***SPOILERS, AND A VERY NEGATIVE REVIEW, IT IS ALSO QUITE LONG, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK***
Page 154. That’s how far I was able to make it before I had to pause and just start a review. I will be finishing this book so that I can have a complete opinion on it, but this was the point where my disbelief could no longer be suspended. It’s funny to think about what small seemingly insignificant thing can be the straw that breaks the camel’s back, but this is what did it for me: strawberries and maple syrup. That sounds so light, so, so obviously normal doesn’t it?
Through reading The Brightsiders, I have had to stop and put the book down and work out my irritation. Just when the book starts to find a track to go down, it has to make a pit stop at ‘quirk avenue: population everyone that isn’t you’. I just- It’s so frustrating to me. I get it, I get that quirky is the new ‘cool’, and that being ‘normal’ is ‘so lame’, but if you’re going to be quirky then at least be quirky.
I’m going to be paraphrasing so that I won’t just be straight copying words out of a book, but if you want to see for yourself then pick up the hard copy and go to page 153 into 154 and you’ll be able to read it for yourself.
The protagonist, Em/Emmy, sits down to breakfast with fruit and pancakes, eats some pancakes with syrup, and then dips a strawberry in her syrup and eats it. And then, and then, a friend of hers at the table says that’s gross and weird. What? I’m sorry...I’m sorry, what? If it was just that one person then maybe I’d think, ‘ok, they’re just picky or it’s just not for them, etc.’, buuuut no. Nope, everyone at the table thinks it’s soooo weird. Another character decides to try it, dips a strawberry in syrup and, I’m not kidding here, smells it, as if strawberries and syrup would make the most odd scent imaginable, and then eats it and -GASP- it tastes good??? What??? And then another character tries it and, again I’m not kidding here, sounds like they’re having an orgasm from tasting how good it is (the word ‘orgasmic’ is literally used). And then the ‘normal guy’ in this scenario that called it out for being ‘gross and weird’ is like ‘wow you are some weird people’ and they all are so proud of themselves.
I...I don’t...I don’t have words for this. I can’t understand this. Strawberries and syrup taste good together? Who would have thought that in a society where we often put strawberries on our pancakes that the syrup would actually taste good on them? What a crazy thought! This just in, french fries are good in ketchup! What was the point of this? What did we learn? That this band that’s literally toured the world has never heard of a concept so craaaazy and wild as strawberries with syrup????
Ok I know this sounds like something to go overboard for, but that’s only because of the preceding 152 pages of tropey quirky fake schlopp I’ve had to wade through to find anything that makes this book worth finishing.
The Brightsiders. How does one properly start a review on The Brightsiders? I guess with the positives. Now, this is the portion of the review where I haven’t finished the book yet, so keep in mind I’m only discussing up to page 154 which is just past the middle mark. As of now I can’t really think of a lot of huge positives since they all kind of play into some of the negatives, but I’ll list what I’ve got:
Racial Diversity
LGBT+ Diversity
A simple, but cute plot
And honestly...That’s about it. Those still lead into negatives, but objectively they are good things about the book. Now, into the negatives, from what I’ve read so far.
LGBT+ Representation: Alright, from what I can see the writer is part of the community, and that’s great, but being a part of the community doesn’t necessarily mean that you can instantly represent so many facets well. I’m not saying that these characters don’t seem accurate, they do, it’s more how they’re portrayed.
This book reads about LGBT+ like it’s something to be explained. Here’s the thing, it doesn’t need explained. In a book where everything is exposition, you have to rely on ‘show, don’t tell’, and this book does the opposite: it overly explains and overly explains, to the point of pulling away from the plot to do so. This isn’t necessary. You aren’t writing a thesis on LGBT+ life, you’re writing first person POV fiction. Books like Leah on the Off Beat and Simon Vs. the Homosapien Agenda manage this very well.
Let me put it this way, if you, the reader of this review, came in contact with one of your friends to hang out with them, are you instantly going to think of every label about them you can and then explain it to yourself? No, you wouldn’t, because humans don’t do that.
I too am part of the LGBT+ community, and while I don’t speak for the community, I can speak to realism. I have many, many friends that are part of this community as is common with most LGBT+ individuals, but I don’t go up to my gay friend and think, “Oh, there’s my friend. He’s gay. And that means he likes boys, and that’s just swell.” or, “There’s my asexual friend. She’s just fantastic. Also, asexual is-actually, no, I would not try to define asexuality in a wrapped up sentence because it is so diverse and I, a mere pansexual transgender mortal, cannot possibly explain it all in one sentence.” For that matter, I’m also not going to go up to my other transgender friends and be like “Oh there are my transgender buddies, transgender is so neat and awesome and super special amazing and it means that you don’t feel right in your body and isn’t that just the worst? My gosh I just can’t think of anything else when I see my friends except for the labels surrounding them.” How about...tell me if they’re funny? Or cranky? How long have you known them? Make me care about these characters!
I will admit that in the first chapter when I saw a non binary character I literally gasped in excitement because I’d never seen that representation in YA literature before. But as the book went on, these characters became more like posters than actual characters. I felt like the writer was trying to shoehorn every letter of LGBT+ so as not to leave anyone out. And honestly, some of the way it’s portrayed is kind of offensive.
For instance, when we first learn that Alfie is gender fluid, Em goes on to say that she didn’t understand it at first and had to do a lot of research. Which is fine, this is something she had to actually work towards to normalize for herself. The issue is how that is portrayed, she literally says something to the effect of ‘all that gender binary bullshit’. Alright, this is where it got offensive to me. I’m not claiming that everything is binary, but different things work for different people. By this I mean, for a non binary individual, or even a gender fluid individual, there is not necessarily a binary for them. But that’s the point: for them. For many others, including transgender individuals like myself, binary can be and often is a very real thing. The experience is different for everyone, so it’s fine to support your fluid or non binary friends because in their case there is no binary, but for others there is a binary. This character claims to be bisexual, but they don’t even understand the basics of what it means to be binary or non. Maybe she’s actually pansexual? I’m not sure. But for cisgender people and even many transgender people, the binary is very real, so to discount it as ‘bullshit’ is to alienate that side of your audience while also taking a step back from the ‘open mindedness’ you’re trying to show. This is very much the Tumblr mindset of bullying something because it’s not your norm. (come for me Tumblr, I really don’t care)
Which brings me to another point. I really think this author is scared Tumblr is coming for them, because they treat everything like they’re scared they’ll get yelled at for leaving something out. The book reads like a ‘how to’ guide to LGBT+, and less like an actual story with LGBT+ characters. Especially when every time they mention the community they say: LGBTQIAP+. I don’t know a single person who uses that outside of term papers. It’s distracting and unrealistic, most just say LGBT, or LGBTQ, or LGBT+ etc, not half the damn alphabet.
To be honest, I could write an entire thesis on just the negatives when it comes to LGBT+ and how it’s handled in this book, but let’s move on.
Racial Diversity: I actually really love that we have a lot of racial diversity here (not for the leads of course, because that’d just be TOO diverse wouldn’t it?), but again, it’s treated as a soapbox. Which really is ironic considering Chloe, Em’s femme non binary friend (this is how the book describes them so it is what I will be using, ‘femme non binary’.). We meet Chloe and they’re described as black (literally, she uses the word black when describing them). But then we learn, wait no Chloe isn’t black, they’re actually biracial And Chloe’s mother is, I’m not kidding, described as *ahem* ‘Tall skinny white blonde’. You can’t make this stuff up, the writer literally put in a straw man for this book. The easiest Tumblr target possible.
And we learn that Chloe’s father was black and then their parents got divorced when they were five and the dad left (because that’s not offensive and tropey: an African American father ditching his family, ouch). So Chloe is left to be raised by their mother. Who, all of a sudden, decides she is racist and hates black people and doesn’t accept Chloe for being half African American AND non binary, so only puts up with them to prove that she’s not racist (but I have black friends! argument). This-This doesn’t happen! This doesn’t happen in real life! What parent raises their biracial child with their differently raced father for five years and then wakes up one day and now hates said race? That doesn’t happen! You literally made the stereotypical Tumblr strawman for your book!: white, presumably cisgender, tall, skinny, blonde.
The Asian characters are treated like the two most basic Western entertainment tropes: weird, and sex object. Insulting. Just because you have a diverse cast doesn’t save you from being horribly offensive to the races being portrayed.
Music Ignorance: By this point in the review I’ve made it to page 238, and again, I had to stop. I wanted to wait to continue my review until I was finished with the book completely, but unfortunately I was getting physically ill and HAD to stop. For a book that’s meant to be showcasing musical artists and a world famous band, it’s clear that this author is very ignorant to both the music industry, and just music history and culture. Like quirkiness, I don’t mind if characters are ‘hipsters’ with music, but you have to make them actual hipsters. Make up bands that no one has heard of, or reference bands that are very indie and little known. But you cannot reference names such as Bowie, DAVID BOWIE, and have the pretentiousness to have your characters say ‘We were the only kids in our school that had even heard of David Bowie.’ That is a bold faced lie, you could jump into any high school or middle school right now and find tons of kids that know who this man is. Other bands that were mentioned as ‘only them knowing’ are names like Green Day...GREEN DAY STILL PERFORMS AND TEENS STILL KNOW WHO THEY ARE. Also, they were ‘the only kids in school to know all the words to Blink 182’s ‘All the Small Things’ ‘ WHAT. Are you kidding me right now? Arguably their most popular song that is STILL used for internet memes, and you expect me to believe that no teenagers know that song? You have to be high, or this has to be set in the year 2300.
Ok listen, if you want your characters to be ‘quirky and cool and hip and know so much classic rock -cough Green Day isn’t classic rock cough-’, then actually DO that. It’s truly amazing that an author would choose some of the most well known bands of all time and claim that kids today just ‘won’t know who they are’. Was this a way to make the reader feel like they were special? ‘Hey young reader, you like Green Day and David Bowie? That makes you special because no one else does! Even though literally EVERYONE else knows who they are!’ It’s a sad attempt and insults the intelligence of the reader. And on top of that, it insults the actual impact that the artists did leave in music history, especially the late David Bowie.
When it comes to the music itself, I’ll say it: the lyrics are terrible. Some people can write poetry, and some people can’t. These lyrics are the sappiest most ballad laden lyrics, and they aren’t good, but that’s not even the entire point. This band is said to be (again, told, not shown) punk rock, but they are shown to be (for once actually shown) pop, maybe alternative at the absolute most. These are not punk rock lyrics, here’s a sample:
I think you’re flirting with that grin
I think I’m flirting too
You won my heart
When you held my hand
When you call me around
I can’t get there fast enough
You wait for me at the door
Arms open when I show up
It’s all new, this feelin’ and me
Never felt this, about anyone
Yeah, can’t you just imagine Green Day, Rufio, Breathe Carolina, We Came as Romans or Paramore singing that? No? Me neither. And every damn song that we are shown is like that. Why did you make them ‘punk rock’ ? They aren’t, they aren’t even pop punk. Aesthetically I will say, they dress that way, but that’s style, not music. Music isn’t just about what you look like, it’s how you sound. Avril Lavigne is a good mainstream example of pop punk, this band doesn’t even come close to that. Where is the anger? Aggression? Rawness? Where? Just make them pop with punk clothing styles, geez.
As for the music industry itself, this book is not an accurate portrayal of how it actually works. And if you don’t want to do that, then don’t write a book showing what it’s like to be a ‘rock star’. Panic! At the Disco, the poster child for ‘overnight fame’ did not even get on World Tour status as fast as these children did. And no offense, but they were much better than The Brightsiders as far as lyrics are concerned (seriously the lyrics in this book make me gag and cringe and I feel embarrassed for the characters). No matter how much I’ve read, I cannot suspend my disbelief long enough to choke down that these kids are as good as I’m being told (not shown) they are, and that they rocketed so success this fast simply from winning Battle of the Bands (not kidding).
It’s portrayed as if their LGBT+ status is why they’re so popular. That is ALSO insulting, especially when actual GOOD LGBT+ artists such as Troye Sivan have been climbing and climbing to get where they are now, WHILE having a strong social media presence, and didn’t get as successful as these children. Let me let you in on a little secret, being LGBT+ doesn’t boost your music career, in ‘the biz’, it actually hurts you and you’re highly discriminated against by the people in charge. It’s a lot of work and stress, you have to put that work in, not just win Battle of the Bands. This is such an insult to actual LGBT+ artists that have had to claw their way to the top out of the discrimination pool.
And one of my least favorite Tumblr ‘and then they all clapped’ moments, was when they walk up to a band they opened for ‘back in the day’, and of course that band had turned into jerks. Why wouldn’t they be? Gosh it was such a ‘and then everybody clapped’ story. You know the ones, when someone says a story happened to them on Tumblr that you know didn’t happen and their story ends with, ‘and then they all clapped for me!’. Yeah, that’s this book in a nutshell.
Characters:
Em/Emmy - I want to like this character, I really do, but she is the definition of a Mary Sue. Anything she does aside from the drinking incident at the beginning, is completely swept under the rug. Nothing is ever her fault, it’s always because of someone else. When she should be feeling guilty about her stupid decisions, she’s instead hugged and snuggled and told that she’s right. I feel like I’m stuck inside Tumblr, like when a user with a million followers says something like ‘I’m sad today, I didn’t get my homework done in time T_T’ and then you see a billion notes that are like ‘it’s ok babeh! You’ll be fine, you’re beautiful! Homework is just part of the establishment!’ Ugh. This character has no growth. I guess you can say she handles her alcoholism, but it’s downplayed so much and does not show an accurate struggle of a recovering alcoholic. She doesn’t go to rehab, she’s just got ‘real good pals’. Please. If you want to tackle something like addiction, then don’t belittle the actual struggle that people go through. Again I’m reminded of dumb internet things like ‘you don’t need pills for depression, just go outside!’ Ugh. This character. I will say that she loves her fans and I do feel that. It’s probably the only human thing about her. She plays like a fanfiction character that can do no wrong and just-I can’t continue on with her, we have more characters to get to.
Alfie - I actually liked Alfie, I don’t like that the writer can only describe his face in two ways: suggestive, or smirk. Which is fair since all Em can do is ‘whine’ or ‘swoon’. Ugh. Anyways, back to Alfie. He’s actually done very well and I love that a gender fluid character is front and center for a book. He’s an awesome love interest, and I actually do buy that he and Em have a thing for each other. His stress/anxiety disorder was very well done and I liked that it brought light to something so many people struggle with in a way that was well presented, but not in your face obnoxious.
Ryan - He’s ‘the weird Asian gay friend’. Sadly that’s all I can say, he was very underdeveloped and fell into the same unfortunate tropes that most Asian characters are lumped with in Western entertainment. Ryan deserved more.
Chloe - In my opinion they’re a well done representation of a non binary person, so for that I’ll give praise. But everything else about this character is tired and cliche: tragic backstory that no one would ever actually believe, black no biracial no black no gosh darnit what’s more edgy right now what can i shoehorn in ok nevermind biracial, a ‘yes’ person, feels more like a prop than a human, unrealistic YouTube fame.
The Parents - The award to most unrealistic villain goes to these two suckers. I’m not saying that parents can’t be like this, I’m just saying that the kid would be way more screwed up. I guess you can use the argument that Em has an amazing support system, but...they can’t be that great if no one ever called Child Services on these assholes. Not even Em’s aunt who moved away because Em’s parents were such jerks. Really? No one thought to call child services when a kid’s life was THIS much in danger?
Jessie - Yep, this is what humans act like. She’s such a weak throwaway character that was literally just there for one stupid plot point that I won’t waste time on her other than: Hey hey, you you, I don’t like your girlfriend! No way no way, I think you need a new one! Hey hey, you you, I could be your girl/boyfriend! Ugh, I feel like I just punched poor Avril in the face for that. NOT THAT ANYONE KNOWS WHO SHE IS A DERP A DERP DERP.
I won’t bother with the rest of the characters because honestly, most of them (including some in the above list) are basically copies of each other. They’re all ‘so progressive and nice and sweet and supportive and hip and edgy’ that you can’t really distinguish one from the other.
The characters aren’t people, the racial diversity and LGBT+ aspect is borderline exploitive, and on top of it, on top of everything else, it’s not even a particularly good writing style.
I do not like this book, I would never recommend it, if you loved it then good for you but I did not. I have not given up on this author though, this is the first book I’ve read by them and I do want to give them another shot.