i found the historical detail interesting, but overall the book too overtly religious, i.e., a bit too preachy. i have a problem with religious fiction if it leads the reader to believe that they are somehow morally superior just for reading it; that view just increases the polarization in society.
the protagonists are clearly depicted as more righteous and thus more deserving, but they aren't completely without sin. the theme is as old as time; the hope of the under-trodden that good will ultimately conquer evil.
nevertheless, there is a double standard--as there is in the real world, unfortunately--in that the female's selfish interests are deemed sinful, while the man's are not; theirs are 'only natural', cloaked as ambition or whatever. men are allowed their pecadillos, but women must be virtuous at all times or suffer devastating loss. other characters are too 'black and white'--good or evil, with no in-between--which isn't realistic and reveals the flaw in logic that is sadly typical for many 'christians' today, that is, if one simply claims to be christian--by braying publicly about how devoted one is to god but but then sins without compunction in private--one is still automatically superior to those who [more admirably] keep their religious views to themselves and respect others who do not share the same views. theologian and writer scott peck said in one of his books that many of the worst sinners can be found hiding in the church, in amongst the so-called 'righteous', and i have to agree.
we're all flawed, but those who claim moral superiority yet brazenly conduct evil are the most hypocritical--and the most dangerous, such as the so-called 'moral majority', many of whom are so filled with hate there is no room for love. which is sadly ironic, since that was christ's entire reason for incarnating, to spread the gospel of love and forgiveness--to *all*, not just a select few. he came to abolish the old commandments with one--that we love each other as we love ourselves. this is good news, so why do we still cling to the old testament religion of judgment and retribution? not one of us has the right to judge, yet we all do it.
we all know that hypocrites, extremism and ignorance can be found in any society and any religion. because terrorists scream 'death to the infidels', the majority-christian west in fear lumps all muslims with extremists, because our media controls what we see and hear about a culture foreign to most of us. fortunately there are some willing to stand up and say that terrorists do not represent true islam. i'd like to say the same is true here, that the average american just wants to live in peace and that the 'moral majority' does not represent true christianity. but i worry that these radicals--which is what they are--have a stranglehold on politics here, just as adamant as terrorists about forcing their views on the majority.
sigh. in the words of jesus the christ, 'they know not what they do'. but we should.
if we truly wish to inherit the kingdom of god, we need to humble ourselves, ask forgiveness, and live the message of love, not just talk about it.
this has become more an editorial than book review, but this genre warrants special attention because it is overtly religious and conservative in view.
we should remember that reading is a luxury for many in the world. we may live in comfort and have easy access to books, but half the world is starving, homeless, or worse. it's easy to say we are christian--or muslim or jew--but forget, or ignore, that that requires action, positive action, not just words. we're fooling no one but ourselves if we profess to be righteous but do nothing to alleviate the suffering around us.