Hay una línea, muy trabajada, que vincula a Foucault con Nietzsche, a través de Heidegger. Existe también otra genealogía, menos frecuentada pero igualmente productiva, que llega a Kant a través de Heidegger. En Una lectura de Kant, Foucault se apoya decisivamente en la lectura que Heidegger realiza del autor de la Crítica de la razón pura. La tesis central de Foucault, según la cual la modernidad, y por lo tanto el kantismo, es la época en la que el pensamiento piensa la finitud a partir de la finitud, suena como un eco de las expresiones de Heidegger. Pero Foucault va más allá, pues extiende esta tesis a la problemática general de las ciencias humanas. El interés de Una lectura de Kant reside, entonces, en situarse en el cruce de todos estos caminos. Es un punto de pasaje ineludible para comprender el desarrollo posterior de la obra foucaultiana, pero también un libro que renueva la forma de leer a Kant.
Paul-Michel Foucault was a French philosopher, historian of ideas, writer, political activist, and literary critic. Foucault's theories primarily address the relationships between power and knowledge, and how they are used as a form of social control through societal institutions. Though often cited as a structuralist and postmodernist, Foucault rejected these labels. His thought has influenced academics, especially those working in communication studies, anthropology, psychology, sociology, criminology, cultural studies, literary theory, feminism, Marxism and critical theory. Born in Poitiers, France, into an upper-middle-class family, Foucault was educated at the Lycée Henri-IV, at the École Normale Supérieure, where he developed an interest in philosophy and came under the influence of his tutors Jean Hyppolite and Louis Althusser, and at the University of Paris (Sorbonne), where he earned degrees in philosophy and psychology. After several years as a cultural diplomat abroad, he returned to France and published his first major book, The History of Madness (1961). After obtaining work between 1960 and 1966 at the University of Clermont-Ferrand, he produced The Birth of the Clinic (1963) and The Order of Things (1966), publications that displayed his increasing involvement with structuralism, from which he later distanced himself. These first three histories exemplified a historiographical technique Foucault was developing called "archaeology". From 1966 to 1968, Foucault lectured at the University of Tunis before returning to France, where he became head of the philosophy department at the new experimental university of Paris VIII. Foucault subsequently published The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969). In 1970, Foucault was admitted to the Collège de France, a membership he retained until his death. He also became active in several left-wing groups involved in campaigns against racism and human rights abuses and for penal reform. Foucault later published Discipline and Punish (1975) and The History of Sexuality (1976), in which he developed archaeological and genealogical methods that emphasized the role that power plays in society. Foucault died in Paris from complications of HIV/AIDS; he became the first public figure in France to die from complications of the disease. His partner Daniel Defert founded the AIDES charity in his memory.
This is Foucault, and probably could be nothing else but Foucault. The book is at once a theoretical meditation on Kant's critical enterprise, at the same time an archival investigation into the genesis of Kant's volume on Anthropology that was in the works during the period of Kant's three major critiques, it is at once a Kantian book and at the same time, looks far beyond Kant. It's perhaps even surprising, how little attention does this short volume get within the whole of Foucault's oeuvre for both its own originality, and also, for the ways in which it enables one to better situate Foucault himself in the space between Kant, Heidegger, Nietzsche and beyond. Mandatory reading.
Pretty interesting read. But disappointing over all. This is rather, more interesting for the development of Foucault's own thought then it is for an examination of Kant. Sure, there's some lines that are interesting but really nothing much sticks. It's all so academic and ephemeral. It's a nice review of how to place "Anthropology" which is, of course, what it's an introduction of.
Its kind of like, Foucault finds his problem in Kant's context, and for that reason it might be of interest, although it's also very Foucault-scholarship. So in that sense there doesn't seem to be much about it, since it's internal notes.
But it's also a pretty poor excuse to publish another book by Foucault.
Still it is written well, and can lead you to review Kant again, and find hidden pockets of Nietzsche in Kant. And so I give it a moderate 3 stars.
As I mentioned in my review, Kant's Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View is mostly a charming anachronism. It's completely tangential to Kant's critical work - compiling lectures that, though amongst his most popular when he was teaching (in the 18th century), bear little relevance today.
All this makes Foucault's extended introduction/analysis of the piece, written while he was simultaneously writing his dissertation, somewhat superfluous from the start. Foucault wastes a lot of ink trying to prove Anthropology's centrality to Kants philosophy, pouring over Kant's letters, discarded drafts, and other ephemera. Ultimately, all Foucault ends up proving is that he was a somewhat over-eager graduate student.
Un libro brillante. Una Lectura de Kant contiene una parte de la tesis complementaria de doctorado de Michel Foucault dedicada a la traducción de la Antropología de Immanuel Kant. A esa traducción del alemán al francés le agregó Foucault un estudio introductorio que ocupa la mayor parte de este libro. A la vez, la presentación que antepone Edgardo Castro titulada Foucault, Lector de Kant, provee una extraordinaria guía para la comprensión del itinerario inquieto de Foucault. Básicamente, se trata de una lectura fuerte y original de Kant que emplea elementos de Martin Heidegger, Friedrich Nietzsche y del mismo Foucault. Es un texto central para comprender a Foucault. Las convergencias y divergencias dialécticas entre Crítica y Antropología quedan explicitadas. A la vez, esta tesis abre una vía de acceso a Las Palabras y las Cosas. Opino que es un excelente libro, muy bien cuidado, traducido y comentado. Creo que se trata de una lectura altamente recomendable junto con la Antropología de Kant, la Introducción a Foucault de Edgardo Castro y Las Palabras y las Cosas de Foucault, pasando por La Gran Extranjera del mismo autor.
Certainly not one I’d suggest to many people, but it’s fascinating. It’s very much an academic text written for those familiar with Kant, but the conclusion situates Foucault’s entire project as a Nietzschean response to Kant in a very interesting way
I thought that perhaps I should have a look over this after reading Kant's Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Difficult to get much out of it though on a rather quick read.