucked it up and finished the book in under half a day. And strangely enough, I had
It had opened my eyes to what it meant to be a stoic: by no means one of those Hindu enlightened person to walk on hot coals. And most definitely not a saint who will suffer abuse till the end of time. Accepting that things are bad, doesn't stop you from removing yourself from being under their influence.
Then there was the absolutely perfect chapter on meditation. I could literally relate to every single piece of frustration, acceptance, and calmness of the author. It was no wonder, seeing as my first (and only) attempt at meditation had gone something like: "breathe iiiiii- IWantToBuyALamp -in, hold your breath, breathe ooooouu- StopPicturingLampShadesDammit -uut...".
To be fair, this wasn't one of those books that I could just... get. Aside from the fearful first chapter, there was this chapter on getting over oneself. Literally. In a nutshell: I am me, but not really, but me and my environment, but also not really either, but yes, but no, but... so on and so forth. I (yes I, ME along with MYSELF) gave up at that point, and continued reading the rest of the chapter, while simultaneously tuning it all out.
Score: 4/5 stars
By the end of it I actually felt good about stuff: the book, myself, the world in general, etc. So I didn't know if things would work out. I still wasn't sure about my new job, or even... anything really. However I also wasn't feeling the need to ruminate over the fact that (some) of my randomly set goals were nowhere near complete.
April 21, 2022
This book contains:
Stoicism, Buddhism, Psychology, Meditation, etc.
as relevant ideas and actionable techniques.
"Anyone can become somewhat Stoic, or a bit more Buddhist, or practise memento mori a little more frequently; unlike far too many selfhelp schemes, which purport to be comprehensive guides to life, the negative path to happiness isn’t an all-or-nothing affair. True negative capability entails moderation and balance and refraining from too much effortful struggling - including in the practice of negative capability. ‘Proficiency and the results of proficiency’, wrote Aldous Huxley, ‘come only to those who have learned the paradoxical art of doing and not doing, of combining relaxation with activity, of letting go as a person in order that the immanent and transcendent Unknown Quantity may take hold.’"
Stoicism, Buddhism, Psychology, Meditation, etc.
as relevant ideas and actionable techniques.
"Anyone can become somewhat Stoic, or a bit more Buddhist, or practise memento mori a little more frequently; unlike far too many selfhelp schemes, which purport to be comprehensive guides to life, the negative path to happiness isn’t an all-or-nothing affair. True negative capability entails moderation and balance and refraining from too much effortful struggling - including in the practice of negative capability. ‘Proficiency and the results of proficiency’, wrote Aldous Huxley, ‘come only to those who have learned the paradoxical art of doing and not doing, of combining relaxation with activity, of letting go as a person in order that the immanent and transcendent Unknown Quantity may take hold.’"
March 18, 2019
The subtitle here is the hook: “Happiness for People Who Can’t Stand Positive Thinking”. Many of the ideas presented within these pages were already at least vaguely familiar to me, especially those of the Stoics and at least some of the Buddhists. But, really, the word “happiness” is out of place. Even before the Stoics existed, wise Greeks had recognized “call no man happy until he is dead,” and Burkeman’s thrust here is that striving for happiness is almost certainly a bad idea.
A better goal is “acceptance”, and several variations on that are presented. This is a very good (albeit not perfect) book, illustrating several schools of thought that bear on the issue of happiness — or contentment, or acceptance; there are definite nuances.
An amusing and snarky appraisal of the world of self-help books and motivational speakers starts the book, but it starts delivering strongly in chapter two, What Would Seneca Do? If you look up “stoicism” in a dictionary, you really aren’t likely to get a good grip on the concept. The first definition Google hands out is “the endurance of pain or hardship without a display of feelings and without complaint”, but there is a fundamental flaw in that, which is that “display” isn’t the point. The second definition refers to the philosophy of Zeno, the Greek founder of the the school, and tells us Stoics will be “indifferent to the vicissitudes of fortune and to pleasure and pain.” That still seems a bit off, but that might have to do with five hundred years of evolution from Zeno to Marcus Aurelius.
Burkeman zeroes in on the same thing that Shakespeare put in the mouth of Hamlet: “for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” When you are stuck on a plane with a crying baby in the seat behind you, what makes it unbearable isn’t inherent in the baby’s act, but in your reception of it. A Stoic will observe and negate that aspect of that reception, which makes it much easier for that “hardship” to be “endured”. Not easy, no; but there’s a trick that helps. The subtitle of the chapter is The Stoic Art of Confronting the Worst-Case Scenario.
Ponder the difference between a terrible situation and a merely undesirable one, and the latter becomes much easier to tolerate. He extensively quotes the renowned psychologist Albert Ellis. “Even if you were murdered, ‘that is very bad, but not one-hundred percent bad,’ because several of your loved ones could meet the same fate, ‘and that would be worse. If you are tortured to death slowly, you could always be tortured to death slower.’” So that crying baby could have been accompanied by an older kid kicking the back of your seat, and parents who are discussing the wit and wisdom of, say, a political pundit whom you despise. And the flight could be from New York to Sydney, instead of merely to Los Angeles.
This trick comes into play later on, as well. The motivational gurus would have us only think positive thoughts, but the lesson here is that we could easily be better off by examining the negative — that worst-case scenario. After all, someone fixated on the best outcome imaginable will be disappointed much more often. It could be asserted that focusing on the positive helps one push harder to attain one’s goals, but the evidence for that is pretty weak. A later chapter (The Museum of Failure) reminds us of the effect, here, of the survivor’s bias: people that don’t succeed seldom are eager to talk about it, so we get the distorted of what conditions pertain to success.
I found the next chapter, on the Buddhist take on this problem, to be moderately enlightening. I’ve always been attracted to Buddhism, and in the past year or so I’ve realized why. When I think of Buddhism, I pretty much narrow it down to Stoicism-plus-Meditation. There are quite obviously many ways in which this is gonna be wrong, but I’m comfortable with it. There are aspects that completely repel me (“To the Buddha the entire teaching is just the understanding of dukkha, the unsatisfactory nature of all phenomenal existence, and the understanding of the way out of this unsatisfactoriness.” I mean, I just don’t think existence is all that bad. I suspect things were worse in India twenty-five centuries ago, though.)
I’m not sure how accurate he is, but Burkeman explains a key difference between the acceptance of the Stoic and that of the Buddhist.
But I don’t think that all of existence is suffering, and I plan to continue to perceive bad and good as judgmentally distinct. So, given that, I’m firmly in the Stoic camp, right? Well, remember part of that definition? “Indifferent to the vicissitudes of fortune and to pleasure and pain.” I don’t really want to be indifferent for pleasure. Next time I’ve got a dentist jabbing my mouth with sharp things, I’ll try to use theJedi Vulcan Stoic Mind Trick to remain unperturbed by my suffering. But next time I’m up in the mountains, gawping at the magnificence of snowmelt crashing over granite cliffs, I certainly don’t want to preceive that as merely “another set of circumstances”. To the analytically inclined, my goal would be to focus this skill more on the unpleasant side of the Gaussian distribution of life experiences.
The next few chapters engage in some specious over-intellectualizing along with some very good stuff. The central idea returns, more or less, to the introductory chapter’s dismissal of striving for happiness, although the goal being strived for shifts to “security” or “success”, etc. To strive is, obviously, not the same as to attain. And for many goals, the dilemma is that the act of striving can work against the attainment. The author interviews the security expert Bruce Schneier (whose fairly recent book I gave five stars to, and I’ll plug here) in noting that the efforts of the developed world to feel safe in the last dozen years has almost certainly rendered us objectively less safe, in addition to other costs, some of them worse. A visit to the staggeringly poor slum of Kibera (part of Nairobi) helps remind us that happiness doesn’t correlate strongly with wealth, and (surprise!) those who see wealth as a primary goal are probably among the least happy of all of us.
The bad logic comes in when he tries to make the case that we are all one. Well, he denies that precise formulation, but there’s a lot like that. I mean stuff like this: “There cannot be a ‘you’ without an ‘everything else’, and attempting to think about one in isolation from the other makes no sense.” I don’t want to belabor this review with that, though. The book is very good in spite of it, so just wade through the mystical junk and everything will be fine.
When you get to the Museum of Failure, he’s back on pretty firm ground. The chapter ends with an excerpt from the famous commencement speech J.K. Rowling made at Harvard in 2008 (text, video), in which she talks up the benefits of failure. Burkeman rightly differentiates two ideas. Those that think like our sneered-at motivational speakers will argue that failure is inevitable on the way to the top, and expecting it and getting over it is healthy. Living in San Francisco, I swear almost every time I hear an entrepreneur speak they’re touting their failures like merit badges. But that still focuses on the striving, not on acceptance, and for most of us there is no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. The other perspective is the one that Rowling also points to: absolute failure is liberating. (Yeah, duh, it is indeed a little ironic, given that it liberated Rowling to become staggeringly successful and wealthy.) You can think of it as something like “there’s no way to go but up!”, but that isn’t the point. If your goal is still “up”, then you’ve missed the point.
The book ends well with the last chapter, Memento Mori. Death is, after all, the ultimate failure. Steve Jobs is quoted, aptly: “Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked.” This returns nicely to the lessons of the Stoics; the Roman general who chose to have a slave walk behind him in his victory parade whispering “Look behind you! Remember that you are a man! Remember that you’ll die!” was probably a Stoic.
Burkeman visited Mexico during the Día de los Muertos festivities in order to witness a culture that retains greater intimacy with death. This is timely, of course, since Hallowe’en is just days away, and here in San Francisco we take this holiday very seriously. I’ve decided I’m going to visit the Mission District tomorrow and pick up some sugar skulls and maybe some tequila.
I can recommend this book pretty highly. But, apropos that closing chapter, I also recommend you download and listen to the Radiolab from this past January on “The Bitter End”, and make your plans accordingly: remember that you will die.
Oh, and a bit of humor: Burkeman begins his tale by studying how motivational speakers (and self-help authors) typically worship at the alter of success and optimism (and how this is ephemeral blah blah blah), and later examines how accommodating oneself to failure and eventual death can be psychologically beneficial. So I was primed and amused when this showed up within my event horizon:
A better goal is “acceptance”, and several variations on that are presented. This is a very good (albeit not perfect) book, illustrating several schools of thought that bear on the issue of happiness — or contentment, or acceptance; there are definite nuances.
An amusing and snarky appraisal of the world of self-help books and motivational speakers starts the book, but it starts delivering strongly in chapter two, What Would Seneca Do? If you look up “stoicism” in a dictionary, you really aren’t likely to get a good grip on the concept. The first definition Google hands out is “the endurance of pain or hardship without a display of feelings and without complaint”, but there is a fundamental flaw in that, which is that “display” isn’t the point. The second definition refers to the philosophy of Zeno, the Greek founder of the the school, and tells us Stoics will be “indifferent to the vicissitudes of fortune and to pleasure and pain.” That still seems a bit off, but that might have to do with five hundred years of evolution from Zeno to Marcus Aurelius.
Burkeman zeroes in on the same thing that Shakespeare put in the mouth of Hamlet: “for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” When you are stuck on a plane with a crying baby in the seat behind you, what makes it unbearable isn’t inherent in the baby’s act, but in your reception of it. A Stoic will observe and negate that aspect of that reception, which makes it much easier for that “hardship” to be “endured”. Not easy, no; but there’s a trick that helps. The subtitle of the chapter is The Stoic Art of Confronting the Worst-Case Scenario.
Ponder the difference between a terrible situation and a merely undesirable one, and the latter becomes much easier to tolerate. He extensively quotes the renowned psychologist Albert Ellis. “Even if you were murdered, ‘that is very bad, but not one-hundred percent bad,’ because several of your loved ones could meet the same fate, ‘and that would be worse. If you are tortured to death slowly, you could always be tortured to death slower.’” So that crying baby could have been accompanied by an older kid kicking the back of your seat, and parents who are discussing the wit and wisdom of, say, a political pundit whom you despise. And the flight could be from New York to Sydney, instead of merely to Los Angeles.
This trick comes into play later on, as well. The motivational gurus would have us only think positive thoughts, but the lesson here is that we could easily be better off by examining the negative — that worst-case scenario. After all, someone fixated on the best outcome imaginable will be disappointed much more often. It could be asserted that focusing on the positive helps one push harder to attain one’s goals, but the evidence for that is pretty weak. A later chapter (The Museum of Failure) reminds us of the effect, here, of the survivor’s bias: people that don’t succeed seldom are eager to talk about it, so we get the distorted of what conditions pertain to success.
I found the next chapter, on the Buddhist take on this problem, to be moderately enlightening. I’ve always been attracted to Buddhism, and in the past year or so I’ve realized why. When I think of Buddhism, I pretty much narrow it down to Stoicism-plus-Meditation. There are quite obviously many ways in which this is gonna be wrong, but I’m comfortable with it. There are aspects that completely repel me (“To the Buddha the entire teaching is just the understanding of dukkha, the unsatisfactory nature of all phenomenal existence, and the understanding of the way out of this unsatisfactoriness.” I mean, I just don’t think existence is all that bad. I suspect things were worse in India twenty-five centuries ago, though.)
I’m not sure how accurate he is, but Burkeman explains a key difference between the acceptance of the Stoic and that of the Buddhist.
The perfect Stoic adapts his or her thinking so as to remain undisturbed by undesirable circumstances; the perfect Buddhist sees thinking itself as just another set of circumstances, to be non-judgmentally observed.Got it? One is saying, “Meh, could be worse. I’m not gonna let this bother me,” and the other, “Oh, observe, young grasshopper: your mind is experiencing pain because of that arrow sticking out of your thigh. Amusing, is it not, what tricks the material world plays upon us?”
But I don’t think that all of existence is suffering, and I plan to continue to perceive bad and good as judgmentally distinct. So, given that, I’m firmly in the Stoic camp, right? Well, remember part of that definition? “Indifferent to the vicissitudes of fortune and to pleasure and pain.” I don’t really want to be indifferent for pleasure. Next time I’ve got a dentist jabbing my mouth with sharp things, I’ll try to use the
The next few chapters engage in some specious over-intellectualizing along with some very good stuff. The central idea returns, more or less, to the introductory chapter’s dismissal of striving for happiness, although the goal being strived for shifts to “security” or “success”, etc. To strive is, obviously, not the same as to attain. And for many goals, the dilemma is that the act of striving can work against the attainment. The author interviews the security expert Bruce Schneier (whose fairly recent book I gave five stars to, and I’ll plug here) in noting that the efforts of the developed world to feel safe in the last dozen years has almost certainly rendered us objectively less safe, in addition to other costs, some of them worse. A visit to the staggeringly poor slum of Kibera (part of Nairobi) helps remind us that happiness doesn’t correlate strongly with wealth, and (surprise!) those who see wealth as a primary goal are probably among the least happy of all of us.
The bad logic comes in when he tries to make the case that we are all one. Well, he denies that precise formulation, but there’s a lot like that. I mean stuff like this: “There cannot be a ‘you’ without an ‘everything else’, and attempting to think about one in isolation from the other makes no sense.” I don’t want to belabor this review with that, though. The book is very good in spite of it, so just wade through the mystical junk and everything will be fine.
When you get to the Museum of Failure, he’s back on pretty firm ground. The chapter ends with an excerpt from the famous commencement speech J.K. Rowling made at Harvard in 2008 (text, video), in which she talks up the benefits of failure. Burkeman rightly differentiates two ideas. Those that think like our sneered-at motivational speakers will argue that failure is inevitable on the way to the top, and expecting it and getting over it is healthy. Living in San Francisco, I swear almost every time I hear an entrepreneur speak they’re touting their failures like merit badges. But that still focuses on the striving, not on acceptance, and for most of us there is no pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. The other perspective is the one that Rowling also points to: absolute failure is liberating. (Yeah, duh, it is indeed a little ironic, given that it liberated Rowling to become staggeringly successful and wealthy.) You can think of it as something like “there’s no way to go but up!”, but that isn’t the point. If your goal is still “up”, then you’ve missed the point.
The book ends well with the last chapter, Memento Mori. Death is, after all, the ultimate failure. Steve Jobs is quoted, aptly: “Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked.” This returns nicely to the lessons of the Stoics; the Roman general who chose to have a slave walk behind him in his victory parade whispering “Look behind you! Remember that you are a man! Remember that you’ll die!” was probably a Stoic.
Burkeman visited Mexico during the Día de los Muertos festivities in order to witness a culture that retains greater intimacy with death. This is timely, of course, since Hallowe’en is just days away, and here in San Francisco we take this holiday very seriously. I’ve decided I’m going to visit the Mission District tomorrow and pick up some sugar skulls and maybe some tequila.
I can recommend this book pretty highly. But, apropos that closing chapter, I also recommend you download and listen to the Radiolab from this past January on “The Bitter End”, and make your plans accordingly: remember that you will die.
Oh, and a bit of humor: Burkeman begins his tale by studying how motivational speakers (and self-help authors) typically worship at the alter of success and optimism (and how this is ephemeral blah blah blah), and later examines how accommodating oneself to failure and eventual death can be psychologically beneficial. So I was primed and amused when this showed up within my event horizon:
December 22, 2012
This is a friendly little book that purports to be an anti-"self-help" book - although I have more than a sneaking suspicion that it IS a self-help book. My guess is that Oliver Burkeman is preaching to the choir, to use an old cliché, because I doubt any individual feeling the rosy after-glow of a Get Motivated! seminar will pick it up for an afternoon's reading. I bought the thing after reading a review in the Los Angeles Times, thinking it would offer a humorous take on our cultural obsession with happiness and Looking On the Bright Side.
He does. But the author also discusses some very interesting philosophies by current and ancient thinkers. I appreciated his take on Stoicism (I'm a personal fan of Epictetus), Buddhism, Freud, et cetera. And I agree with him when he writes that maybe our definition of "happiness" is screwed up.
He also comments on "the hidden benefits of insecurity" - and quotes Tennessee Williams: "Security is a kind of death, I think." This struck a chord with me.
Oliver Burkeman is no expert philosopher, but the compilation of authors he cites form a powerful argument for embracing ambiguity and uncertainty (which includes our fear of death). All the goal setting we do, all the positive visualizations, are attempts to nail down a secure surprise-free future. This is probably not news to most people. Yet, I enjoyed reading the various experts quoted in the book. I found much of the book engaging, and not negative at all.
I cannot vouch for the scholarship though - I just don't know enough - but I can tell you that the book stays on the surface of things. If you really want to know what the Greek stoics believed, you'll have to read them as directly as you can (albeit in translation). Buddhist beliefs, same. Alan Watts, same. Still, there's a lot of great ideas in this little book that can get you thinking - maybe get you to the library to check out a philosophy book.
He does. But the author also discusses some very interesting philosophies by current and ancient thinkers. I appreciated his take on Stoicism (I'm a personal fan of Epictetus), Buddhism, Freud, et cetera. And I agree with him when he writes that maybe our definition of "happiness" is screwed up.
He also comments on "the hidden benefits of insecurity" - and quotes Tennessee Williams: "Security is a kind of death, I think." This struck a chord with me.
Oliver Burkeman is no expert philosopher, but the compilation of authors he cites form a powerful argument for embracing ambiguity and uncertainty (which includes our fear of death). All the goal setting we do, all the positive visualizations, are attempts to nail down a secure surprise-free future. This is probably not news to most people. Yet, I enjoyed reading the various experts quoted in the book. I found much of the book engaging, and not negative at all.
I cannot vouch for the scholarship though - I just don't know enough - but I can tell you that the book stays on the surface of things. If you really want to know what the Greek stoics believed, you'll have to read them as directly as you can (albeit in translation). Buddhist beliefs, same. Alan Watts, same. Still, there's a lot of great ideas in this little book that can get you thinking - maybe get you to the library to check out a philosophy book.
Read
February 17, 2021A pretty good look at Stoic and similar philosophies, talking about what really makes us happy, and better mental approaches. Amusingly written and an easy read.
May 25, 2013
Excellent book. The writing is highly engaging, and Burkeman gives enough information to be interesting, without overloading the reader, and incorporates just the right amount of personal narrative. The book is easy to just fall into, and, while still thought-provoking, doesn't require the reader to sit for ten minutes rotating a concept until its in the right position for comprehension.
I think it's got the wrong title, because this makes it sound like pop-psychology, and this is much more than that. I guess a book called "A summary of some of the main humanist philosophical approaches to the human condition, that might suggest to the reader some alternative frameworks for a 'meaningful' life" would not be a best-seller.
P.S. Lulz at that blurb; "a radically new path to happiness." Seneca died in 65 CE. Stoicism is literally thousands of years old. I guess they really are going for that endlessly-reinventing self-help market.
I think it's got the wrong title, because this makes it sound like pop-psychology, and this is much more than that. I guess a book called "A summary of some of the main humanist philosophical approaches to the human condition, that might suggest to the reader some alternative frameworks for a 'meaningful' life" would not be a best-seller.
P.S. Lulz at that blurb; "a radically new path to happiness." Seneca died in 65 CE. Stoicism is literally thousands of years old. I guess they really are going for that endlessly-reinventing self-help market.
October 18, 2018
This is a great overview of some great studies on “happiness” or rather peace. So it’s a great start for people who don’t read a lot of self help books, but for those who have a hobby of reading meditation books (guilty), a lot of this is not new material. It’s a review of Eckhart Tolle and Buddhism and stoicism and a rebuke of the positive thinking industry, though not the first. The industry has been bankrupt of ideas for a while and others have called it out. Still, this is a good book and it’s often funny and definitely helpful.
March 31, 2019
Of course this is not perfect. Of course there is a populist tone and a lack of rigour. Of course there are some parts that fall apart if you pick at them too much. But there is a hell of a lot of good stuff here, all of which has tied in nicely with the work I have been doing on my anxiety and depression issues over the last few years. All I can say is that from practical experience, this approach can help. And he is right, too, to speak of having a “tool kit”, rather than buying totally in to any one approach. There are some great tools here. Thoroughly recommended reading.
June 29, 2019
“Priešnuodis” - tai knyga, kuri savo viršeliu ir užrašais ant jo greičiausiai jūsų dėmesio nepatrauks. Bent jau mano tikrai ne! Bet... kas slepiasi jos viduje yra tikras lobis.
Nežinau, kaip jūs, bet aš turiu grynų gryniausią alergiją visiems “ jei gyvenimas tau duoda citriną - pasidaryk limonado” nesąmonėms. Kai tau sunku ir iškyla dar daugiau nenumatytų sunkumų, mažiausiai ką nori daryti yra limonadas. Visomis prasmėmis. Ši knyga nėra eilinė “self help” knygiūkštė. Joje Oliver Burkeman labai patraukliu ir pagauliu stiliumi sumala į miltus 21 amžiaus taip numylėtą ir išliaupsintą pozityvųjį mąstymą. Skamba gana primityviai? Tikitės, kad autorius pasiūlys tapti viskuo pasibodėjusiais niurzgomis? Oi ne! Knygoje susipina filosofija, psichologija, rimti moksliniai tyrimai, budizmo filosofija ir net pasirodo garsusis “Naujosios Žemės”autorius Tolle. Kaip jau galite numanyti - ši kombinacija tikrai galinga.
Atskleisti turinio nenoriu- taip atimčiau didžiąją dalį malonumo. Knyga patiks tiems, kurie laiko save realistais, nori šiek tiek įkvėpimo, bet ne to lėkšto ir pabodusio “ei, tu gali”, “viskas tavo rankose”, motyvacija, motyvuoti, motyv...blabla ir pan. Man asmeniškai, ši knyga buvo tarsi konspektas viso to, kuo aš tikiu ir vadovaujuosi savo gyvenime. Sužinokite, kokie yra mąstymo tik optimistiškai šalutiniai efektai, kodėl negerai aklai nusibrėžti ir siekti savo tikslų ir kaip ieškoti ramybės ir laimės savo gyvenime, jei medijų brunkamas populiarus pozityvusis mąstymas jums kelia ne motyvaciją o susierzinimą. Gero skaitymo.
Nežinau, kaip jūs, bet aš turiu grynų gryniausią alergiją visiems “ jei gyvenimas tau duoda citriną - pasidaryk limonado” nesąmonėms. Kai tau sunku ir iškyla dar daugiau nenumatytų sunkumų, mažiausiai ką nori daryti yra limonadas. Visomis prasmėmis. Ši knyga nėra eilinė “self help” knygiūkštė. Joje Oliver Burkeman labai patraukliu ir pagauliu stiliumi sumala į miltus 21 amžiaus taip numylėtą ir išliaupsintą pozityvųjį mąstymą. Skamba gana primityviai? Tikitės, kad autorius pasiūlys tapti viskuo pasibodėjusiais niurzgomis? Oi ne! Knygoje susipina filosofija, psichologija, rimti moksliniai tyrimai, budizmo filosofija ir net pasirodo garsusis “Naujosios Žemės”autorius Tolle. Kaip jau galite numanyti - ši kombinacija tikrai galinga.
Atskleisti turinio nenoriu- taip atimčiau didžiąją dalį malonumo. Knyga patiks tiems, kurie laiko save realistais, nori šiek tiek įkvėpimo, bet ne to lėkšto ir pabodusio “ei, tu gali”, “viskas tavo rankose”, motyvacija, motyvuoti, motyv...blabla ir pan. Man asmeniškai, ši knyga buvo tarsi konspektas viso to, kuo aš tikiu ir vadovaujuosi savo gyvenime. Sužinokite, kokie yra mąstymo tik optimistiškai šalutiniai efektai, kodėl negerai aklai nusibrėžti ir siekti savo tikslų ir kaip ieškoti ramybės ir laimės savo gyvenime, jei medijų brunkamas populiarus pozityvusis mąstymas jums kelia ne motyvaciją o susierzinimą. Gero skaitymo.
May 27, 2020
Outstanding...
Learning to focus on the negative may cause some to raise an eyebrow. Accepting your failures and even having a sort of relationship with death can be downright scary for others. But Burkeman takes your hand and lightly leads you through the ideals of Stoicism using many examples along the way and many different principles from around the world. In this book you will discover how positive thinking can actually be damaging for some people.
This is got to be one of my most favorite self-help books of all time! And looking at other reviews I understand that a lot of the information contained in this book may be rehashed from previous sources. However for a lot of these ideas and techniques, this is my first time reading about them, and I consider them to be shiny and new! 🤩
I'm not going to lie a lot of the techniques are a little shocking. I mean who wants to focus on the worst case scenario of your situation right? But as the book explains, by doing such exercises are we allowing ourselves to come to grips with just how are rational our fears really are. This and more is what you will learn about in this book.
The author tends to ramble a little bit towards the end chapters but still gives very good points and references.
I think that this is a wonderful introductory book to Stoicism and I would very much like to research more on the subject because of this book.
If the positive thinking mantra is not your thing, I would most definitely recommend reading this book for a different outlook and indeed a different path to happiness.
Learning to focus on the negative may cause some to raise an eyebrow. Accepting your failures and even having a sort of relationship with death can be downright scary for others. But Burkeman takes your hand and lightly leads you through the ideals of Stoicism using many examples along the way and many different principles from around the world. In this book you will discover how positive thinking can actually be damaging for some people.
This is got to be one of my most favorite self-help books of all time! And looking at other reviews I understand that a lot of the information contained in this book may be rehashed from previous sources. However for a lot of these ideas and techniques, this is my first time reading about them, and I consider them to be shiny and new! 🤩
I'm not going to lie a lot of the techniques are a little shocking. I mean who wants to focus on the worst case scenario of your situation right? But as the book explains, by doing such exercises are we allowing ourselves to come to grips with just how are rational our fears really are. This and more is what you will learn about in this book.
The author tends to ramble a little bit towards the end chapters but still gives very good points and references.
I think that this is a wonderful introductory book to Stoicism and I would very much like to research more on the subject because of this book.
If the positive thinking mantra is not your thing, I would most definitely recommend reading this book for a different outlook and indeed a different path to happiness.
March 3, 2015
(Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter.com]. I am the original author of this essay, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted illegally.)
I know this is going to come as a shock to many of you, but I am not exactly an "Up With People" kind of guy, and the relentless forced positivity within a certain section of the liberal arts these days, despite being done for the most noble intentions, tends to wear me out. So thank God, then, for the newish The Antidote: Happiness for People Who Can't Stand Positive Thinking by philosopher and participatory journalist Oliver Burkeman; he instead looks at the many groups over the last several millennia, from the Stoics of ancient Greece to the Buddhists of Asia, the Rationalists of the Enlightenment, and even such modern figures as Alan Watts, to show that maybe it's actually pretty healthy to sometimes picture the worst-case scenario, to embrace the failures you make, and to always carry with you a finely tuned daily awareness of your own imminent death. As these groups have each independently proven, he shows through a series of fascinating trips to various contemporary communities, tribes and experts around the globe, it can actually be really healthy for humans to understand their boundaries, to know which things they can reasonably accomplish and which they can't, and to know when to let go of an obsessive desire for a goal before that goal instead kills you; and in the meanwhile, he cites modern study after modern study that are each starting to show how much damage the "power of positive thinking" can have, from increased frustration over challenges to the body giving up on a challenge after enjoying it too much in an idealized version in one's head, even to the kinds of fatalistic embrace of violent quick-change solutions that always come with fascist administrations in times of crisis. (It's not a coincidence that Nazi-era Germans and Bush-era Americans were both obsessed with new-age beliefs.) A fresh splash of water in a lobotomizingly peppy world of endless Tony Robbinses and Deepak Chopras, this will absolutely change the way you look at the world if you're one of those people receptive to its message, and it comes strongly recommended whether to read or to simply carry to your next corporate-job-mandated "Unleash The Power of Positivity!" seminar at your local sports arena.
Out of 10: 9.7
I know this is going to come as a shock to many of you, but I am not exactly an "Up With People" kind of guy, and the relentless forced positivity within a certain section of the liberal arts these days, despite being done for the most noble intentions, tends to wear me out. So thank God, then, for the newish The Antidote: Happiness for People Who Can't Stand Positive Thinking by philosopher and participatory journalist Oliver Burkeman; he instead looks at the many groups over the last several millennia, from the Stoics of ancient Greece to the Buddhists of Asia, the Rationalists of the Enlightenment, and even such modern figures as Alan Watts, to show that maybe it's actually pretty healthy to sometimes picture the worst-case scenario, to embrace the failures you make, and to always carry with you a finely tuned daily awareness of your own imminent death. As these groups have each independently proven, he shows through a series of fascinating trips to various contemporary communities, tribes and experts around the globe, it can actually be really healthy for humans to understand their boundaries, to know which things they can reasonably accomplish and which they can't, and to know when to let go of an obsessive desire for a goal before that goal instead kills you; and in the meanwhile, he cites modern study after modern study that are each starting to show how much damage the "power of positive thinking" can have, from increased frustration over challenges to the body giving up on a challenge after enjoying it too much in an idealized version in one's head, even to the kinds of fatalistic embrace of violent quick-change solutions that always come with fascist administrations in times of crisis. (It's not a coincidence that Nazi-era Germans and Bush-era Americans were both obsessed with new-age beliefs.) A fresh splash of water in a lobotomizingly peppy world of endless Tony Robbinses and Deepak Chopras, this will absolutely change the way you look at the world if you're one of those people receptive to its message, and it comes strongly recommended whether to read or to simply carry to your next corporate-job-mandated "Unleash The Power of Positivity!" seminar at your local sports arena.
Out of 10: 9.7
Read
April 3, 2019I suppose some folks read books like this to learn something. And if so they could do worse than this one. For me, not so much to learn anew as to be reminded of what I knew already. In this case it was something I was first reminded of by Zizek and have benefited from rehearing here. That is, if you want something the best way to not get at it is to aim directly at it.
And it was refreshing, true, to read something that involved some thinking but didn't require any heavy lifting.
And it was refreshing, true, to read something that involved some thinking but didn't require any heavy lifting.
March 2, 2013
The Antidote starts off by talking about the positive thinking movement, moves on to Seneca and the Stoics then dips into Buddhist meditation, pauses to to criticize goal setting then stops in for a visit with Eckhart Tolle. Burkeman then writes about how we overvalue safety and undervalue failure then ends with a chapter on how we approach death, including an interesting visit to Mexico on the Day of the Dead.
Every chapter is well written and provides sufficient insight into each of the various subjects the book touches on. In the end, it's all pulled together nicely and makes a good case for finding peace and happiness by focusing on being okay with life as it is rather than constantly worrying about what it could be or should be. It's a good introduction to alternatives to positive thinking, but The Antidote never goes deep enough into any one subject to make it a memorable book or one that is worth re-reading.
Also...the cover endorsement "elegant and erudite" by Jonah Lehrer is unfortunate.
Every chapter is well written and provides sufficient insight into each of the various subjects the book touches on. In the end, it's all pulled together nicely and makes a good case for finding peace and happiness by focusing on being okay with life as it is rather than constantly worrying about what it could be or should be. It's a good introduction to alternatives to positive thinking, but The Antidote never goes deep enough into any one subject to make it a memorable book or one that is worth re-reading.
Also...the cover endorsement "elegant and erudite" by Jonah Lehrer is unfortunate.
February 5, 2015
Looking at life directly is a lot like looking at the sun directly and should come with similar warnings. Damage will be done. Which is not to say that you shouldn't do it, or that anything could prevent some of us from doing it frequently and with great determination. But it would have been nice to have had some sort of cautionary word, some small piece of been-there-done-that warrior's wisdom; something graspable beyond the rather underwhelming bromide: Ignorance is bliss. Because by the time I realized ignorance was most assuredly the way to go? It was far, far too late for me. So any whisper of an antidote at this stage of the game is going to find me raising a swift hand to call that bartender forth. Two fingers, sirrah, and make it neat.
Burkeman calls it happiness, but one could just as easily allude to this as a quest for the means of contentment, a sturdy satisfaction, a brief bit of regularly-experienced peace with the world and living in it. His British mind is possessed of the same existential unease that afflicts a good portion of thinking people, and he's willing to sample our culture's many remedies to locate his relief. From motivational seminars to monasteries, experimental psychologists to business consultants, he does the legwork few find the time or inclination to do, and brings to it a wonderfully complex combination of intelligence, wit and curiosity.
A good sense of the tone can be gained from his foray into motivational speaking and the prevalence of forced optimism - this insistence on ridding ourselves of every negative thought. Here, he suggests, is a version of Dostoevsky's infamous parlor game: Do not think of a white bear for the next few minutes. The image of the white bear soon becomes a torment. By demanding we repel every sour idea and insert a sweet one in its place, we are left in a constant state of vigilance and flight; marshaling our energies not toward beneficial outcomes but toward guarding against our natural inclination to adequately assess risk. We stop asking ourselves: What's the worst that could happen? That's a fundamentally sound method of formulating judgment which we end up running away from to our cognitive detriment.
Stoicism and Buddhism get a fair amount of attention (and engagingly so), as do the fears surrounding sickness, ageing and death (which lie at the root of what most of us are trying so futilely to escape). The anecdotes are relevant, the transitions seamless, the concepts evolving slowly enough to provide the anchorage needed during a confrontation with the sort of ideas most people I know try desperately to avoid.
I was pleased to have found this. Thoughts were provoked.
Burkeman calls it happiness, but one could just as easily allude to this as a quest for the means of contentment, a sturdy satisfaction, a brief bit of regularly-experienced peace with the world and living in it. His British mind is possessed of the same existential unease that afflicts a good portion of thinking people, and he's willing to sample our culture's many remedies to locate his relief. From motivational seminars to monasteries, experimental psychologists to business consultants, he does the legwork few find the time or inclination to do, and brings to it a wonderfully complex combination of intelligence, wit and curiosity.
A good sense of the tone can be gained from his foray into motivational speaking and the prevalence of forced optimism - this insistence on ridding ourselves of every negative thought. Here, he suggests, is a version of Dostoevsky's infamous parlor game: Do not think of a white bear for the next few minutes. The image of the white bear soon becomes a torment. By demanding we repel every sour idea and insert a sweet one in its place, we are left in a constant state of vigilance and flight; marshaling our energies not toward beneficial outcomes but toward guarding against our natural inclination to adequately assess risk. We stop asking ourselves: What's the worst that could happen? That's a fundamentally sound method of formulating judgment which we end up running away from to our cognitive detriment.
Stoicism and Buddhism get a fair amount of attention (and engagingly so), as do the fears surrounding sickness, ageing and death (which lie at the root of what most of us are trying so futilely to escape). The anecdotes are relevant, the transitions seamless, the concepts evolving slowly enough to provide the anchorage needed during a confrontation with the sort of ideas most people I know try desperately to avoid.
I was pleased to have found this. Thoughts were provoked.
December 8, 2021
This starts off well with some humorous comments on positive thinking. I thought this might be a funnier version of :Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America
.
But then the author goes off track getting less funny and reaching too far trying to sum up all of Western and Eastern philosophy in a few chapters of disconnected anecdotes and interviews with people like Eckhart Tolle. And despite this huge goal, there are unnecessary and confusing detours, like a long discussion of Descartes's "cogito ergo sum" that I think misses the point. Descartes's extreme doubt was dangerously radical in the context of absolute monarchy by divine right. It is the attitudinal foundation of the scientific revolution. Descartes' Bones: A Skeletal History of the Conflict Between Faith and Reason
As such, it fits in perfectly with the general point the author is making about realism vs. wishful thinking. Instead he splits hairs trying to undermine it for some reason.
For a critique of the self-help industry, just read Barbara Ehrenreich's book. For someone interested in benefiting from the techniques he mentions instead of philosophizing about them, I think it would be better to read Kabat-Zinn, Lao-Tse, etc. directly. Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life Tao Te Ching by Stephen Mitchell Summary Study Guide
.But then the author goes off track getting less funny and reaching too far trying to sum up all of Western and Eastern philosophy in a few chapters of disconnected anecdotes and interviews with people like Eckhart Tolle. And despite this huge goal, there are unnecessary and confusing detours, like a long discussion of Descartes's "cogito ergo sum" that I think misses the point. Descartes's extreme doubt was dangerously radical in the context of absolute monarchy by divine right. It is the attitudinal foundation of the scientific revolution. Descartes' Bones: A Skeletal History of the Conflict Between Faith and Reason
As such, it fits in perfectly with the general point the author is making about realism vs. wishful thinking. Instead he splits hairs trying to undermine it for some reason. For a critique of the self-help industry, just read Barbara Ehrenreich's book. For someone interested in benefiting from the techniques he mentions instead of philosophizing about them, I think it would be better to read Kabat-Zinn, Lao-Tse, etc. directly. Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation in Everyday Life Tao Te Ching by Stephen Mitchell Summary Study Guide
December 2, 2025
Oliver Burkeman's latest book "4000 Weeks" is one of my favorites of the last few years, so I was eager to see if "The Antidote" would offer the same level of insight. Both books approach productivity and happiness from a refreshingly counterintuitive perspective: you’re never going to get it all done, so stop trying so hard. You’re just making yourself miserable.
In "The Antidote," Burkeman argues against the typical self-help mantra of positive thinking and goal-setting. Instead, he promotes the idea that embracing uncertainty, failure, and even negativity can lead to a more fulfilling and less stressful life. This contrarian approach is one of the book's strongest points.
Burkeman’s writing is incredibly approachable, and his ability to craft a sentence that cuts to the core of deep wisdom is nothing short of impressive. He also has a delightful sense of humor that makes this cumbersome topic so much more enjoyable. His thorough research is evident throughout the book, as he seamlessly integrates ideas from popular culture, ancient philosophy, and cutting-edge research.
One of the most compelling sections of the book is where Burkeman delves into the concept of "goalodicy" - the misguided belief that achieving specific goals will lead to lasting happiness. He effectively debunks this notion by showing how the relentless pursuit of goals often leads to anxiety and dissatisfaction.
Another highlight is his exploration of the "negative path" to happiness, which involves acknowledging and accepting life’s difficulties instead of trying to avoid them. Think of all the mental energy we expend hoping and often times denying that bad things will happen. Burkeman encourages us to dive in and fully contemplate the most terrible things, then to ask, “could I continue to live and be happy if that happened?” Most of the time, the answer is yes.
So you visit the eye doctor and receive troubling news that you might have the first signs of glaucoma. Most of us would then spend the next few years continually fretting that we might go blind. Every time the thought shows up, we try to push it to the back of our mind. We reassure ourselves that it probably won’t happen, but still, it haunts us.
Burkeman encourages us to go hard and long on contemplating blindness. Would it be tough to go blind? You bet, but would your life be over? Would you be incapable of continuing to live? For most of us, the answer is no. It might be difficult, but we could go on. Blind people find happiness and fulfilling lives all the time...and we could do that too.
This book is a thought-provoking read that challenges conventional glass-half-full notion in a fun and interesting way. It’s particularly valuable for those of us looking to break free from the tyranny of relentless self-improvement and the exhaustion of positivity-at-all-times thinking.
In "The Antidote," Burkeman argues against the typical self-help mantra of positive thinking and goal-setting. Instead, he promotes the idea that embracing uncertainty, failure, and even negativity can lead to a more fulfilling and less stressful life. This contrarian approach is one of the book's strongest points.
Burkeman’s writing is incredibly approachable, and his ability to craft a sentence that cuts to the core of deep wisdom is nothing short of impressive. He also has a delightful sense of humor that makes this cumbersome topic so much more enjoyable. His thorough research is evident throughout the book, as he seamlessly integrates ideas from popular culture, ancient philosophy, and cutting-edge research.
One of the most compelling sections of the book is where Burkeman delves into the concept of "goalodicy" - the misguided belief that achieving specific goals will lead to lasting happiness. He effectively debunks this notion by showing how the relentless pursuit of goals often leads to anxiety and dissatisfaction.
Another highlight is his exploration of the "negative path" to happiness, which involves acknowledging and accepting life’s difficulties instead of trying to avoid them. Think of all the mental energy we expend hoping and often times denying that bad things will happen. Burkeman encourages us to dive in and fully contemplate the most terrible things, then to ask, “could I continue to live and be happy if that happened?” Most of the time, the answer is yes.
So you visit the eye doctor and receive troubling news that you might have the first signs of glaucoma. Most of us would then spend the next few years continually fretting that we might go blind. Every time the thought shows up, we try to push it to the back of our mind. We reassure ourselves that it probably won’t happen, but still, it haunts us.
Burkeman encourages us to go hard and long on contemplating blindness. Would it be tough to go blind? You bet, but would your life be over? Would you be incapable of continuing to live? For most of us, the answer is no. It might be difficult, but we could go on. Blind people find happiness and fulfilling lives all the time...and we could do that too.
This book is a thought-provoking read that challenges conventional glass-half-full notion in a fun and interesting way. It’s particularly valuable for those of us looking to break free from the tyranny of relentless self-improvement and the exhaustion of positivity-at-all-times thinking.
Want to read
January 8, 2021I feel this book might've been written ESPECIALLY for me...
April 24, 2016
I wanted to scream, "Shut Up!," through the entire book. I have no idea why I listened to the whole book. It was terrible. I loved the title and the idea of calling out positive thinking. But, all this author did was replace one untested and ineffective method (positive thinking) with another (his brand of thinking).
The book did include some talk of bias (his best writing was on survivor bias... if you make it that far in the book). But there are many excellent books that focus on bias. No need to waste time seeking out the substandard explanations of these biases in this book. I kept thinking he was going to pull the book out of the hole he dug. The author criticized the lack of critical thinking ability in various authors but never seemed to be able to identify his own.
He hates The Secret and Laws of Attraction but is wholly enamored with stoicism and writes about it in a way that, for me, was akin to religious ideology. I kept thinking, "Maybe I am misunderstanding what he is trying to say. He cannot possibly insult one thing and then adopt the opposite thing built on the *same* type of thinking."
He included tiny concepts that are certainly related to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which has been shown to be the most effective therapy to date. But nothing ever developed fully
The second to last chapter was on being zen about death. I found myself wishing this book would die. I have no idea who the target audience for this book is. I thought it was certainly someone like me. After wasting my valuable reading time on this book, I am certain it's not for someone like me. I want those hours of my life back.
The book did include some talk of bias (his best writing was on survivor bias... if you make it that far in the book). But there are many excellent books that focus on bias. No need to waste time seeking out the substandard explanations of these biases in this book. I kept thinking he was going to pull the book out of the hole he dug. The author criticized the lack of critical thinking ability in various authors but never seemed to be able to identify his own.
He hates The Secret and Laws of Attraction but is wholly enamored with stoicism and writes about it in a way that, for me, was akin to religious ideology. I kept thinking, "Maybe I am misunderstanding what he is trying to say. He cannot possibly insult one thing and then adopt the opposite thing built on the *same* type of thinking."
He included tiny concepts that are certainly related to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which has been shown to be the most effective therapy to date. But nothing ever developed fully
The second to last chapter was on being zen about death. I found myself wishing this book would die. I have no idea who the target audience for this book is. I thought it was certainly someone like me. After wasting my valuable reading time on this book, I am certain it's not for someone like me. I want those hours of my life back.
May 14, 2013
OK - So I will admit I picked this up because of my cynicism. I'm just not one of those "happy" people that are all the rage right now.
I kept reading because this book is so much more. How wonderfully validating this book was. (That is why we read self-help books, right? Not to change, but to validate who we are.) At some point I had realized that while I'm not one of the "happy' type, I am a content person when I'm not feeling bad about myself for not being "happy." The constant pressure to be happy, the pressure to reach lofty goals, and positive thinking no matter what may not be getting us where we need to be. We have much to learn from the logic of the Stoics and the mindfulness of the Buddhists. Or, if you are the "happy" type and it's working for you, go for it. Just please be respectful of my way of thinking.
The point here is not that negative capability is always superior to the positive kind. Optimism is wonderful; goals can sometimes b useful' even positive thinking and positive visualization have their benefits. The problem is that we have developed the habit of chronically overvaluing positivity and the skills of 'doing' in how we think about happiness and that we chronically undervalue negativity and the 'not-doing' skills, such as resting in uncertainty or getting friendly towards failure.
Do not worry about us negative people. We just get there in a different way.
I kept reading because this book is so much more. How wonderfully validating this book was. (That is why we read self-help books, right? Not to change, but to validate who we are.) At some point I had realized that while I'm not one of the "happy' type, I am a content person when I'm not feeling bad about myself for not being "happy." The constant pressure to be happy, the pressure to reach lofty goals, and positive thinking no matter what may not be getting us where we need to be. We have much to learn from the logic of the Stoics and the mindfulness of the Buddhists. Or, if you are the "happy" type and it's working for you, go for it. Just please be respectful of my way of thinking.
The point here is not that negative capability is always superior to the positive kind. Optimism is wonderful; goals can sometimes b useful' even positive thinking and positive visualization have their benefits. The problem is that we have developed the habit of chronically overvaluing positivity and the skills of 'doing' in how we think about happiness and that we chronically undervalue negativity and the 'not-doing' skills, such as resting in uncertainty or getting friendly towards failure.
Do not worry about us negative people. We just get there in a different way.
August 28, 2015
Really good stuff. I picked up this book after receiving a request for it at work and was intrigued based on my skeptical reactions to the cropping-up of more and more positive-thinking seekers in my life. Its just not my thing. Granted, I think a lot of people get a lot out of "positive thinking" but I have problems with a mode of being/thinking that denies/tries to cover up the yin of the yin and yang. This book delves into the psychology of this thinking and why the opposite approach - accepting negativity and learning to be content with it - is the stronger study. I love history and philosophy and cultural studies so I appreciated that, in much of the book, Burkeman discusses varying philosophical and religious movements such as Stoicism, Buddhism, meditation, the study of "death-worshipping" culture, and my personal favorite motto/reminder: "memento mori" and the important lessons we could learn from each. (He also speaks on the common misconceptions of how some of these movements are attributed to what Burkeman calls "the cult of optimism" when they are, in fact, not about positivity, but accepting negativity in your life.) For anyone sick of people's positive affirmations just not cutting it when you're going through bad shit, this is the book for you. And if not, at least you'll end the book understanding this key point - YES, life sucks sometimes... but it could always be worse. And then you die. :)
March 30, 2021
At its core, an intermittently rambling, superficial drive-by observation of Stoicism and how its principles could be helpful in modern life. Not a complete waste of time, but also not anything groundbreaking.
I very much agree with Burkeman that many of the tropes of positive thinking are at best useless and at worst counter-productive, but this book misses its chance to clearly lay out the alternatives.
I very much agree with Burkeman that many of the tropes of positive thinking are at best useless and at worst counter-productive, but this book misses its chance to clearly lay out the alternatives.
July 5, 2013
Calling this book life changing would be a little hyperbolic, calling it perspective changing would not.
Oliver Burkeman, a Brit, starts by looking at what's wrong with America's billion dollar self-help/motivational industry. There's the expensive seminars (which corporations, the military and government agencies pay for their employees to attend) where an 80-year-old tycoon with an orange faux tan lets you in on his secret to success: banish the word "impossible" from your vocabulary! Then there's "The Secret" itself: an Oprah-fueled industry of books, web sites and seminars that tell people they can have whatever they want if they just believe! Come from the ghetto or the trailer park? You too can end up like Oprah if you just believe it hard enough! And there's the recent research that seems to show the more people use these kinds of self-help techniques, the more unhappy they seem to become.
Burkeman, a bit of a curmudgeon by nature, sees through the snake oil peddlers all too easily, but longs for some alternative that might bring a sense of fulfillment or contentment to his life, so he sets out to explore how cultures throughout history have defined and pursued happiness. He finds some fascinating things, which the book lays out in subsequent chapters.
I found that I was in familiar territory in a number of the chapters, having studied Buddhist philosophy and meditation techniques as well as cognitive behavioral therapy. Perhaps not just coincidentally, there is overlap between those techniques and philosophies like Stoicism, which Burkeman covers (Buddhist style meditation gets its own chapter). I had to hold my skepticism in check for the chapter on the self that included a big dose of Eckhart Tolle, since until now I had thought of Tolle as squarely in Oprah/Secret territory. A lot of Tolle's philosophy overlaps with the Buddhist concept of the self as illusory. Try to define your "self" and put boundaries around it and it becomes very elusive. Is the self your body? Is it your thoughts? If this thing is elusive or illusory, why do we spend so much time obsessing about its esteem and why does it need help? Other chapters deal with embracing insecurity, failure and other "negative" emotions (rather than repressing them, which research suggests is what "positive thinking" causes many people to do)as part of a full and rich human experience of life. The ultimate message behind at least one chapter is that if you are feeling insecure, depressed, fearful or unmotivated just STFU and keep driving, a very complex philosophy that has intuitively gotten me through some of the worst days of my life.
I work in a library and have so much free information at my fingertips on a daily basis that I rarely buy books, but I will probably pick up a copy of this one. It's the kind of book I see myself coming back to as the years go on.
Oliver Burkeman, a Brit, starts by looking at what's wrong with America's billion dollar self-help/motivational industry. There's the expensive seminars (which corporations, the military and government agencies pay for their employees to attend) where an 80-year-old tycoon with an orange faux tan lets you in on his secret to success: banish the word "impossible" from your vocabulary! Then there's "The Secret" itself: an Oprah-fueled industry of books, web sites and seminars that tell people they can have whatever they want if they just believe! Come from the ghetto or the trailer park? You too can end up like Oprah if you just believe it hard enough! And there's the recent research that seems to show the more people use these kinds of self-help techniques, the more unhappy they seem to become.
Burkeman, a bit of a curmudgeon by nature, sees through the snake oil peddlers all too easily, but longs for some alternative that might bring a sense of fulfillment or contentment to his life, so he sets out to explore how cultures throughout history have defined and pursued happiness. He finds some fascinating things, which the book lays out in subsequent chapters.
I found that I was in familiar territory in a number of the chapters, having studied Buddhist philosophy and meditation techniques as well as cognitive behavioral therapy. Perhaps not just coincidentally, there is overlap between those techniques and philosophies like Stoicism, which Burkeman covers (Buddhist style meditation gets its own chapter). I had to hold my skepticism in check for the chapter on the self that included a big dose of Eckhart Tolle, since until now I had thought of Tolle as squarely in Oprah/Secret territory. A lot of Tolle's philosophy overlaps with the Buddhist concept of the self as illusory. Try to define your "self" and put boundaries around it and it becomes very elusive. Is the self your body? Is it your thoughts? If this thing is elusive or illusory, why do we spend so much time obsessing about its esteem and why does it need help? Other chapters deal with embracing insecurity, failure and other "negative" emotions (rather than repressing them, which research suggests is what "positive thinking" causes many people to do)as part of a full and rich human experience of life. The ultimate message behind at least one chapter is that if you are feeling insecure, depressed, fearful or unmotivated just STFU and keep driving, a very complex philosophy that has intuitively gotten me through some of the worst days of my life.
I work in a library and have so much free information at my fingertips on a daily basis that I rarely buy books, but I will probably pick up a copy of this one. It's the kind of book I see myself coming back to as the years go on.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,656 reviews