Some firms project an aura of sophistication that helps form and cement a narrative of themselves as trailblazing, agenda setting, institutions where every employee is a genius. DARPA is such an organization. Yet, when its history is examined closely one notices most of the effusive praise and deference reserved for the firm is propped up on hype surrounding a few outsized successes and a studied silence about the astounding number of obviously retarded cash burning monster projects that turned out to be duds. Among the latter are the likes of: an electron powered dome meant to fry incoming enemy projectiles, an invisible fighter jet, sci-fi fantasy style jet-packs, building a moat around Saigon to seal off insurgents, building strategic hamlets to forcibly resettle civilians in conflict zones etc.
DARPA is the go to example trotted out by anti-market ideologues in support of their view that only the public sector carries out cost intensive research and development projects with uncertain returns. A less well known chapter in DARPA's history which gives the lie to that bit of nonsense is one where it was effectively an angel investor in private firms doing work on pet projects of eccentric scientists. Marketing men with no technical or military expertise were hired and placed in managerial positions. Large sums of government money were expended on what amounted to building and testing prototypes of bizarre comic book defense equipment ideas that were the products of back-of-napkin calculations slurred out in drunken shitpost sessions of an assortment of heavyweight scientists and spherical-cow-dynamics experts under the leadership of a buffoon bossman with absolute discretion. DARPA's personnel history provides many counterexamples to the Peter Principle which states people rise to their level of incompetence; there is no height of lunacy to which a determined and charismatic fool cannot rise.