Neutrul: Note de curs la Collège de France, 1977-1978

by Roland Barthes, Alexandru Matei (Translator)

Roland Barthes a ținut acest curs la Collège de France în 1978. Prelegerile sale se concentrează asupra a douăzeci și trei de figuri, numite și trăsături sau scânteieri, ale dorinței de neutru în limbaj, în gesturi, în viață și în texte (literare și filosofice, dar mai ales texte ale filosofiilor orientale și mistice).

Genres: Philosophy, Nonfiction, Theory, Art, Essays, France, Photography

360 pages, Unknown Binding

Published January 1, 2017

About the author

Roland Barthes of France applied semiology, the study of signs and symbols, to literary and social criticism.

Ideas of Roland Gérard Barthes, a theorist, philosopher, and linguist, explored a diverse range of fields. He influenced the development of schools of theory, including design, anthropology, and poststructuralism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_...

Reviews

[Halle]

If I had a choice between reading this book again and shoving an ice pick into one of my eyes, I would shove an ice pick into BOTH of my eyes to eliminate the chance of me ever even looking at this book again. I have never loathed something more. This is the sort of hooey that pompous “intellectuals” ram down their throats and go out of their way to “absolutely ADORE” and constantly regurgitate in conversation in an effort to feel superior to those, like me, who just don’t get it. My sincere apologies if you DO like this text and aren’t an exhibitionist, but holy MOLY this was a painful book to read and discuss. Never again.

[Matthewaqq · Rating 5 out of 5]

I define the Neutral as that which outplays the paradigm, or rather I call Neutral everything that baffles paradigm… Whence the idea of a structural creation that would defeat, annul, or contradict the implacable binarism of the paradigm by means of a third term.


...every inflection that, dodging or baffling the paradigmatic, oppositional structure of meaning, aims at the suspension of the conflictual basis of discourse.

[Plume 5085 · Rating 4 out of 5]

Très représentatif du génie barthésien: qui d'autre aurait pu mener un cours magistral de 13 semaines sur le 'neutre' ?

[emmarps]

Le tout est assez difficile à suivre, le texte reste très brut, sous forme de notes avec abréviations et sigles, ce qui n'est pas toujours accessible surtout pour un.e lecteur.ice (comme moi) qui n'est pas très familier.e de tous les concepts convoqués ici.

[Eoin · Rating 5 out of 5]

Simultaneously illuminating and complexifying, an elegant, necessarily incomplete discussion of the non-paradigmatic in an exceptionally well designed book. Difficult, but not imposing. Worth it for the subtle shrug of French tone.

[Philipp Homan · Rating 5 out of 5]

Man muss dieses Buch nicht von vorne bis hinten lesen (kann aber ruhig), aber was man wirklich lesen sollte, sind B.s Ausführungen zur Frage als Form. Er haelt sie, woertlich, fuer terroristisch. Warum? Weil sie eine Antwort will, und das Nicht-Antworten als Option nicht zulaesst. Die Frage - das haben auch andere erkannt (z.B. Canetti in Masse und Macht; er arbeitet dort die Invasivitaet und Gefaehrlichkeit der Frage unvergesslich heraus) - enthaelt insofern auch eine implizite Drohung, und Barthes haelt sie tatsaechlich fuer "die schlimmste Form von Gewalt". Das kann ueberempflindlich nennen, aber lehrreich ist es trotzdem. Parallel dazu lesen: Warum? Von der Obszoenitaet des Fragens (Aaron Bodenheimer).

[Barry · Rating 5 out of 5]

I (heart) RB. What a pleasure to have this peek into his workshop.