KASHMIR: THE VAJPAYEE YEARS (MY REVIEW ON GOODREADS)
When this book was launched in 2015, I too ordered a copy, partly out of curiosity and partly driven by "tsundoku". I heard panel discussions in various intellectual enclaves with people quoting paragraphs after paragraphs from the book. Many respected bureaucrats also shared their reviews and I had read many of those on Facebook. No doubt "Kashmir: The Vajpayee Years" elicited huge excitement and made quite a news.
Still, strangely enough, I never felt the urge to pick it up and read it. The naive reason: it's title seemed to suggest that it was just going to be a humdrum long narration of political events that happened during the NDA's rule at the dawn of this century. On the other hand, The titles "Our Moon Has Blood Clots" or "Curfewed Night" hold you by the finger and lead the way through the pages. So, it remained shelved and kept picking up dust for years.
The trigger to reading it was an interview of A.S Daulat (who co-authered this book with Aditya Sinha) with the veteran journalist Karan Thapar, which was taken post August 5, 2019. The ex spy's crisp replies and confident prophesies would make anyone think how come this guy who is neither a Kashmiri nor a poltician was so authoritative in his predictions.
The book, as it turned out, is a thrilling account of of India's statecraft in the war-torn valley in the last 25 years. It equals the fictional spy-thrillers in leaving its readers spellbound. It's a first-hand account of A.S Daulat, who served as a special director of IB and later as Chief of R&AW, about how India engaged different political actors of Kashmir from mainstream politicians to separatists to hard-core militants. Contrary to what is visible on the outside, the art of statecraft, as is written in the book, is very subtle where nobody is untouchable. It's never black & white or us vs them, as is the general perception. There are layers within layers.
I would often hear political commentators say that conflict in Kashmir has become an industry and their are many beneficiaries who will always keep the cauldron boiling. This book will tell you who holds the laddle and the lid, and how temperature is kept under control. Just enough to boil, but not spoil the dish.
Daulat expands upon the role of ISI & Pakistan, who never hesitated a bit in fishing in troubled waters. First by fanning insurgency and then sustaining it by providing arms training, ammunition and the money. They not only succeeded in creating assests in Kashmir but focussed on guarding them too . Anybody who's grown disillusioned with them or seen to be parleying with India would be "bumped off".As in one of the conversations, a separtist tells Daulat, "You can at most throw us in jail, they shoot."
Daulat gives an insider's account of India-Pakistan relations during the Atal Vajpayee's tenure and how close the neighbours were in clinching a deal and how different thinghs could have been, if NDA had got a second term. He is of the view that Manmohan Singh failed to capitalize on the process which Vajpayee had set in motion. Manmohan Singh himself went on record and accepted later that they had missed the opportunity to settle the dispute once and for all when Musharaff came up with his four point formula.
Daulat also gives a rare glimpse into the working of secret services, how they call the shots and what ails these organizations. As a veteran spymaster, he also shared his words of wisdom in minimizing the turf wars & maximizing their efficaciouness.
Daulat ends the book with many "What ifs": What if Sheikh Abdullah had not been arrested in 1953? What if Shabir had contested the 1996 Assembly Election? What if Vajpayee had got another term? In hindsight, we can think of many ways how history could have evolved. But we fail to understand that sometimes it not meticulous planning that goes into history's making but a chance, unplanned, random event.
If I were to describe the book in one word, it is: unputdownable.