I’m one of those people who never wins anything, so I was pleasantly surprised when I won this book from a Goodreads giveaway (please note – the version I review below is an uncorrected proof).
There isn’t one genre or other that I favour, but this book isn’t one that I would have naturally gravitated toward. Truthfully, I found it difficult to get into the story, and consequently, it took me a long time to finish it. There were elements of the book that I admired; however, I do question the motivations and honesty of the main character, Robert Crofts (/author – The Passage of Love is a fictionalised account of the Alex Miller himself), which impacts on my feelings for the book as a whole. The story did make me think and feel deeply, and I've thought a great deal about it after finishing, which I think is the mark of good story-telling.
Let me explain… (***spoilers below***)
The Passage of Love begins in the first-person voice of an aging author who is aware that there are fewer days ahead than there are behind him. Realising, as he puts it, that he has no part to play in the future, the book is, for the most part, told as a third-person narrative of his past. He announces early on that he must face the greatest unasked question of his life, which is what is found over the horizon line of nothingness? Grace or damnation? And he questions whether he would have the courage to confront the truth of it.
After having finished the book, I wonder whether or not he did have the courage to confront the truth.
The major storyline that runs throughout most of the book is Robert’s relationship with Lena. It is a relationship as unfulfilling as it is fulfilling. As I read of Robert’s thoughts about his initial connection with Lena, to his marriage with her, and his subsequent deep friendship, I admired what I thought was unbridled honesty. It was interesting for me, a woman, to read a man describe his emotions and to feel his awkwardness/bitterness/sadness in traversing a failed passionate love, while at the same time trying desperately to cling to it. However, there were signs along the way that made me wonder whether he was being as honest as he could have been.
Robert doesn’t appear to confront the privilege that his life with Lena afforded him. Wherever he was, he was never content. It seems that there were times where Robert cast blame outside of himself, without considering his role in his present and future. I’m not suggesting that the third-person Robert Crofts should have been expected to be so reflective or self-aware – we all have a right to make our mistakes along our life journeys – but, the first-person looking back on his life has the benefit of hindsight, and I wondered if the older Robert couldn’t see where he might have done things differently if he’d had his time again.
There were little things that bugged me through his life with Lena, e.g. his fascination and repulsion of her body and eating habits, but never pushing her to seek help; accepting things that Lena did without requiring explanations, but letting bitterness creep in because of it; leaving behind his first novel out of that bitterness and spite, and not realising that was a choice, not something done to him; and making so much of his calling – writing – being hard, and letting that affect Lena, when the thing is, passions can be hard, but not everyone is so privileged to move around the country/world to find the ‘right’ place to do them.
It wasn’t Robert’s treatment of Lena (or rather his choosing to stay for so long and being bitter, rather than leaving to live a better life), that really made me question this book, but his relationship with Ann. I have to say, I have never been angrier at the conclusion of a book. It wasn’t even just a case of, well that went a different way than I was expecting, shrug. The situation with Ann made me viscerally angry.
Put in modern turns, Robert is guilty of ghosting a woman who was counting on him to be a part of her life. He turned his back on her without so much as a letter or phone call to assure her he was, at the very least, alive.
This is what makes me wonder whether this book is about really about honesty. The parallels between Lena’s disappearance and Robert leaving Ann are clear, yet even with the knowledge of the hurt such a disappearance causes, he was still able to do the same thing to someone else. This baffled me. I’m not sure if I’ve missed some beauty in this, but to me, this is the crux of this book.
Rather than being a passage of love, the end of this book, the 40-odd years of cowardice, leads me to believe it is a reaction to guilt and a justification for it. Robert got his happily ever after, so that makes the rest of it okay. What angered me was that the answer to the question posed at the beginning of the book appears to be, for older Robert Crofts, at least, grace. In my reading of his story, his actions, are certainly worthy too of condemnation – and, in my opinion, a courageously honest reflection would have admitted this, instead of alluding to it through the difficulties in starting his letter to Ann in the book’s very last lines.
Favourite elements:
• There’s no doubting that the author’s writing is beautiful.
• The descriptions of Australia and elsewhere were detailed and vivid.
• Both Ann and Robert’s best friend Martin were fantastic characters – they were so rich and so honest.
Least favourite elements:
• Switching between first- and third-person – I found this distracting, especially because there were no transitions, i.e. you think you’re heading into a chapter that flows on from the last, but it ends up being a completely different time-period.
• Robert’s lack of awareness regarding how good he had it – e.g. being able to live in different places throughout the world – and that he could have chosen different paths at any time.