And done.
A thoroughly fascinating read, THE SIEGE OF ACRE presents an in-depth look at the bloody, gruelling and ultimately decisive battle of the Third Crusade. Having read about the siege time and again in other history books, it's difficult to doubt the author's claim that his focused analysis is the first of its kind.
Admittedly a little on the dry side, Hosler provides a wealth of information, detail and anecdotes in a refreshingly short volume. Nevertheless, he manages to capture the length, cost and importance of the battle and a sense of its key players with aplomb.
Those looking for a more insightful examination of the main historical figures should look elsewhere (Gillingham's 'Richard I', Marc Morris's 'King John'), as THE SIEGE OF ACRE works hard to remain objective throughout, drawing on Muslim sources as much as Christian ones.
All the same, while Hosler eschews the timeworn legends of both Richard and Saladin (and Acre was no testament to military genius), the author does betray a little bias towards the end, causing this reader to question his conclusion. To regard the atrocities of the past with the values of today is indeed 'presentism', yes, but how else is one to map their lasting moral impact?
In the end, Hosler leaves us with an unforgettable and worthy impression of the notorious titular ordeal, even if the overall verdict appears to fall somewhat short of the mark.
Two wrongs don't make a right.