Lexham's Studies in Historical & Systematic Theology series continues to astound me.
King's book is excellent. Rightly recognizing the dearth of recent theological reflection on beauty, he writes that the "intent of this work is to explore and develop a theology of beauty based on God's plan in Christ" (1). Whereas some may feel that this "lack" in the literature may indicate a lack of conceptual resources in Scripture, King says that this "lacuna that exists requires a recovery of and reinvigorated attention to theological aesthetics, but it does not require a methodological 'turn' as such. What is advocated, however, is that the locus of beauty and the subject of theological aesthetics be given wider recognition and inclusion in the work and pedagogy of systematic theology within a broadly evangelical perspective" (1). Elsewhere, he notes that studies in theological aesthetics neglect "specifically biblical- and systematic-theological treatment" (7). Brilliantly, King corrects this methodological error with sustained and rich interaction with Scripture, as well as theologians like Irenaeus, Barth, Bavinck, Edwards, and Balthasar.
First, King establishes God's relationship to beauty. He does this by arguing the relationship between glory and beauty. Rather than glory being an attribute, "the immanent glory of God means the same as the altogether perfection of God" (48). Thus, beauty is an attribute that is demonstrated in the works of God ad extra. This gives both an objective (beauty has an ontological basis in God) and subjective (beauty is something which humans can perceive in God's works ad extra) dimension to beauty. King goes on to relate the beauty humans perceive in the works of God to be related to God's happiness in Himself (Beatitude). To condense greatly: God's beauty is an attribute, the quality of his work ad extra, and "the divine perfection ad extra as it is perceived and experienced by human beings that most clearly evinces that perfection of beatitude and sense of delight that belongs to the Trinity ad intra" (65).
The remainder of the book is aimed at clarifying how the works of God (specifically in creation, the incarnation, the cross, and re-creation) have an aesthetic dimension to them. King refers to Scripture's storyline as a "Sublime Comedy: The Theodramatic Form of the Divine Plan" (88). Sublime to indicate towards the theological aesthetic, though he rightly notes that "comedy" is a tad insufficient since the end isn't a mere reversal into the "happy beginning," but a progression into an ending that is "incomparably and everlastingly more glorious than the creation beginning, and is not simply restored to parity with it" (92).
Naturally, these chapters are filled with (brilliant!) exegetical arguments, as well as extended interactions with biblical studies. Pages 171-191 provides an excellent discussion on Christ's identity as the last Adam and true Israel. King writes, "The parallels between Adam and Christ and between Israel and Christ reflect an important aspect of the beauty of redemptive-history . . . in perceiving the 'beauty of the Lord' in the person of Christ, whose glory reflects all facets of his messianic identity" (192).
King's command of a wide variety of theological disciplines is impressive and greatly enriches the book. King's work is exemplary in demonstrating how biblical studies and systematics can (ought to!) work together. King, also, ought to be commended for being a helpful writer. At the beginning of every chapter, he summarizes and anticipates the course of his argument. This shows a scholar deeply invested in helping his readers to behold the beauty of their God.
"The Beauty of the Lord" is a brilliant work that is worth every second of your time. Come for the rigor and brilliance. Leave encouraged and more in love with the God who is beautiful and who does beautiful things.