I state this with every Christian non-fiction read, but they all read the same. Strip the author away and you have someone influenced by the same determined language and definitive exclamation as the Puritans. Often, the Christian non-fiction literature of our day is more attune with a time long since past than the time they try to write for. The only times they often dip into the current time is to mention how one is "binging Netflix too long" or "spending too much time on the internet". In pursuit of efficient pastoring, all pastors who have "made it" turn out to be pastors of a single kind. Their abilities are of use only with a single people group. As the church becomes myopic, further and further off the baseline we see in Revelation 21 and 22 in which every tribe, tongue, and nation is worshipping the Lord. Only a specific kind of people will make it, or so writes the modern Christian author.
As for this book, it is a painful read. Perhaps this is not the worst of Christian non-fiction I've endured (certainly not when compared to Sexual Detox, a book where the male Christian author writes that a wife denying sex to her husband by any means implies there is marital drift), but it definitely ranks among the worst. A lot of Christian literature is written to imply pastors are to be pitied, that their work is so intensely arduous that they are to be supported in all their endeavors. Never do they posit that the pastor has poor boundaries, has made promises he could never keep, and is sourly embracing the life of a savior-complex. They never assume pride is at the helm of their church body. And thus, subsequent passages are layered with the word "should", pushing a reader to feel ashamed or guilty for not doing what they "should" have done.
For the Fruit of the Spirit there is no law. Why do so many authors seek to bring law into what is good? Goodness is inherently freeing. To bring "should" brings shame to what otherwise is goodness itself. Why should we be ashamed for not being the "goodest" among the good? Perhaps it is because, in a time and place when Christianity has married itself to capitalism, and capitalism is about competition, you, the reader, must be the "goodest" among the good of the membership. You "should" be this way, even if others will not be this way.
And the goal of such "shouldness" is not to make disciples (of which doing good by obligation is a sour way to plant seeds, and no doubt will poison the root of the convert when they learn of its source), but often to ease the pain of the pastor, or to increase the amount of "tithes" (I use quotations because modern tithing is far from Scriptural tithing. Scriptural tithing is more of a party, a celebration of what the Lord has given to you. A willing recognition of Him as the provider. Very different than what is now considered a glorified "holy subscription service"). And this book becomes so enamored with creating a baseline idea of what a member "should" do that it never creates leeway for when a member has a reasonable, responsible, and rational reason for making choices converse to what Thom S. Rainer is saying you "should" do.
There is a lot of fundamental issues with this book, and I've only hit a few issues here, and perhaps someday I may indulge to write more, but I'll finish with this: be wary of this book. Thom S. Rainer is not our pastor, and he does not know your situation. You may be doing just fine in your church and Satan will use the "shoulds" of this text - the conversion of goodness into law - to shame you for what you are already doing well. Or, perhaps the books "contracts" will guilt you into being a better person, shaming you into doing things you didn't need to do in the first place. Or, maybe it's misuse of scriptural passages, and literal interpretation of the word "member" during a metaphorical passage of scripture will simply send you down a confused spiral. It's not worth it, even at 79 pages.
But, perhaps, as I said in my review of Sexual Detox, if you were to read this book, read it with the knowledge that it, too, is written by a man who is flawed. Be gracious to the man himself for writing something that, I think, is more toxic than it is nourishing. But, be wary of the text itself. Read it mindfully and understand that it is not the Bible, Thom S. Rainer is not your pastor, and membership is not your core purpose as a Christian.