The literary memoir "The Rules Do Not Apply" is all about a privileged white woman who has led a charmed life. The author has been raised to assume she has control over all aspects of her life because nothing traumatic has ever happened to her, or anyone in her family, and she has had a successful writing career, according to plan. She has grown up believing she should "have it all" in life, and she actively pursues that goal throughout childhood and into her adulthood.
Author Ariel Levy assumes that this message of "having control" and "having it all" in life was a lesson of feminism. At age 38, the author uses medical intervention to become pregnant for the first time, but suffers a miscarriage five months into her pregnancy. Due to this tragedy, Ms. Levy suddenly realizes life is uncontrollable, and is a terminal event for all of us (she figures out that we all have to die). She also realizes that she does not have control over life, and she is now forced to accept that she cannot "have it all." Ms. Levy blames her lack of control, and her inability to "have it all" on feminism. Her memoir touts the belief that feminism has failed her.
It is difficult to type a review when my skull is full of such utter loathing for a book. I don't hate the author for sharing what she has suffered; I hate that Ariel Levy chose to universalize her experience as representative of ALL women, and then blame the vagaries of life on feminism. As if feminism were responsible for the placental abruption that caused her miscarriage. As if feminism were responsible for her spouse being an alcoholic, or the cause of the author's adultery. As if feminism were responsible for alcoholism and adultery ending the author's marriage.
News flash, Ms. Levy: PRIVILEGE and ENTITLEMENT teach the lessons that life is always within your control, and that you deserve to "have it all."
FEMINISM teaches: that those who possess any kind of female genitalia or feminine gender are human beings, and that ALL human beings deserve equal access to dignity, legal rights, opportunities, experiences, education, and love.
Here are some examples of how Ms. Levy (who was born in 1974) universalizes her privileged experience as a central theme of her memoir.
"We [Ms. Levy and her female friends] lived in a world where we had control of so much. If we didn't want to carry groceries up the steps, we ordered them online and waited in our sweatpants on the fourth floor for a man from Asia or Latin America to come panting up, encumbered with our cat litter and organic bananas. [...] Anything seemed possible if you had ingenuity, money, and tenacity." (page 10)
"We were raised to think we could do what we wanted -- we were free to be you and me! And many of our parents' revolutionary dreams had actually come true. [...] You could be female and have an engrossing career and you didn't have to be a wife or mother (although, let's face it, it still seemed advisable: Spinsterhood never exactly lost its taint). Sometimes our parents were dazzled by the sense of possibility they'd bestowed upon us. Other times, they were aghast to recognize their own entitlement, staring back at them magnified in the mirror of their offspring."
The "we" in that passage on page 10 and 11 walks a fine line between referring to "Ms. Levy and her friends" and a "we" that stands in for "all women of the author's generation."
Here is a place in the text in which the "we" most clearly refers to "all women of the author's generation" and doesn't limit itself to Ms. Levy and her friends alone:
"Women of my generation were given the lavish gift of our own agency by feminism -- a belief that we could decide for ourselves how we would live, what would become of us." (page 69)
Ms. Levy makes it clear she has no idea what feminism stands for -- because feminism most certainly does NOT say you can determine your own fate. Feminism says all people should have the right to make their own choices -- feminism doesn't promise that life will deliver that choice.
But the delusion gets even worse. Here is a passage in which Ms. Levy is comparing herself to her mother, and then universalizing her own desires as the desires of ALL women (not just as the desires of herself and her small group of friends) --
"I wanted what she [my mother] had wanted, what we all want: everything. We want a mate who feels like family and a lover who is exotic, surprising. We want to be youthful adventurers and middle-aged mothers. We want intimacy and autonomy, safety and stimulation, reassurance and novelty, coziness and thrills." (page 90)
I started gnashing my teeth when I read that. Because I am a woman and I do NOT want to be a middle-aged mother. I have NEVER wanted to have a child. Not when I was a child myself, and not as a woman who is now 36 years old.
Feminism lets me know that it's OKAY to make that choice for myself. That I am NO LESS a woman just because I do not want to give birth, and have never wanted to be a mother.
But here is the passage in the book in which it is clear how insulated in her privilege Ms. Levy truly is: when she writes of fleeing her home after finding her spouse (Lucy) has been drinking. The realization that Lucy has been lying all along about her drinking problem precipitates the end of their marriage, and Ms. Levy makes the choice to leave their "island house" immediately --
"I got the keys from Lucy and told her it was time to take a nap -- she fell asleep quickly in our bed. Then I found the kittens and my computer, and got in the Jeep, sweat rolling down the back of my neck, the insides of my thighs. I drove past the mariners' shops in Greenport and the stalwart farms and corny wineries of the North Fork. I looked at the people -- from Guatemala, from Mexico -- working in the fields, the sun pounding down on them indifferently. I wondered if everything that pained me would seem ridiculous to those women, or if some of our problems were the same. The cats roamed between the backseat and the passenger's side in front, pushing their faces toward the air conditioner." (page 119)
That is all the attention those "people/women" receive in this text -- a passing thought smashed between the mention of Ms. Levy's kittens.
But let me point out something important here -- a level of racism that is subtle, insidious, and completely at odds with feminism. Ms. Levy is using a casual shorthand to give her readers a visual on these workers, stating they are "from Guatemala, from Mexico" -- even though she doesn't know anything about these field workers beyond what she can see from her vehicle window. She is traveling across Long Island, back to her home in Manhattan, and making assumptions based on a glance.
In reality, Ms. Levy doesn't know WHERE "those women" are from -- and I have a big news flash for the author -- field workers can be U.S. citizens, born and raised on American soil. Field workers in the United States might have been born and raised ANYWHERE. And I would bet at least some of "those women" working the fields are Ms. Levy's age, fellow members of Ms. Levy's generation, and could have grown up in the state of New York along with her.
And you see what Ms. Levy does? She tells the reader "those women" have dark skin, dark hair, and they look foreign. She tells the reader "those women" don't look American. Because they're "from" a foreign country -- even though all she truly knows about them is what she can see with her eyes.
She did the same thing to the people she hired to deliver her groceries -- when she used the phrase "a man from Asia or Latin America" to describe a delivery person -- based on nothing more than what she can see with her eyes. As if a yellow-skinned or brown-skinned delivery person cannot be born in the United States, or England, or France, or anywhere that is not a developing or communist nation.
The entire memoir is like this: it's the tale of a white woman of privilege who is so insulated in her levels of entitlement, she believes she speaks for "all" women when she cannot even recognize that her class and race have completely Othered the non-white women around her, to say nothing of the women of her own class and race who have never felt entitled to "having it all," or the women who have always understood that life is a terminal event that is not completely under their control.
It's important to note that Ms. Levy tries to equalize herself with the women working in the fields by pointing out that she is sweating along with them. Ms. Levy, with her air conditioner struggling to cool down the inside of her Jeep, is sweating the same way those field workers are sweating in the indifferent sun. As if their suffering is equalized, in the same way she is suggesting that alcoholism, and the consequences of alcoholism, aren't limited to a particular nationality, class, or race. Not only does she Other "those women," but she strives to put their suffering on the same scale as hers.
This memoir taught me that there are accomplished literary elites in the world who would rather blame their problems on feminism than white privilege.
"The Rules Do Not Apply" features Hemingway-esque prose and a severe lack of depth. This memoir is not about universal womanhood, but all the ways entitlement can weaken and debilitate those who are insulated from the hardships of life by their place of birth, skin color, and wealth.