Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Metaphysics;: An introduction

Rate this book
For a specific description of this book, please see each individual seller offering.

259 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1974

1 person is currently reading
16 people want to read

About the author

Archie J. Bahm

49 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
1 (33%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
2 (66%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for qivy.
46 reviews
February 28, 2023
I wish I could say that I'm just disappointed.

Perhaps I'm simply unfamiliar with philosophy and not used to this sort of writing, in which case maybe this book deserves a 2-star rating. I feel like I just read 200 pages of nonstop word vomit, and I'm slightly annoyed that I'll never get the time I spent reading this book back. There's absolutely no way this book went through more than one read before publishing. Take the following quote (warning: prepare yourself), for example:

"To endure, or to have or be duration, is to remain the same; and to remain the same is to endure, or to be or have duration. Each remaining-the-same in any respect is an endurance or a duration, and each duration is a remaining the same."

Again, I admit I'm not familiar with philosophical writing, but I can't get over how confusing 95% (low-balling) of this book was. If a book has the words "An Introduction" in the title, I think it's a fair request that the writing and language then be somewhat understandable to the layman. I also felt as though Bahm's entire tone was somewhat arrogant, especially in regards to science and mathematics, writing off Newton's theories of space-time as mere speculation, a subscript beneath some "other theories of time". Seriously?

I couldn't help but laugh when on page 133, I read the words, "At this writing, I do not recall a specific clear example," in reference to some nonsense semantics about cause and effect. If the author can't bother to research some examples for his introduction to metaphysics book, I don't think it's worth the bother of reading. But maybe this book just wasn't for me, in which case you can ignore my warnings and struggle through the read for yourself.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.