Hallelujah! It's over! Praise God!
Excuse me a moment while I go purge Piper from my to-read list. There. Done. Never again will I read another one of his books.
This book was disappointing on so many levels. It had a great title! Whose promise was never delivered. It had a couple of good chapters, at the beginning. I started it full of expectations, hope, and innocence, it quickly turned into disbelief, despair, and even a bit of anger.
I did not like this book. It was extremely difficult to finish reading it. I desperately didn't want to finish it, but it's important to read books you dislike, by people you disagree with, if only to sharpen your arguments against them.
I hated this book for several reasons, one is for how Piper takes things out of context right and left. Now, every author who writes about the Bible cherry-picks to some extent. The Bible is very long, and there is no way to write about everything that is in it, you have to limit the extent of what you are focusing on. However, when you are limiting your focus, you can't just completely ignore things that contradict the philosophical construct you are building, and Piper does exactly that. His basic idea is that Christians should live a 'Christian Hedonistic' lifestyle, where we live for our own joy which he defines as finding pleasure in God and in doing what he wants. Okay, nothing objectionable there, except everything implied by the word 'hedonistic'. Piper has obviously faced a lot of criticism about his use of that word, as evidenced by an entire prologue justifying his use of it, two chapters, and an appendix defending himself against basically every current day theologian. (You would think if all of these people were writing well thought out and biblical critiques he would pause for a moment and reconsider his usage, but nope). He's faced a lot of criticism and he defends himself by giving a partial definition from a dictionary. Partial. Hedonism is living for the purpose of your own pleasure. Yes, that's partially the semantics of the word. But let's focus on that word 'your own' as in 'self'. Hedonism is pleasure of the self, you cannot simply sneak God into it by saying that you are pleasing yourself 'in God'. That's like saying pleasing yourself in sex. Sex is the tool by which you are pleasing yourself. God has become a tool. Piper skeeters off this by saying something to the effect that God doesn't care that you are using him as a tool because what God wills is being done, never mind the fact that it is being done in a mercenary manner. No, it cannot be mercenary because it's for God.
Not only that, but Piper is ignoring the part of hedonism where it's living for the pursuit of the pleasure of the now. There is no consideration for the future self, future others, family, nation, state, world, anything. You can't just ignore that part of the definition, which Piper does. He says we live for pleasure in God, we experience, joy, delight, satisfaction, and pleasure in God....in heaven.
No duh.
That's kind of the definition of heaven. And definitely not the definition of hedonism, I'm pretty sure that has another term, could it be 'delayed gratification'? But no, let's not use the term that everyone knows and understands, let's twist the word 'hedonism' around into something that it never meant, and will never mean and give it something new and exciting, so that we can present really basic Christian truths like 'don't steal' 'pray' and 'give tithes' a breath of fresh air.
It's not only basic English and Greek words that he uses out of context, it's the Bible itself. He takes all sorts of verses about delighting in the Lord, and being glad, and defines them out to an extreme, then ignores other verses that go against his idea. At one point he said 'If we do not find pleasure in doing God's work, then God doesn't find pleasure in us'. Pardon me, but Christ sweat blood in the garden because of his suffering in view of what he was going to have to do on the cross. He begged God to make a different path for him. Yes, he went through the crucifixion and carrying our sin for us, but he wasn't doing it while singing praises and having a grand time of it. He suffered. He told us 'take up your cross and follow me.' He never claimed following him was going to be roses and butterflies of joy. He promised it would be difficult, involve sacrifice, and persecution. He promised that there would be times of joy, and times of sadness, times of dancing, and times of crying. Piper completely ignores the suffering half of the equation.
It's not only basic biblical truths that are twisted out of alignment in this book. If you were to read this book you would think that historical theologians of all backgrounds: Barth, Augustine, Edwards, Chesterton and Lewis all agreed with Piper that 'christian hedonism' was the way to go. That seeking after the feeling of joy and pleasure was the end all and be all of Christianity. Well, maybe Barth, and Edwards would agree with him, after all, I've never read Barth, and only read 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' by Edwards, so for all I know that is what they say. But Augustine? Chesterton? Lewis?!!! I've read nearly everything Lewis has ever written and he would have some exquisitely polite British barbs for the sheer audacity of Piper to so misrepresent his way of thinking about Christianity. Lewis struggled for years with his relationship with God because he never experienced transcendental joy or a conversion moment. His coming to Christ was gradual, and intellectual. God found him through his mind and through his reason and through his attraction to mythology. God is cool like that, he will approach each person as an individual, finding the chink in their armor that will open up their heart. One of Lewis' greatest points was that feelings are transient and you cannot use them to measure your relationship with God. Feelings will change. You cannot cling to them. If God blesses you with joyful worship, thank him for it, enjoy it and praise him for it, but don't try to cling to it. It will pass, and even though it passes it doesn't grant you absolution to cease worshiping.
Honestly, Piper should read a bit more and actually think about what people are saying instead of reading to justify his own ideology.