This is a slim, beautifully designed book of brief stories, essays, about various prisoners Khodorkovsky met in the course of his multi-year imprisonment as well as an explanatory forward, or introduction, explaining why Khodorkovsky ended up going to prison etc.
Mr. Khodorkovsky had become very rich from his oil business (Yukos) and then became involved in civic affairs. He probably was seen as an opponent of Pres. Putin and since he may have been regarded as a possible eventual political challenger, Putin must have decided to put him on trial, and have the prosecutors do whatever it took to find Khodorkovsky guilty. The guilty verdict meant that he was separated from his business, and once let out, he emigrated to England. At least he didn´t meet the fate of Navalny - whom they attempted to poison, or Nemtsov, who was assassinated practically in the shadow of the Kremlin. Considering Russia is supposed to be a democracy, what does suppression of political opponents say about the leadership? Are they so insecure that they must destroy any opposition figures to ensure re-election? Does that betray how unpopular they may really be - such that they fear they´ll lose so they have to cheat - eliminate the opposition unjustly - in order to win?
The overall tone of the book is rueful acceptance of the injustice - and coping with prison life by finding out about fellow prisoners, and recounting their stories, each of which may ironically illustrate some aspect of Russian society, a contradiction that the powers-that-be perhaps would rather not see exposed.
Here are some quotes from the book:
From ¨That´s them over there¨ - about Sergei, on trial for suspected drug dealing
¨He´s been a drug-user for a long time (like most of the young people in his small town)..."
From ¨The Guards¨
¨Sometimes, what takes place in prison seems like a version of ordinary life beyond the prison gates, just taken to a grotesque extreme. Nowadays in ´ordinary´ life, too, it can be difficult to distinguish a racketeer from an employee of an official organization. In fact, does this distinction even exist for most people?¨
From ¨The Witness¨ About a fellow-prisoner, Lyosha, that Khodorkovsky expected would falsely testify against him at the trial of the charges he filed against the administration about a reprimand he received.
¨Lyosha points at the head of operations: ´He gave me two packs of cigarettes and told me to lie.´¨
¨We make a deal with our conscience: we lie, keep quiet, don´t ´notice´ things for the sake of a quiet life, we hide behind the interests of our nearest and dearest. We justify ourselves, saying that ´these are the time we live in,´ that ´everyone else is the same.´ But whom in fact, are we striking that deal with? And how will we know when ´the other party´ -- our conscience -- has refused it? Is it only when we end up facing adversity ourselves? Or is it when we´re near the end and we make that final reckoning of our lives, agonizingly aware that the time for ´dodging the raindrops´ is over and all we have left is memory? But surely by then it is too late to change anything.¨
From ¨The Nazi¨ about a conversation with Sasha, a 19 year-old prisoner who is a Nazi (one of around a dozen at that particular camp)
¨A state that crushes society and stakes everything on the dehumanization of its people does resolve some of its ongoing political problems. Competition for power is weakened. Bureaucracy is able to take advantage of universal apathy and arbitrary political control.¨
From ¨The Suicide¨- about a prisoner who attempted suicide
¨How long can a country survive when indifference becomes the norm? The time of reckoning always comes eventually.¨
From ¨The Rat¨
¨It´s very strange to expect anything positive to come from ´stability,´ when the entire political regime is gradually turning into a nest of greedy, vile rats.¨
From ¨Amnesty¨
¨Cruelty begets cruelty. A society where goodness and empathy are seen as synonymous with madness.¨