I feel somewhat bad about my following review, but I'm just intending to be honest. I will say that I appreciated his question and answer portion at the end of the book. It felt more succinct, even if I didn't agree with all of it. He also explains further in this portion that he intends to provoke disagreement, which is fair... I just strongly disagree with a lot of what he says. I intend this all with humility and respect, knowing that it won't all come across with such. Here goes...
For most of this book, I've wondered why I'm still reading it. I'm feeling a sense of needing to finish, but also feeling quite frustrated with the content. He's speaking so much about non-duality and living beyond ego, but the text feels so egoic to me. His writing feels akin to Osho in some respects (with whom I also agree and disagree). I agree wholeheartedly with concepts of fully being with what is, and not placing judgments on anything... yet the next sentence is full of judgment and dualism regarding people's beliefs or spirituality. He suggests that chakras mean nothing and are simply ego projections and then goes on to speak about what he terms as energy knots, as if his framework is correct while others are dualistic. He then shares how he works on someone energetically by placing his hands on them or lying on top of them.
There are just so many points in this book where I felt like he seems unaware of his own projections and judgments. So much writing about what he sees as the way to do things, such as symmetrical movements being good while asymmetry is just ego.
The main frustration for me, is how he writes about all kinds of beliefs, practices, or even body movements being projections of the ego, as if he can dismiss anything because we're all one. I've had the non-dual experience with 5-MeO, and it made me more open to all ways of being and believing in this world, not more restrictive and dismissive as he appears to be. Just because we are all one, in no way negates ideas of spirits or chakras or the like for me. We live in a dualistic material realm within the greater context of being non-dual. To me it's both and. I think he's taken the idea of non-dual and run with it so hard that he's become blind to how he condemns others for being too dual (isn't that dualism in itself?) while believing that somehow his particular beliefs around how to work with 5-MeO are somehow non-dual.
Many of the practices or ways or working that he suggests seem unnecessary to me. The idea that he might need to vocalize during someone else's session? Sure, if that's what floats your boat... but I've never had that as a part of my experience, and I'm grateful to have practiced where anyone "holding the space" does not project sounds into my experience. Or for that matter, a practitioner who thinks vomiting on me might be what needs to happen. I get that it's all one, but I've had profound transformative experiences without any facilitator thinking they need to do anything to me (lay his hands on me or make sounds or take the molecule at the same time). His technique is not for me, but it's not what I am critiquing (to each their own). Rather, it's his condemnation of so many practices as egoic, and then going on to have specific practices that he thinks are the way to do things. He compares not having him do work on you to going to the massage therapist and not wanting them to touch you. What?! Massage requires hands on, whereas the 5-MeO experience does not require your hands on me. 5-MeO does plenty on its own, it's changed my view of reality and who I am beyond any hundreds of ayahuasca sessions on its own. 5-MeO *is* the massage therapist, not you. And then he goes on to state this hierarchy of provider vs. practitioner, where he decides that you are just a medicine provider if you don't work on the person energetically, but are a practitioner (a status which he makes clear he doubts you could attain) if you do work on the person (and of course he dismisses shamanic work, but somehow his energetic work is of value).
Argh. I could go on and on really (clearly). I've read a few books about 5-MeO now, and it so often feels like the texts are by someone purporting to be beyond ego, yet their text reads so densely with egoic tone. The cherry on top is how he writes as if he's achieved some liberated state, yet that the average person would not be able to attain what he has. That's my favourite (she says sarcastically), when someone acts as if liberation or enlightenment is next to impossible. As if they've attained some magical state that you likely will not attain. Isn't enlightenment letting go of? Lightening? Realizing that there is nothing to attain?
All this said (clearly I needed to vent), he has many valuable insights to offer, I just wouldn't recommend this book. And yet, for some desire of completion, I'll still finish it. I doubt I'll be picking up another book by him. I wish people would write about their experiences with humility. Honour the cultures and belief systems around you instead of condescendingly dismissing them all. Share your experience without feeling the need to talk as if you know the holy truth of non-dual being.