What do you think?
Rate this book


329 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1908
that with the flying machine war alters in its character; it ceases to be an affair of 'fronts' and becomes an affair of 'areas'; neither side, victor or loser, remains immune from the gravest injuries, and while there is a vast increase in the destructiveness of war, there is also an increased indecisiveness. Consequently 'War in the Air' means social destruction instead of victory as the end of war. It not only alters the methods of war but the consequences of war.
"Bert, craning his neck through the cabin porthole, saw the whole of that incident, that first encounter of aeroplane and ironclad. He saw the queer German Drachenflieger, with their wide flat wings and square, box-shaped heads, their wheeled bodies, and their single-man riders soar down the air like a flight of birds... One to the right pitched down extravagantly, shot steeply up into the air, burst with a loud report, and flamed down into the sea; another plunged nose forward into the water and seemed to fly to pieces as it hit the waves."
"He saw little men on the deck of the Theodore Roosevelt below, men foreshortened in plan into mere heads and feet, running out preparing to shoot at the [other Drachenflieger]. Then the foremost flying machine was rushing between Bert and the American deck, and then bang! came the thunder of its bomb flung neatly at the forward barbette and a thin little crackling of rifle shots in reply. Whack whack whack, went the quick-firing guns of the American's battery and smash came the answering shell from the Fuerst Bismarck. Then a second and third flying-machine passed between Burt and the American ironclad, dropping bombs also, and a fourth, it's rider hit by a bullet, reeled down and dashed itself to pieces and exploded between the shot-torn funnels, blowing them apart. Bert had a momentary glimpse of a little black creature jumping from the crumpling frame of the flying machine, hitting the funnel, and falling limply, to be instantly caught and driven to nothingness by the blaze and rush of explosion."
"Smash! came a vast explosion in the forward part of the flagship, and a huge piece of metalwork seemed to lift out of her and dump itself into the sea, dropping men and leaving a gap into which a prompt Drachenflieger planted a flaring bomb. And then for an instant Bert perceived only too clearly in the growing, pitiless light a number of minute, convulsively active animalculae scorched and struggling in the Theodore Roosevelt's foaming wake. What were they? Not men - surely not men? Those drowning, mangled little creatures tore with their clutching fingers at Bert's soul."
"Bert stood on the gallery, curious to see the execution, but uncomfortable because that terrible blond Prince was within a dozen feet of him, glaring terribly, with his arms folded and his heels together in military fashion.
They hung the man from the Adler. They gave him sixty feet of rope, so that he should hang and dangle in the sight of all evil-doers who might be hiding matches or contemplating any kindred disobedience. Bart saw the man standing, a living, reluctant man, no doubt scared and rebellious enough in his heart, but outwardly erect and obedient, on the lower gallery of the Adler about a hundred yards away. Then they thrust him overboard...
Down he fell, hands and feet extended, until with a jerk he was at the end of the rope. Then he ought to have died and swung edifyingly, but instead a more terrible thing happened; his head came right off, and down the body went spinning into the sea, feeble, grotesque, fantastic, and with the head racing it in its fall."
"...The [missing] bird-faced officer was already rubbing shoulders with certain inert matter that had once been Lieutenant Kurt and the Chinese aeronaut and a dead cow, and much other uncongenial company, in the huge circle of the Whirlpool two and a quarter miles away. Never had that great gathering place, that incessant, aimless, unprogressive hurry of waste and battered things been so crowded with strange and melancholy derelicts. Round they went and round, and every day brought it's new contributions, luckless brutes, shattered fragments of boat and flying-machine, endless citizens from the cities upon the shores of the great lakes above. Much came from Cleveland. It all gathered here, and whirled about indefinitely, and over it all gathered daily a greater abundance of birds."
"[Tom] sucked his old gums thoughtfully, and his gaze strayed away across the valley to where the shattered glass of the Crystal Palace glittered in the sun. A dim, large sense of waste and irrevocably lost opportunities pervaded his mind. He repeated his ultimate judgment upon all these things, obstinately, slowly, and conclusively, his final saying on the matter.
'You can say whay you like,' he said. 'It didn't ought ever to 'ave begin.'
He said it simply - somebody somewhere ought to have stopped something, but who or how or why were beyond all his ken."
Like all prophecies, real events in the twentieth century followed elements of The War in the Air, but in twisted sorts of ways. The book is usually linked to the first world war, but in my view it more closely predicts World War II, with its extensive bombing campaigns and the way war twisted and changed as a result. Wells predicts the way fleets of bombers will make countries once guarded by oceans vulnerable to surprise attacks; the way bombing in the time before precision munitions, and given the increased salience of industry to warfare, would lead to the destruction of urban centers and the increased vulnerability of civilian populations to collateral damage and terror-bombing campaigns; the role of fighters to protect slower and more vulnerable bombers; even the strategic weakness of air forces – that is, their inability to hold territory. These broad predictions are more relevant than the details which Wells tends to get distractingly wrong, like the dominance of airships instead of heavier-than-air craft, or the development of flapping-wing type flyers. However, like much of Wells’ science fiction, the story is less about what was at the time a science fiction rendering of aerial warfare and more about a social commentary and critique on his contemporary civilization.
This commentary is conveyed, sometimes explicitly, by the book’s third person omniscient narrator, who takes a rather dim view of the protagonist, Bert. Even Bert’s last name, Smallways, seems deliberately chosen to diminish him. He’s depicted as something of a bumbling conman, unthinking and uncaring about the state of nations, the world, his place in it, or anything else with which the narrator believes he ought to concern himself. What can be read as his innocence in the book’s early chapters is conveyed more like ignorance, even idiocy, and his ineptitude is what leads him into a position from which the reader can appreciate the advent of aerial warfare and the attendant destructive spiral, which we will address in somewhat more detail in a forthcoming post, which will definitely contain spoilers. In the narrator’s view, Bert is both a victim of the broken and immoral systems in which he lives, and contemptible for his complacency within it. Perhaps this implicit belief in the brokenness and unredeemability of both the systems and the individuals helps grant the author and reader permission for the destruction which is forthcoming.
For, though the narrator makes some gestures to the human toll and tragedy attendant to the war in the air, the downward spiral precipitated by the first battles is holistically depicted with a kind of solemn glee, as of someone who wouldn’t do it himself, and deplores the costs, but who thinks it perhaps for the best that everything burn down. The story’s conclusion endorses this interpretation, for while the narrator never really comes to approve of Bert or his type of person, they and their existences are depicted far more favorably after the novel’s main action concludes. It’s less that the narrator endorses the state of affairs which arises as a consequence of the war in the air, and more that he finds it less abhorrent, more natural, and more fulfilling than the status quo antebellum.
Apparently, Wells is often accused of racism in The War in the Air, which I think is a misreading. Some of the characters certainly are, but to take the ostensibly racist statements made by the narrator at face value is to miss the narrator’s fundamental cynicism. Rather than mindlessly echoing such sentiments, it seems the narrator repeats them in order to highlight how preposterous they are. Nor is the division of the world into the East and West for the core of the conflict either a racist reflection or an unreasonable extrapolation for the time. The terminology certainly reads as antiquated, but a modern reader familiar with the Chinese-Japanese conflict in the second world war misses how that animosity evolved over the decades intervening between this novel’s publication and the onset of that later war. Besides, the book’s critique is primarily focused on nationalism, and touches upon racism only insofar as it is related to nationalism or statism (and remember, the United States and a few other countries are quite anomalous in that there is a minimal ethnic component to their national identities; nation-states traditional build their identities around a certain degree of shared ethnicity). I’m not suggesting there is no hint of racism in the book, but I do not believe it is as egregious, nor the narrator as approving or ignorant of its harms, as critics decry.
Despite Wells’ pessimism, humanity survived its first great “war in the air,” and it survived the Cold War with its threats of global nuclear conflict which followed. With hindsight and given how far technology and culture have moved beyond what is depicted in this novel, it can be tempting to put The War in the Air aside as simply a product of its time, a curiosity with little relevance today. Unlike The Island of Doctor Moreau or some of Wells’ other science fiction novels, there is not an implicit or explicit message warning about the general dangers of science misapplied or of scientific progress run rampant without heed to morality or consequence. It reads more specifically than that, and its social critiques can also be dismissed as specific to early twentieth century Europe (and particularly Britain). However, to do so misses an opportunity, not just to read a rather fascinating and well-composed novel of classic science fiction, but to witness a vision of what might have been, and to reflect upon the critiques Wells offers and how they might apply or not apply today. In fact, it may be more useful now, with a bit of distance, than it was in its own day, for science fiction is often at its best when the distance it gives allows us to consider difficult questions which we might otherwise be inclined to dismiss.
HERE in 1941 The War in the Air is being reprinted once again.
It was written in 1907 and first published in 1908.
It was reprinted in 1921, and then I wrote a preface which also I am reprinting.
Again I ask the reader to note the warnings I gave in that year, twenty years ago.
Is there anything to add to that preface now? Nothing except my epitaph.
That, when the time comes, will manifestly have to be: "I told you so. You _damned_ fools."