Toby Janicki has done his homework, and then decided summarily to toss it out for agenda, which is sad because there is plenty of good information here.
The Didache from a historical perspective is a fascinating document due in large part to it being lost for a century or so before being found in a Greek Orthodox Monastery. If you are reading this review you know, or shortly shall know, much more concerning that, therefore I will leave off the introduction.
My biggest recurring beef with the book is plainly bad translation. It is bad because Janicki, like the translators of the NLT Bible (New Living Translation), infuses personal agenda over and against good translation and exegesis. He does this in the name of “clarity” which is him being dishonest, whether with himself or with readers I cannot say. Anyone who can read and translate biblical Greek into modern English can quickly see where Janicki does this, heck even people with enough knowledge to look up certain terms can figure it out. One of the worst cases is translating the term ‘ekklesia’ as assembly, which is technically true, but considering the import of the word and the context of its time it is much better communicated as the church to get at the full meaning. Janicki is a fan of transliteration and literalisation from the Greek and from the Hebrew. I would not fault people for applying these while using things like the Blue Letter Bible; but people who take the time to learn and profess expertise I have no sympathy for, especially when similar agenda driven translation is done again and again.
His assumption that the Didache is Jewish in origin is not in dispute, and I don’t believe it ever has been except maybe by outliers. Nevertheless he argues as though the general origin is some hotbed of controversy. So that is another point against the book, creating a problem where there is not one.
There are good points to the book and some good insights that come through, because fortunately Janicki is only half incompetent (I do wish to think positively). He does well to point the actual links to Christian tradition from Judaism and then completely ignores half of Church history while excoriating anything remotely Roman Catholic and Protestant.
The Didache itself is an instruction booklet and it does have helpful instructions, but I would not recommend Janicki’s book as a commentary on it because it requires as much education as the author (if not more) to read well and wade through anachronistic arguments that try such things as claiming the pharisees were not the ones being called hypocrites by Christ.