Warning to Readers of “Opium – How an Ancient Flower Shaped and Poisoned Our World”
I want to inform you that the book “Opium – How an Ancient Flower Shaped and Poisoned Our World” has inaccurate and misrepresented data. At least one statistic is also presented in a discriminatory way.
I read the introduction and was not aware of the discrimination until I read chapter four and became suspicious because certain facts seemed wrong.
Here is the introductory sentence that I realized had discrimination and inaccurate data:
“In 2017, 47,600 people died of opioid-related overdoses – more than gunshots and car crashes combined… and almost as many as were killed in the entire Vietnam War.”
After reading the text in chapter four, I decided to double check the CDC data from 2017. I found that the overall total of Murder By Firearms was 39,773.
If the text from the introduction were true it would mean that in the year 2017 the number of victims who died from car crashes would have to be 7,827 or less. For this number we turn to U.S. DOT information where we find the number is 37,133. In other words, the original number for the Opioid-related overdoses IS NOT “more than gunshots and car crashes combined.”
The data in Chapter Four reads as follows “At a time when 13,000 Americans are murdered with guns every year and 22,000 use guns to commit suicide.” The author cites CDC data for 2017 but when I checked the numbers from the CDC they were greater than those he quoted.
Murder By Gun: 14,542 (2017)
Suicide By Guns: 23,854 (2017)
Why would the author round down or underestimate the numbers? Misrepresentation. Or he didn’t double check his data.
In reference to the discrimination the second part of the introductory sentence struck me the wrong way. The Author states, “almost as many as were killed in the entire Vietnam War.” The Author does not list a source and leaves the referenced value to be ambiguous. Now, if we use our Historical Brains for a moment, (Isn’t that what we are supposed to do in a Library?) we can look up the Vietnam War very easily. But, before we do, we have to stop and think. Does 47,600 really sound close to the “almost as many as were killed in the Vietnam War?” No.
Now for the numbers.
If you look at archives.gov you will note that the total records were 58,220. But this number only refers to US military. Usually a war has allies, foes, and innocents. Consequently, if we total all of the numbers we get a much higher figure. TOTAL dead: 1,326,494 - 3,447, 494. (wikipedia)
In other words, it looks like the author used discrimination or misrepresentation and decided to count only the US Military. If we re-read the sentence “almost as many as were killed in the Vietnam War” there is no reference to US Military, or any set group of people. There are also no references mentioned nor are there any mentions of the real numbers of people affected by the War. Even if we just look at the US Ally deaths we get 282,000. Why, then, does the Author only focus on the US Military? It could be convenience because the numbers are a close match, maybe it is pride for his country, or maybe it is discrimination against the Allies, Vietnam Citizens, and the Vietnam Militia.
If it was pride for his country or convenience wouldn’t the author properly cite their sources as to indicate that this number was specific to the US Military? The fact that there are no cited sources raises suspicion that the author knowingly discriminated.
In conclusion, the lack of properly cited sources and ambiguity and misrepresentation of data lowers the credibility of the author. Especially since the data can be cross referenced with records.
Sincerely,
A Concerned Reader