What do you think?
Rate this book


253 pages, Kindle Edition
First published September 8, 2017
“Everything was real, Victoria Cadence.” Nathaniel stroked his thumb over her lower lip, aching to again familiarize himself with that flesh. “Every stolen meeting, every pledge I made you, every word of love were the only real things in my life,” he whispered, when his career with the Brethren had made his existence one of lies. “I would have you know that.”This was an enjoyable read and while it won't be a reread for me, I definitely recommend it. People who like 2nd chance romances will ADORE this book, and both leading characters were fantastic.
Nathaniel Archer, the Earl of Exeter, had gone from a once battered, beaten, and bruised spy captured by an Irish radical to leader of the Brethren of the Lords. Shaped by his imprisonment and two years of torture, he’d become a man who’d no time for anything or anyone outside the Brethren. His work filled his days and nights, and had become the family he’d never had nor would ever have.Victoria's feelings are very vividly portrayed and I had such sympathy for her. She loves her children and can never regret her marriage, because it gave her them, but she had had such dreams when she was younger, and wanted to do so much more. Both of them feel like life has slipped past them.
She’d blinked and her life had passed in a blur of tedious ton functions and creditors calling to pay for the debts racked up by her husband. Time had marched on, erasing the blush of youthful splendor. She’d lived solely for her son and daughters. Now, what remained were three grown children; two of whom were married and another who’d little interest in her, or the idea of family. She’d told herself that her children were enough, only to find she could admit the truth—she’d wanted more. And she hated that she was forced to confront all she’d lost and all she’d desperately wanted for her life. She’d wanted a partner at her side; someone who would have loved her and their children, who’d have gardened with her and, in their advancing years, journey to places she’d always longed to go to, but never would have dared to go as long as there had been young children.
(a) Chapter 3: If Victoria was three and forty at present, eight and ten the last time she saw Nathaniel, then it should had been five and twenty years, not four and twenty.
(b) Chapter 4: If this book started in 1820 and Adam Markham's captivity happened in 1802 (My Lady of Deception), then Adam and Georgina should be only married for 18 years, not more than two decades.
(c) It was also mentioned in My Lady of Deception that Georgina Markham (née Wilcox), Adam's wife, that Georgina had been helping the Brethren for four years. It means that Georgina had been aiding the organization since 1798 (1802 minus 4). Assuming that Nathaniel was taken captive on Georgina's first year (1798), then he won't be gone for 24 nor 25 years but only 22 years.
(d) Chapter 17: In chapter 11, it was revealed that Phoebe was three and twenty years old, but in this chapter, it was alluded that she was four and twenty. Victoria was three and forty, it was mentioned that Phoebe was 19 years younger than her. 43 minus 19 is 24. So what was really Phoebe's age?
* Writing a story isn't all about proper grammars, consistency and correct math are also important.
(a) Chapter 5: If Nathaniel was titled twenty years earlier for acts of bravery and heroism, how could have Victoria missed that? I'm pretty sure that news was big and celebrated especially it was about ferreting out Napoleon's battlefield plans.
(b) Chapter 11: I find Victoria's respond daft.Nathaniel: “I should have made you my wife before I left.”
Victoria: “Then I would have never had Justina and Andrew.”
Nathaniel was only gone for 2 years and when he comes back, they could have their own Justina and Andrew and possibly more passel of children. Or if Nathaniel really died, she could remarry and have more kids.
Seriously, if a woman has a loving nature and maternal instinct, whomever impregnated her whether accidentally or intentionally, she will see the child as a blessing and will love the child no matter what.
(c) Was Mr. Donaldson, the real murderer, that idiotic that he didn't even know that Chester (the erstwhile Viscount Waters), Victoria's late husband, a peer, a peer (for crying out loud!) was married?! And it took him many years to discover that?? He seemed like a savvy businessman based on the description, so he definitely had wide connections. There would at least 2 or 3 would know that Chester was unavailable as it was widely known that there was a Viscountess Waters; their marriage wasn't a secret. It wasn't as if the Donaldsons were living and doing business in another country that that vital information eluded them. Luton was only 34.2 miles (55.04 KM) from London.
(a) Chapter 7: It was ironic that Phoebe said she'd not tolerate someone speaking for her. As such, she'll not speak for her sister, however, she spoke for her brother.
(b) Here I thought that Andrew had matured after To Enchant a Wicked Duke. Apparently, he was still wearing his little boys panties.
(c) How would a gently-bred lady know how to click a gun and bandage a stab-on-the-chest wound? (Chapter 14 and 16) I don't think handling a gun and advanced first-aid was one of the ladies lessons.
(d) The case was easily solved after all the heavy drama. Simply because a vindictive asshole, the Marquess of Tennyson, who had been so focused on his own individual absolution, that he had put the important detail before the organization. Yet, Tennyson wasn't dismissed for his selfish negligence.
(e) I suppose it would be complete if there was a tear-jerking father and daughter reunion scene.