Wow, I'm amazed at the 4-star and 5-star reviews of this "historical novel"--which reads like 70% history, 25% psychological speculation, and only 5% novel. Don't get me wrong: I love studying history. People whose reviews consist of gushing over the amount of research the author put in are completely neglecting the fact that he CHOSE to use that research to write a novel, not a history book, and it's barely a novel at all. Apparently as a retired attorney, he felt unqualified to publish a book of history, so he chose to write a "novel", but, to me, it just doesn't work. For one thing, there are far too many characters (I say this as someone whose favorite novel is "War and Peace"!), and the Caribbean characters do not have distinct enough personalities to track them against the completely unfamiliar names used for places we modern readers know as the Bahamas, Haiti, Dominican Republic, and Cuba. (For the entire novel, I thought "Bohio" was referring to Puerto Rico--which, as it turns out, was never in the novel--that's how confused I was.) (Incidentally, I did read this on Kindle, so I was probably hampered by not being able to see the maps given.) For another thing, his treatment of the Catholic faith appeared to be his own speculation about how Columbus and Iberians went through mental contortions to reconcile their Christianity with their brutality against non-Catholics. I could just as easily speculate their mindset myself as being hypocritical, corrupted by power, corrupted by money, or even just phony, but my speculation is simply that. His efforts to imagine these characters as having genuine but convoluted Christian beliefs leaves them all having bizarre internal dialogues which simply do not succeed as fleshing them out as believable characters. He does accurately point out that Africans, Ottomans, Arabs, Greeks, Italians, AND Caribbeans were all taking slaves, so it is that much more belabored that he spends so much time on Columbus, Isabella, Ferdinand, and King John's speculated religious beliefs to come up with his own theory of how they reconciled Catholicism with brutal slavery (not to mention the expulsion of Jews and theft of their property). The author's efforts to speculate these internal beliefs, for me, is just too belabored to produce characters with authentic internal dialogues. Thus they never rise to the level of fictional characters--they remain historic figures with superimposed psychological speculations, and this reader just could not get immersed emotionally at all (except for the enslaved Caribbeans who actually WERE fictional characters!). This is a very ambitious novel, and you will certainly learn a lot historically, but I do wish that the author had spent more time researching how to write a NOVEL.