The victory of Richard Nixon in the US presidential election of 1968 swung on an “October Surprise”—a treasonous plot engineered by key figures in the Republican Party to keep the South Vietnamese government away from peace talks in Paris, costing thousands of American lives. Dirty Tricks provides compelling new evidence of Anna Chennault’s Nixon-approved role in sabotaging the peace talks and ensuring a Nixon White House.
Dirty Tricks also provides the first detailed analysis of the CIA’s recently-released internal history of Watergate, documenting the backgrounds of the burglars and their associations with the Agency in unprecedented detail, and how the Nixon White House sought to implicate the CIA in the emerging scandal. CIA Director Richard Helms’ relationship with Watergate burglar E. Howard Hunt was much closer than previously disclosed and the CIA agent inside the plot was sent on a double agent mission by American intelligence after he got out of prison.
The alleged target of the Watergate break-ins was DNC chairman Larry O’Brien’s phone. Dirty Tricks reveals that the burglars didn't know where O’Brien’s office was and tapped the wrong phone with a bug that didn't work while O’Brien was in Miami preparing for the 1972 convention. Prosecutor Earl Silbert could "never determine the precise motivation for the burglary” but Dirty Tricks explains the political and sexual nature of the calls overheard on DNC official Spencer Oliver’s phone, and why no bug was found at the DNC until three months after the Watergate arrests.
Drawing on newly-declassified files and previously-unpublished documents, Dirty Tricks debunks the myths around Watergate and deepens our understanding of the “dirty tricks” that undermined democracy during the Nixon years. These scandals turn on the covert action of two powerful interest groups—the senior CIA officers around Helms, and the key advisers around Nixon—in this chilling story of political espionage and deception.
Right now, another Watergate book makes about as much sense as another book on the JFK assassination, surely all's been said that could be said on either topic. That’s not true, as new information comes out over time, from newly unsealed files in government vaults, to new revelations from now very aged participants. And there is always the new look from a different set of eyes on old evidence. DIRTY TRICKS: NIXON, WATERGATE, AND THE CIA by Shane O’Sullivan is a little bit of all three, as the author uses sources like the Central Intelligence Agency’s own in-house investigation of its involvement in the Watergate break in, done because a number of participants were either former Agency employees or company assets, a document not declassified until the 2010’s.
The opening section of the book does not concern Watergate though, but the notorious “Chennault Affair” from the closing days of the 1968 Presidential campaign, when President Lyndon Johnson announced a halt in the bombing of North Vietnam in anticipation of a diplomatic breakthrough in the Paris peace talks, a development that might have resulted in a cease fire in the Vietnam War. It also might have resulted in the election of Hubert Humphrey, the Democratic candidate who was fast closing the gap in the polls with Richard Nixon. That did not happen because the South Vietnamese government of President Thieu refused to take part in the talks at the last minute. The opportunity passed, and Nixon won the election narrowly. This came about because Anna Chennault, the Chinese born widow of a prominent World War II American general, and a prominent Republican activist, secretly met with the Theiu government, and told them to hold out, that they would get a better deal with Nixon in the White House. This was rank treason, and though Chennault was called a “loose cannon” at the time (a number of newspapers were on the story), O’Sullivan details how Chennault was in contact with the Nixon campaign through manager John Mitchell, a fact proven by surveillance by FBI, but not confirmed for years. For those not familiar with how Richard Nixon prolonged the Vietnam War to win the Presidency, this section of the book will be learning experience.
The remainder of the book covers the Watergate break in, centering on the men who committed the crime and their targets inside the offices of the Democratic National Committee in the spring of 1972. Nixon and his Palace Guard inside the White House make only fleeting appearances as the spotlight is on E. Howard Hunt and James McCord, the two former Agency employees working for the Committee to Re-Elect the President, the former overseeing the break in, the latter an electronics expert tasked with planting the telephone bugs that would allow them to eavesdrop on intimate conversations. O’Sullivan asserts that Hunt had a much closer relationship with CIA Director Richard Helms than was known at the time, and this raises the possibility that there might have been Agency “mole” in the operation. He also focuses on details and questions that the broader history passes over: if not Democratic National Chairman, Lawrence O’Brien, who was the real target of the Watergate burglars; what were the true loyalties of Spencer Oliver, a lower level party official whose phone was bugged; why was a key to secretary Ida Wells’ desk found in the possession of Eugenio Martinez, one of the burglars, and a former CIA operative; was the apparent incompetence of the Watergate conspirators just a ruse for a black bag job that was supposed to fail; who in the CIA knew what about the plans of Committee to Re-Elect the President, starting with the burglary of the Los Angeles office of Dr. Lewis Fielding, Daniel Ellsburg’s psychiatrist. A lot of attention is given to the “Call Girl Theory,” long pushed by G. Gordon Liddy on his right wing talk show, and though O’Sullivan demolishes some assertions of this out there explanation for the break in, he doesn’t dismiss it completely.
In the end, I have to say that DIRTY TRICKS is best suited to the Watergate junkie, and the conspiracy buff. It’s not an easy read for anyone only casually interested in the history, as much of the latter part of the book gets lost in the weeds of who said what in what report, what obscure piece of evidence was left out on who’s investigation, and who knew who when, and who left out what when questioned where. It’s clear that O’Sullivan did a lot of research – an awful lot – and fell victim to the temptation to shoe horn as much into his narrative as possible. It’s a good thing he included a cast of characters, because it really does become hard to keep these people straight after awhile. Still, there are a lot of readers who love to really get into the weeds, and to whom no detail is too slight or obscure when it comes to history. DIRTY TRICKS is right up their ally.
I am fairly well versed in the Watergate saga, having followed it from the start and read everything I could get my hands on at the time. But this book introduces so many peripheral players that I couldn't keep up, especially since sometimes five, six, or seven new people are introduced in a single paragaph. All of the "he said this to him about him" references meant I had to keep backtracking to reread sentences because it wasn't clear which "him" was saying what about "him" to whom. This book did not clear up anything about Watergate for me.
I enjoyed reading this in depth story about Watergate. There were many mistakes made by many people. No wonder they got caught. Not much mentioned about Nixon. I have to assume his tape recordings got him busted. Nothing was mentioned about the tape eraser. I would have liked more details on that.
I probably would have rated the book higher if the stories were not so complicated and the cast of characters not so large. Either way a good synopsis of the Watergate break-in along with stories about Vietnam & President Johnson’s & Richard Nixon’s involvement in causing the continuance of that war. Scary about how the FBI & CIA were being used in the 1960’s & 1970’s.
Really not impressed with this read, as it seemed the entire narrative was stitched together from news, legal and other documents. The progress was slow because the author kept switching from one concept to another, then pages later returning back to the point. Take a pass on this one.