The author does a great job of carrying the reader through his mindset at the different stages of his life. While it can be read that the author has no compassion, it should be remembered that he is portraying the thinking of a young gangster at that time. He is trying to give the reader a “glimpse at South Central from ‘his’ side of the gun, street, fence, and wall,” which I think he does very well. To incorporate the reflections and realizations he acquired at an older age would have depleted the emotional void in which he acted in his younger days.
While this book suggests there is a cause for the gang violence, I don’t believe it effectively answers the question as to what that is. Perhaps it’s because the answer is too complex. Maybe it’s not even an answer, but a cycle. Like the chicken and egg, what comes first? Obviously we know slavery and suppression of minorities, specifically blacks, came before this gang violence, but at what point does the violence of gangs assume responsibility for the reaction it elicits? At the rate of violence committed in the spirit of gang alliance, why wouldn’t the police force treat them with distrust and violent authority? What the gang members do to each other, “dropping many bodies” (p.14) pales the disrespect they perceive from the police force. In a world where “the only language Fat Rat knew or respected or could be persuaded by was violence. Everything else was for the weak. Action and more action-anything else pales in comparison.” (p.295) then what is different in how some of the police act? Isn’t it the same behavior?... The same “language?” Obviously the police should act ethically as they are paid “protectors.” But the gang world is not exactly an ethical world. It seems that the difference with the police behavior and why it is maddening to the gangs may also be that they cannot retaliate on the police like they can a gang enemy.
“F*&^ the pigs. I was so full of hatred that I could have been ordered to kill a pig-or anybody-and not thought twice about it.” (p.327)
When reading his words and memoir there seemed to be a theme of “It’s ok if I do it, but don’t do it to me.” He states/asks, “I wanted to know why “white folks” hated us so much, were so afraid of us.” (p.328) Well maybe because “Bangin’ aint no part-time thang, it’s full-time, it’s a career. It’s being’ down when ain’t nobody else down with you. It’s getting’ caught and not tellin’. Killin’ and not caring, and dyin’ without fear. It’s love for your set and hate for the enemy.” (p.12) It’s a world where, “The underlying factor that usually got you killed was the principle. The principle is respect, a linchpin critical to relations between all people, but magnified by thirty in the ghettos and slums across America.” (p.102) It’s where a gangster says, “I didn’t care one way or another about living or dying-and I cared less than that about killing someone.” (p.103)
If we allow ourselves to move beyond blame or responsibility, it seems there is a consensus on both sides that in the absence of a protective enforcing presence, a community will protect and enforce itself. This was a communicated theme in Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America by Jill Leovy and is stated in this book.
“Charges stemmed from a healthy beating I had given a stubborn crack dealer who had refused to stop selling his product on my corner... I make no excused for this, and I have no regrets. When the police and other government agencies don’t seem to care about what is going on in our communities, then those of us who live in them must take responsibility for their protection and maintenance.” (p.379)
In addition to giving us insight into the life of a gangster, Sanyika Shakur teaches us that “Per year, the gangs in South Central recruit more people than the four branches of the U.S. Armed Forces do. Crack dealers employ more people in South Central than AT&T, IBM, and Xerox combined. And South Central is under more aerial surveillance than Belfast, Ireland. Everyone is armed, frustrated, suppressed, and on the brink of explosion. (p.70) He states, “For a youth with no other hope in a system that excludes them, the gang becomes their corporation, college, religion, and life.” (p.118) “Bangers… have been victimized at some point in their lives and refused to let it continue – respond with the same violence they receive, if not something more lethal.” (p.100)
Does violence really need to be the answer? It is an honest and very real question…