I would recommend this biography of Anne Boleyn to anyone who doesn't know much about the ill-fated queen and who wishes for a sympathetic treatment of her life. As in her previous books, Amy Licence doesn't adopt a partisan stance as some other popular historians do; she is fair to all of the central players in Anne's story and is sympathetic to Anne without portraying her as a saint or helpless victim. Licence attempts to place Anne in her sixteenth-century context as an aristocratic woman, with the duties and choices that entailed, and presents Anne's ambition and desire for success within that framework.
For those who have read a number of academic and scholarly studies of Anne, this biography doesn't offer much in the way of anything new and it doesn't change our perceptions of Anne's eventful life or her tragic downfall. Another reviewer suggested that this book's interpretation is somewhat cool, and I can agree in the sense that it doesn't provide any real sense of who Anne was or the nature of her personality. The discussion of her downfall is rather abrupt and doesn't analyse the reasons for her rapid disgrace. Other historians - such as Ives, Warnicke and Bernard - have engaged in a great detail of debate about Anne's downfall, and this biography doesn't add anything new to what those authors suggested lay behind Anne's execution. However, Licence is to be commended for considering a range of possibilities with regards to Henry and Anne's courtship, offering a multifaceted account of their relationship rather than assuming that Anne manipulated a weak king or, alternatively, that Anne was unwillingly pushed into marriage by an obsessed monarch. She offers a range of suggestions, as she does in previous books with regards to other issues, and thus leaves it up to the reader to decide what they think the likeliest option might have been.
Finally: the referencing in the book is terrible. There's no other way to say it. Page numbers are not provided, merely the author's name. This is a major problem when three books by that author are included in the bibliography, so merely writing 'Weir' or 'Norton' as a reference is unhelpful. I also found it puzzling why so many works were included in the footnotes that were not referenced in the bibliography. Whether the publishers didn't proofread this book sufficiently, I don't know. But there are hundreds of spelling mistakes and basic errors. For example: Henry's marriage to Anne was annulled on 17 May 1536, not 14 May. Anne wore an English gable hood on the scaffold, not a French hood. Licence mentions both that Anne may have been sexually corrupted in France, leading to Henry's disillusionment with her, and that Mary Boleyn also resided in France, but both of these theories have been convincingly questioned by other historians. Likewise Licence suggests that Jane Boleyn testified against her husband in 1536, providing evidence for incest - it's very much uncertain that she did; moreover, yellow was not the national colour of mourning in Spain as the author claims in regards to Katherine of Aragon's death and the resulting celebrations at court.
It was Anne's father, not her mother, who was related to the Irish Butlers. Anne's mother's name was Elizabeth, not Margaret. Thomas Boleyn's father-in-law was Thomas Howard, duke of Norfolk, not Thomas Butler. Thomas Wyatt was 23, not 25, in 1526. Henry VIII was 36, not 38, in 1527. Louis XII was married to the duchess Joan, not Anne. Katherine Carey was 4, not 14, in 1528. Margaret Pole, countess of Salisbury, was the second cousin of Henry VIII, not his aunt. It was the unknown Spanish chronicler, not Nicholas Sander, who accused Anne of having sexual relations with Thomas Wyatt in her bedchamber.
It was not the dowager countess of Oxford and the duchess of Somerset who sat at Anne's feet during her coronation banquet, it was two unnamed gentlewomen. The dowager countess of Oxford and the countess of Worcester stood before her holding a cloth for her to spit in.
The future Elizabeth I was born on a Sunday not Thursday.
So, a fair effort and a sympathetic account of Anne Boleyn with a beautiful cover design, but readers would appreciate better referencing in future books. The publishers should also be sorting out, prior to publication, the numerous spelling mistakes and basic historical errors that unfortunately cropped up too much in this otherwise detailed biography.