What do you think?
Rate this book
Foes From the Northern Frontier: Invading Hordes from the Russian Steppes
Are there any biblical references to territories in what is today the country of Russia? The author's answer is yes, but Ezekiel's reference to Rosh and Meshech is not one of them. In a thoroughly documented discussion, the author describes the Uratrians, Manneans, Cimmerians, and Scythians. Three of these northern foes of Israel are referred to by Jeremiah (in 51:27), the Cimmerians by Ezekiel (38:6). . . . with the exception of Egypt, writes the author, almost all of Israel's enemies came from the north, though from the viewpoint of a modern map, many of these came ultimately from the east. The Urartians occupied what is now Soviet Armenia, southeastern Turkey, and northwestern Iran. The Manneans lived south of Lake Urmia, between Urartu and Assyria. The Cimmerians first appeared in the steppes north of the Caucasus, then crossed the Caucasus, and eventually invaded Asia Minor. The Scythians were nomadic tribes from the Russian steppes, some of whom settled in the Ukraine north of the Black Sea, others east of the Caspian. But what of Rosh, Messhech, and other names in Ezekiel 38:2? Is Rosh, Russia and Meshech Moscow? Rosh cannot possibly be related to Russia, insists the author. Nor can the terms Gog and Magog, no proposed identification for which has yet to win universal consent. Meshech and Tubal, on the other hand, have been located for certain - in central and eastern Anatolia.
148 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1920
21 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
May 11, 2017
3 stars.
The "hook" on the back cover was to disprove the theory linking Rosh, Meshech and Tubal to Russia. He spent precious few pages on this topic, and most of the discussion was his interpretation of prevailing facts (thus, nothing more than opinion), rather than a discussion of new facts or excavations.
The last 4 (of 7) chapters are on the Scythians, and this is rather well done. Along with Chapter 3 on the Cimmerians, it redeems the paltry treatment of the Meschech controversy, as long as you are interested in ancient societies.
The "hook" on the back cover was to disprove the theory linking Rosh, Meshech and Tubal to Russia. He spent precious few pages on this topic, and most of the discussion was his interpretation of prevailing facts (thus, nothing more than opinion), rather than a discussion of new facts or excavations.
The last 4 (of 7) chapters are on the Scythians, and this is rather well done. Along with Chapter 3 on the Cimmerians, it redeems the paltry treatment of the Meschech controversy, as long as you are interested in ancient societies.
Displaying 1 of 1 review