I have a lot of feelings about this one that are conflicting just because it's an anthology -- if I rated each contribution individually, my ratings would probably run the entire range of five stars down to zero.
The collection is very diverse in a number of respects -- diverse in terms of the voices included, of magical/Pagan/spiritual/religious traditions that they work in and discuss herein, of the genres of writing, and of the focuses/topics. This is great. It inevitably means, of course, that any reader I feel like is going to find some parts more interesting and/or relevant to them than others, but in an anthology that is, to me, to be expected, particularly when it deals with subject matter that is so incredibly personal.
As mentioned, there were contributions in here that I absolutely loved and know I will return to. A few I found might even inform some shifts in my own practice. Editor Lee Harrington's essay on interstitial elements was a definite standout for me. I enjoyed editor Tai Fenix Kulystin's essay as well. Others I found interesting, enjoyable, and/or just well written and well thought out, but were not necessarily quite as relevant feeling to me personally. Quite a few I just felt 'meh' about -- okay, but not especially interesting to me (though that's not to say they won't be to another reader), or a few that just seemed like they weren't really saying anything substantial at all. Then there were a handful that I did find downright problematic (often this was due to binary-reinforcing and/or biologically essentialist language though there were other issues too - one full of concerning ill-informed claims about trauma really stood out in the worst possible way for me; some of the discussions about reframing sex felt less than inclusive - but I feel like getting into each is beyond the scope of this review).
I like that the editors included short bios of every contributor, and I also liked that visuals (drawings, paintings, photos, sigils) were interspersed with the writing.