DNF. Well... During the Civil War there were no do-goodies. My great-grand-aunt's 1st husband was killed by White Army (cause he wanted no part in that War), her 2nd husband was shot by Red Army for the same pacifist reason, her 3d husband died in Soviet prison (he stole smth to feed the family), and she, herself, was killed by fellow habitants of the village she grew up in (cause she resisted 'nationalisaion' of her clothes and some cutlery); their 4 or 5 kids went to orphans' home and promptly disappeared during the WW2. While the father of this great-grand-aunt was outseas, having not returned (yet!) from the fronts of the WW1, due to severe crippling wounds, her mother was beaten half to death by (surprise!) an outpost of White Army because she refused to hand over to them some very valuable horses. And it was no single ocasion, when a family was punished by every imaginable combatant. The Civil War was a free-for-all, there were no Warriors of Light there, no matter what their colors of choice were (White, Red or Green). Yes, there were Greens as well in there. And they also had nice slogans and did crazy terrible stuff.
I'm sure I'll invest more time in the future to finish it but it's an extremely naive and underresearched try at alternative history, to put it mildly. Though it's a good thing the author demonstrates their understanding that the USSR did not appear out of nowhere on an empty space. They do realise there was a terrible Civil War, which took lots of lives. That deserves a couple of stars of the rating.
The fact that there were foreign hands involved in the Revolution and the Civil War is undisputable, however. Financing of Revolution, foreign ideology - none of those were of Russian origins. Funny, huh, how Europe and its outposts have first helped to install the Soviets in the first place and now keep screaming how bad the communists have been. Very much like some other international threats 'treatment' that we see with our own eyes. And the approach is always the same:
Step 1) 'you motivate + finanse + organise them',
Step 2) 'you declare them a threat',
Step 3) 'you fight against them, as ineffectually as possible'. Is that some kind of money-laundering scheme underway? It's certifiably easier to obtain illicit profits during times of unrest.
And it's easier to govern over people scared of some incomprehensible outer threat. Which is, once again, done via repressing the information about Russia, its history and development. Really, some people have asked me in the past why I think Russia is Christian. Weird question, huh? Very illustrative of their knowledge about what Russian history actually is. Others right away admit they haven't been taught anything at any educational institutions about Russia. Why is that? Why is the World history being kept from the mass audience?
TBC. I'll finish this fairy tale later.