Being you a graduate or not, this ‘Social Theory’ stands out as a broad account on the sociologies which set in motion since Parsons, that is, since the forties and fifties, an overwhelming account worthy reading, as I said, so much for the novel students as we the people who have finished our grade on sociology but still we need to fill out those empty spaces relating to certain authors an theories.
As for me, now (after the reading) I’m able to understand a little better some currents whose key points turned out unfamiliar for me, those of Luhmann, Habermas or the American pragmatism, the latter with its claim that thinking and action are not things apart.
These disparate sociological endeavours tackled by Joas here are all regarded under the prism of the sociology as a research of three basic issues: action, order and social change. Bourdieu’s insights, for instance, Joas asserts, lacks from a more comprehensive approach in terms of action: if the social actors conceive of themselves as capital(s) searchers and the social struggle are always interest(capital)-based, if the matter we talk about doesn’t go on further from the means, we’re leaning towards a utilitarian model in which people have their ‘preferences’ (a classic utilitarian term) and society is no more than a space where resources are shared out, many times in an unfair way.
Joas himself is a scholar hugely oriented toward the reflexion over the action, as he demonstrates in the chapter on neo-pragmatism.
Finally, I would like to say that every page of the Joas’ book succeed in expressing complex and very abstract ideas by means of a rather clear language and very well structured chapters. Certainly, ‘Social Theory’ is a must-read.