Acknowledgments Preface Francis Bacon: The sphinx Charles Darwin: Recapitulation and conclusion John Dewey: The influence of Darwinism on philosophy Stephen Jay Gould: Nonmoral nature William James: The problem of being Havelock Ellis: What makes a woman Beautiful? Jean Henri Fabre: The sacred beetle Gilbert Keith Chesterton: The logic of elfland Carl Sagan: Can we know the universe? reflections on a grain of salt Joseph Wood Krutch: The colloid & the crystal Jose Ortega Y Gasset: The barbarism of specialization Thomas Henry Huxley: Science & culture John Burroughs: Science & literature Isaac Asimov: Science & beauty Ernest Nagel: Automation Johathan Norton Leonard: Other-worldly life J. Robert Oppenheimer: Physics in the contemporary world Alfred North Whitehead: Religion & science John Dos Passos: Proteus Julian Huxley: An essay on bird-mind Arthur Stanley Eddington: The decline of determinism Aldous Huxley: Science in the brave new world Rachel Carson: The sunless sea Maurice Maeterlinck: The nuptial flight H.G. Wells: The new source of energy; Science & ultimate truth Laura Fermi: Success Samuel Goudsmit: The gestapo in science Robert Louis Stevenson: Pan's pipes Sigmund Freud: Dreams of the death of beloved persons Bertrand Russell: The science to save us from science; The greatness of Albert Einstein Albert Einstein: E=mc2 Lewis Thomas: Seven wonders
What I liked most about this book was it's variety of essays, some of which I never would have read by themselves. At the same time some of the essays seemed fairly irrelevant. All in all it was an enjoyable read. I especially liked the (completely dated) essay which talked about the certainty of vegetation on Mars, while it doesn't reflect contemporary thought it was interesting to read something which was written with some degree of certainty and which has proved to be far from the truth. The change in thought is progress and without it life would be somewhat less interesting.
It has taken me ages to read this book, a collection of essays in Science, mainly physics. Some of them were profound, deeply moving, and others very dated. Some were written so technically that I gave up on them. But despite the age of the book, I enjoyed (most) of the essays in it.
The title is somewhat misleading. A few of the essays are truly great, and some others are interesting. A few are so unreadable as to be incomprehensible.
So many great essays indeed (although some are quite obsolete, mind though I was reading the first published edition from 1940s). Although, I think I must admit I often have problems reading essays, oops.