I can see why this book was a pathbreaking study when it was published. There are a number of points to be taken from the book, particularly, I felt, around procedural justice. The challenge, I think, for anyone reading this book will be to look at how Tyler's work can be adapted to suit local conditions as it were. This is due to the fact that the studies that Tyler relies on and refers to are invariably of a US-centric nature. However, this would raise a number of research possibilities. I did like the afterword by Tyler which, to a degree, brought the study up-to-date by referring to more recent studies. This is important given that the book was originally published in the 1980s.