A tidy summary in six chapters of the history of aesthetic study and reasoning, and my only conclusion is that we are still arguing over the proper way to identify an art object and which philosophy of appreciation is best. This is good stuff to know and have at hand as an artist, but it makes my head swim with all its deconstruction of terms. (Perhaps Deconstruction is the best way to go?)
It seems we pick and choose pieces of all movements of aesthetic appreciation and still have unresolved questions in each. I continue to find Danto's theories the most pertinent for me today, but this is a little like ascribing to a religion: I find this or that comforting, so I pick the one that best suits my needs.
Berbagai cabang, berbagai mazhab dalam estetika dibahas dengan baik dalam buku ini. Selain itu, penulis memberi rumusan sendiri mengenai definisi estetika yang selama ini dianggap sesuatu yang mustahil. Sebagai buku pengantar teori estetika, buku ini sangat baik menurut saya.