Deconstructing Race: Multicultural Education Beyond the Color-Bind

by Jabari Mahiri

How do socially constructed concepts of race dominate and limit understandings and practices of multicultural education? Since race is socially constructed, how do we deconstruct it?

In this important book Mahiri argues that multicultural education needs to move beyond racial categories defined and sustained by the ideological, social, political, and economic forces of white supremacy. Exploring contemporary and historical scholarship on race, the emergence of multiculturalism, and the rise of the digital age, the author investigates micro-cultural practices and provides a compelling framework for understanding the diversity of individuals and groups.

Descriptions and analysis from ethnographic interviews reveal how people’s continually evolving, highly distinctive, micro-cultural identities and affinities provide understandings of diversity not captured within assigned racial categories.

Synthesizing the scholarship and interview findings, the final chapter connects the play of micro-cultures in people’s lives to a needed shift in how multicultural education uses race to frame and comprehend diversity and identity and provides pedagogical examples of how this shift can look in teaching practices.

“Jabari Mahiri’s superb Deconstructing Race is the best modern book on multiculturalism in education. More than that, it can be the beginning of a vital transformation of the field and of our views about diversity.‘

—James Paul Gee, Mary Lou Fulton Presidential Professor of Literacy Studies, Regents’ Professor, Arizona State University

"Deconstructing Race provides a framework for a new American narrative on race based on irrefutable research and inspirational evidence."

—Yvette Jackson, chief executive officer of the National Urban Alliance for Effective Education

240 pages, Kindle Edition

Published July 28, 2017

Reviews

[Jennifer Landrum · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book, like so many of its kind, is written for people that do not need to be persuaded to be more social justice minded. The rhetoric in the first chapter would turn off the moderate minded. I liked the phenomenological approach and only wish that the author had led with more historical data to broaden the audience.