Star Rating: 5 stars
Note: This is the 10th book in the Jack Howard series so this will not be an in-depth review.
When I was younger, I really wanted to be an archaeologist and actually considered going to college for it, but then I realized with my severe anxiety, I wouldn’t be able to do that so as with most things, I decided to live out my dreams through books. (Since I can’t leave my home most days, I use my books and dramas as a way to escape when I can’t physically.) With that being said, I was able to pick up book 10 of the Jack Howard series, Inquisition, in June. This book tells of the adventures of Jack Howard, a famous fictional underwater archaeologist, as he travels the world finding priceless artifacts, in this volume in particular, it’s the Holy Grail.
One of the things I like most about this book was Gibbins’s ability to interweave multiple different historical storylines into a coherent plot. For instance, in this book, he interweaves storylines from 258 A.D., 1684, present day, and well as Jack Howard’s fictional family history into a seamless plot that makes total sense and is beautifully rendered. He also manages to do this without losing any of his threads which I personally would not be able to do. The reason why I think this affected me in the way that it did is the fact that these interwoven storylines allowed him to discuss a theme that I hold very close to my heart and that is the interconnectedness of history. We learn in school that history is like a line with evenly spaced steps but that is actually not the case, instead it is a tightly woven web where you pull one string only to get to unearth the tangle. I have never read an author that was able to showcase and discuss this theme with such clarity, but this may because he understands the concept/theme better than most people because he actually is a practicing underwater archaeologist. Practice what you preach, you know?
When we are on the subject of themes, another one that he addresses is the idea that censorship, particularly when it comes to history, should not exist. In history class, we tend to get a viewpoint of history that is kind of like looking through rose-colored glasses, which means we tend to only get the highlights. While this is good for basic history classes, some of them also tend to gloss over the bad parts, particularly in classes with younger children, due to the fact that some periods can be traumatic. As I mentioned, I think getting the highlights can be great for basic classes, however, I don’t feel that things should be glossed over as the whole point of history is to learn from the mistakes of the past to prevent them for happening in the present. If you don’t discuss the bad parts, then why are learning history as you have mitigated the whole reason to learn it. In my opinion, give them the full picture and if it makes them uncomfortable, then you have achieved your goal because if they are offended/uncomfortable, then they probably won’t make the same mistake and will therefore, make the future better.
All in all, this was a great addition to the series, and I greatly enjoyed it. If Gibbins chooses to write more books in this series, then I will definitely read them. 5 stars!!!!!