Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki, D.Litt., Professor of Buddhist Philosophy in the Otani University, Kyoto, was born in 1870. He is probably now the greatest living authority on Buddhist philosophy, and is certainly the greatest authority on Zen Buddhism. His major works in English on the subject of Buddhism number a dozen or more, and of his works in Japanese as yet unknown to the West there are at least eighteen. He is, moreover, as a chronological bibliography of books on Zen in English clearly shows, the pioneer teacher of the subject outside Japan, for except for Kaiten Nukariya's Religion of the Samurai (Luzac and Co., 1913) nothing was known of Zen as a living experience, save to the readers of The Eastern Buddhist (1921-1939), until the publication of Essays in Zen Buddhism (Volume I) in 1927.Dr. Suzuki writes with authority. Not only has he studied original works in Sanskrit, Pali, Chinese and Japanese, but he has an up-to-date knowledge of Western thought in German and French as well as in the English which he speaks and writes so fluently. He is, moreover, more than a scholar; he is a Buddhist.
Daisetsu Teitaro Suzuki (鈴木 大拙 貞太郎 Suzuki Daisetsu Teitarō; rendered "Daisetz" after 1893) was Professor of Buddhist philosophies at Ōtani University. As a translator and writer on Buddhism and Eastern philosophy, he greatly helped to popularize Japanese Zen in the West.
Satori can happen at any moment for anyone, offering a glimpse of insight into everything, and it is good to know the thoughtful Daisetsu provided a manual to let us in the West know what to do when it happens, how it connects to a revered practice of meditation and inner peace made popular in parts of Asia. This book is more than a Hitchhikers’ Guide to far out wisdom of the Far East, but a rather more sensible understanding of the many incarnations of Buddha, the Bodhisattva and Arhats who inspired such contemplative devoting across India, China and Japan. There is also the intriguing notions about space and time, particularly an understanding of place in both the past and future, that is understated throughout the prayers, teachings and admonitions that curiously get treated like it ain’t no thing, and perhaps there is some subtle proof that then and there is no different than here and now.
Starts off nice and easy and then whammo! Right into the thick .. If you can make it through all the triple-non-logic then you may find some choice gems .. Last sections seem skippable but don't skip'm .. The two Ox sequences are good ..
And, for- what i thought was- a 'cool' 'non-religion' there sure are a many "don't"s and "nor"s and "[it is and it is not]"s .. Hahaha
Overall: Nice reminder to chill out
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
I am not sure I was ready for this book as I was hoping for more of an introduction to Buddhism and in this found many of the texts. I found it dense and difficult to understand, with many words I don't know or recognize. However, I was moved by several sections, including the taming of the ox (mind?!) and koans.
Not for anyone new to Zen. it is not a manual in the sense of a hold-your-hand instruction for the path. it seems to be more of a curated collection of excerpts of classical zen texts. I found many of them deeply meaningful, and it definitely helped my practice.
The companion volume to Suzuki's Introduction to Zen Buddhism, this is mostly of collection of source materials and quotations from great Zen masters like Dogen or Hakuin. For this reason it's better to read the other book first if you can, although there are still some notes and explanatory sections here.
"There is really nothing to argue about in this teaching;
Any arguing is sure to go against the intent of it;
I felt this book started off rather slowly with the Indian Sutras and whatnot. They were a little to imaginative and difficult for me to digest. However, once it got into the Ch'an masters, it became quite a boost to the soul. Some of the art and explanations on Japanese Zen, later in the book, were highly interesting, as well.
TORTURE! I don't think religion should be so abstract and mystical. Good grief this was hard to understand. I've known wonderful Buddhists in my life, but this manual? Not accessible for me. I think religion should be accessible.