What do you think?
Rate this book


209 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1999
Our culture has an implacable aversion to age, something that goes far beyond its ugliness and infirmities, beyond the mere selfishness of those who have no time for declining parents, beyond the understandable vanity that would reverse hair loss or lift a drooping bosom, beyond the fear of death, even. People seem to accept that they have to die, but resent the idea of ageing. Yet the process is well under way. Already one has to be careful about what one eats. Already one loves young women without being in love with anyone in particular. Suddenly appetite is no longer quite part of me, or yes it is, but a potential enemy too. A scission is taking place. Do I have to decide what side to stay on? What is the way forward now? Throw oneself into appetite or renounce it. Stay in 'that country' or pack my bag against eventual departure? Where to? Sail the seas with Yeats and come 'to the holy city of Byzantium? City of art and intellect. Of hammered gold and gold enamelling. What kind of a trip would that be? Stay young, the bias of y culture tells me. Look around.
In any even, you are beginning to get the picture. A life suppurating with unpleasant incident. A family where bygones are never bygones. Grudges, hatchets, corpses, are only buried the better to be dug up again. Decay seething with vitality.
That writing is a phenomemon often galvanised by anger is evident enough. How rancorous Shakespeare's plays are! How Hamlet raves and Lear rages! And Swift and Pope and Byron, and Dickens too in his way. Only those who do not understand what a central part such emotions play in life, would consider Eliot's description of The Waste Land as 'one long rhythmical grumble' reductive. What is not so clear is the nature of the writer's rancour, where it came from, what it is about. Could it be this matter is taboo?