Gesto é um movimento no qual se articula uma liberdade. Embora seja o gesto, enquanto movimento que é, tão determinado e explicável quando qualquer outro movimento, tais explicações não satisfazem porque não atingem a liberdade que se articula no gesto. A competência de uma teoria geral dos gestos seria o estudo das articulações (expressões) da liberdade.
Seria teoria formal, porque seu campo não seria a liberdade, mas as expressões da liberdade. Seria, pois, uma teoria da expressão, uma semiologia. Mas uma semiologia que dependeria das informações fornecidas pelas disciplinas que explicam os gestos objetivamente. A contradição dialética entre dados objetivos e interpretações (decodificações) seria o campo da teoria proposta, por ser o gesto fenômeno que ocorre em tal campo. Ponte entre as ciências do espírito e as da natureza.
Vilém Flusser was a philosopher born in Czechoslovakia. He lived for a long period in Brazil and later in France, and his works are written in several different languages. His early work was marked by discussion of the thought of Martin Heidegger, and by the influence of existentialism and phenomenology. Phenomenology would play a major role in the transition to the later phase of his work, in which he turned his attention to the philosophy of communication and of artistic production. He contributed to the dichotomy in history: the period of image worship, and period of text worship, with deviations consequently into idolatry and "textolatry".
Flusser was born in 1920 in Prague into a family of Jewish intellectuals. His father, Gustav Flusser, studied mathematics and physics (under Albert Einstein among others). Flusser attended German and Czech primary schools and later a German grammar school.
In 1938, Flusser started to study philosophy at the Juridical Faculty of the Charles University in Prague. In 1939, shortly after the Nazi occupation, Flusser emigrated to London to continue his studies for one term at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Vilém Flusser lost all of his family in the German concentration camps: his father died in Buchenwald in 1940; his grandparents, his mother and his sister were brought to Auschwitz and later to Theresienstadt where they were killed. The next year, he emigrated to Brazil, living both in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
In 1960 he started to collaborate with the Brazilian Institute for Philosophy (IBF) in São Paulo and published in the Revista Brasileira de Filosofia; by these means he seriously approached the Brazilian intellectual community. During that decade he published and taught at several schools in São Paulo, being Lecturer for Philosophy of Science at the Escola Politécnica of the University of São Paulo and Professor of Philosophy of Communication at the Escola Dramática and the Escola Superior de Cinema in São Paulo. He also participated actively in the arts, collaborating with the Bienal de São Paulo, among other cultural events.
Beginning in the 1950s he taught philosophy and functioned as a journalist, before publishing his first book Língua e realidade (Language and Reality) in 1963. In 1972 he decided to leave Brazil.
He lived in both Germany and the South of France. To the end of his life, he was quite active writing and giving lectures around media theory. He died in 1991 in a car accident, while visiting his native Prague to give a lecture.
Después de leer varias cosas de Flusser encuentro que tiene ideas, aunque no se le da muy bien escribir. Es original, sin serlo lo suficiente como para que me entusiasme.
I was expecting a more intimate description of gestures, their historicity and cultural specificity, which this provides somewhat. It moves a bit too soon to the polemical, however, such as arguments concerning the redundancy of certain gestures, which are abrupt and unnecessary. For example, writing, and the claim that those who wish to preserve it are simply archaic and absurd, and do so for purely self-centered reasons rather than a genuine sense that the gesture has any enduring importance. Maybe that's true, but it is also based on a limited view of what constitutes writing in the first place (though I understand that providing a rich description of a gesture will require setting clear parameters around what that gesture is or "looks like"). The description focuses mainly on the embodied, physical aspects of writing, and although it makes reference to its immaterial elements (such as the nature of thought that comes to fruition in writing), this is done rather insufficiently in my view.
This book is way too complicated to read, and I even think the writer took so much time explaining the smoking gesture... I think there was no need to take so many pages explaining that.
On the other hand, some comparison are really interesting, whilst others are not so much applicable nowadays.