What do you think?
Rate this book


226 pages, Paperback
First published October 1, 1992
...are representations of vast landscapes, simplified and geometricized, populated by swarming crowds of tiny figures. The remote ancestors of these compositions are Jan Brueghel the Elder's representation of the Tower of Babel.Lucie-Smith occasionally jars the attentive latin american reader with prejudiced observations. For example in chapter six (Four women and one man) he claims:
Women have played a more prominent role in the history of twentieth century Latin American art than they have in that of other European or North American ModernismSo far so good. However when he goes on to say:
The prominence of women may spring, paradoxically, from the machismo long inherent in Latin American culture. This tends, at its most extreme, to categorize all the art as belonging essentially to the feminist sphere, while the male arena is that of political and military actionhe is, quite frankly, talking through his hat. Art in Latin American art, as say British art, was never considered essentially feminist. Nineteenth century latin american art is not a feminist sphere, neither were nineteenth and twentist century art, photography, literature or music. Latin American was never comparable to, say eleventh century Japan, when japanese men writers assumed women's pseudonyms to write in Japanese, rather than Chinese. Frida Kahlo did not arise because the art world in Mexico encouraged women, she fought tooth and nail to be recognized as something more than Rivera's lover and an artist in her own right. One could, just as incorrectly, claim that the fact that women's suffrage was granted in Ecuador (1929), Uruguay (1932), Brazil and Cuba (1934), El Salvador (1939) and Panama (1941) before it was granted in France (1944) encouraged latin american women to express themselves through art or that this expression was due to the role played by women in the Mexican revolutionary armies (1910-1920) as compared to the role that played by European and US women during the first and second world wars in Europe.
...hated the complacent capitalism of the Betancourt regime which had succeeded the Pérez Jiménez dictatorship.Jacobo Borges may have hated Betancourt's presidency, but to call that presidency a regime is at the very least misleading. Betancourt was the key figure of the (originally) left wing political party Acción Democrática (AD). AD had first seized power in 1945 at the head of an alliance between AD and military officers. In 1947 Rómulo Gallegos, at the head of AD, won the first free and fair popular elections in 20th century Venezuela, only to be toppled by a right-wing military coup in 1958 which eventually led to Pérez Jiménez' dictatorship. AD was banned and most of its leaders went into hiding or were exiled, jailed or killed. AD led the coalition of opposition parties which toppled Pérez Jiménez in 1958, and Rómulo Betancourt was democratically elected President for 1959-1964), moving his party somewhat to left of center, facing attempted coups both from the right and the left wing and standing up against Cuba. He refused to run for a second period and left Venezuela for Switzerland. Betancourt thus started a 40 year democratic period in Venezuelan history that lasted until Chávez.